| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Algers, Anne, 1961, et al.
(author)
-
A New Format for Learning about Farm Animal Welfare
- 2011
-
In: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1187-7863 .- 1573-322X. ; 24:4, s. 367-379
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Farm animal welfare is a knowledge domain that can be regarded as a model for new ways of organizing learning and making higher education more responsive to the needs of society. Global concern for animal welfare has resulted in a great demand for knowledge. As a complement to traditional education in farm animal welfare, higher education can be more demand driven and look at a broad range of methods to make knowledge available. The result of an inventory on “farm animal welfare,” “e-learning,” “learning resources,” and “open educational resources” in three different search engines is presented. A huge amount of information on animal welfare is available on the Internet but many of the providers lock in the knowledge in a traditional course context. Only a few universities develop and disseminate open learning resources within the subject. Higher education institutions are encouraged to develop open educational resources in animal welfare for the benefit of teachers, students, society, and, indirectly, animal welfare.
|
|
| 3. |
- Algers, Anne, 1961, et al.
(author)
-
Open Educational Resources in Animal Ethics and Food Ethics.
- 2011
-
In: Proceedings of the EADTU Annual Conference: Universities and regional development in an open knowledge society; sharing innovation and knowledge in European universities, Eskisehir, Turkey, 3-4 November, 2011.. - Eskisehir, Turkey, 3-4 November, 2011 : EADTU, Heerlen. - 9789079730094 ; , s. 9-19
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 4. |
- Algers, Anne, 1961, et al.
(author)
-
Open educational resources in animal welfare
- 2010
-
In: Paper presented at the International conference on animal welfare education: Everyone is responsible., Brussels,1-2 October 2010.. ; , s. 46-53
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Changes in law (1) and pronounced demands of knowledge on Animal Welfare (2) require a change of paradigm in Animal Welfare Education. A new strategy is recommended, based on network learning involving higher education institutions and other organisations in the production and distribution of learning resources that can be shared openly and free of charge on the internet. Although the trend of Open Educational Resources (OER) is very recent, the development of resources is rapid and vibrant (3). The incentives for engaging in the OER trend at the governmental, institutional, and individual level are presented here and quality control and sustainability are discussed. It should be considered that the EU commission takes the lead and allocates resources for the development of a central repository with OER, as well as a quality assurance strategy.
|
|
| 5. |
- Algers, Anne, 1961, et al.
(author)
-
Open educational resources in animal welfare.
- 2010
-
In: Proceedings of the international conference on animal welfare education: Everyone is responsible. Brussels, 1-2 October 2010. ISBN: 987-92-79-16225-1.European Union, Brussels. - 9789279162251 ; , s. 46-53
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 6. |
- Algers, Anne, et al.
(author)
-
Work-based learning through negotiated projects : Exploring learning at the boundary
- 2016
-
In: Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning. - 2042-3896 .- 2042-390X. ; 6:1, s. 2-19
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PurposeMore collaborative and open learning models are suggested as part of the paradigm shift in the way knowledge is produced, distributed and used. This paper aims to explore a work-based learning model, based on systemic negotiations between actors from the three parties: The academy, the industry and the students. The purpose is to investigate how teachers, supervisors and students value negotiated work-based learning as a boundary activity and to enhance the understanding of the learning potential at the boundary.Design/methodology/approachActivity theory is used as a lens to analyse the results from a survey to the three stakeholder groups and interviews of students. The four learning mechanisms are used to explore learning at the boundary between the two activity systems.FindingsDiversity and mobility in education and work addressed by the notion of boundary crossing are associated with both challenges and a learning potential. There is a constant dynamic between structure and agency, where structure, the negotiated model, influence the individual agency. When gradually removing scaffolding students can as boundary crossers engage behaviourally, emotionally, and cognitively and have agency to handle contradictions at a local level. However, they did not seem to prioritize both systems equally but instead they were gradually socialised into the activity system of the industry.Originality/valueWhen work-based learning is framed by a negotiated partnership it can manage and customize inherent conflicts of interest and enhance individual learning opportunities at the boundary and can be conceptualized as an open learning practice.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Andersson, Annika, 1981-
(author)
-
In case of emergency : Collaboration exercises at the boundaries between emergency service organizations
- 2016
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Due to the emergent and dynamic nature of incidents, the complexity of emergency work is often referred to as a challenge for learning. Another recurrent challenge in emergency work is that of collaboration at and across established organizational boundaries involving actors with specific types of expertise who are operating under different regulations and responsibilities. In addition, training emergency service organizations in collaboration remains a challenge. In light of the difficulties and shortcomings that have been identified in major incident responses, the need for exercises for developing and maintaining collaborative response effectiveness prior to the next incident is often highlighted. The overall aim of this thesis is to understand how full-scale exercises can provide conditions for developing inter-organizational collaboration between the police, ambulance and rescue services at the incident site. Learning activities that carry the potential to support and develop collaborative capacity, and how the alignment of distributed expertise can be trained for, were of particular interest. Interviews with participants in eight full-scale exercises with professionals and interviews and observations of one exercise with senior-level students in Sweden served as the empirical base.Central concepts from Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) provided theoretical tools to explore the exercises and understand boundaries between organizations with a wider, systemic approach. The empirical studies show that the participants understood full-scale exercises to be valuable opportunities for becoming involved in response work, making decisions, and acting and interacting in uncertain situations and realistic environments. As in real-life responses, exercises are characterized by the stabilization and confirmation of everyday routines on the one hand, and by improvisation and change on the other hand. The studies also show that exercises tend to focus on specific scenarios,intra-organizational routines, and leadership positions. Infrequent exercises inwhich the participants were only trained in a limited role were perceived to be in adequate for developing preparedness and collaboration. However, the analysis suggested that the way in which exercises were organized and performed had implications for how participants were trained in collaboration.Realizing the potential of boundaries as resources for learning in exercises depends on how boundaries are explicated and approached. Thus, rather than striving to ignore or eliminate boundaries in exercises, the studies illustrated the learning value of explicitly reflecting on the multiple understandings around boundaries. The studies demonstrated that much of the work at an incident site takes place around negotiations. Collaboration at the incident site was not only aquestion about boundary crossing; operational tasks may not always be aligned and have to be prioritized and sequenced. The exercises comprised work situations in which no single motive could explain or determine the collaboration,due to different types of expertise, primary responsibilities and needs forinformation. These factors were understood in terms of the concepts of boundarywork and boundary awareness. These concepts point at a more divergent understanding of collaboration that reaches beyond striving to create mutual understanding between organizations in learning activities. Differences between organizations, such as in terminology, time horizons, priorities, leadership structures, understandings of safety and how intra-organizational decisions and actions could impact the collaborating organizations' work, were central triggers for discussion and negotiation. These differences required explanations in order to make the actions and decisions of one organization understandable and justifiable to another, based on organizational mandates and types of expertise.Giving emergency services the opportunity to work together, to develop an awareness of their expectations of each other in various situations, to use and interpret their own and others' terminologies, and to identify internal hierarchies and motives for prioritizations was essential dimensions of exercises
|
|
| 9. |
- Andersson, Annika, 1981-, et al.
(author)
-
Making collaboration work : Developing boundary work and boundary awareness in emergency exercises
- 2017
-
In: Journal of Workplace Learning. - 1366-5626 .- 1758-7859. ; 29:4, s. 286-303
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Collaboration in emergency work is challenging on many levels. The unforeseen and temporary nature of incidents presents basic challenges. Another important challenge is boundaries between specialized and autonomous emergency service organizations. We need to know more about how exercises are performed to increase the individuals and organizations preparedness for future joint response work. The aim of this study was to explore how boundary work is carried out at the incident site during exercises, and how boundary awareness is developed based on this boundary work. The analytic focus was on how boundaries were identified, negotiated and managed in the participants work. Empirically, full-scale exercises involving police, ambulance and rescue services and with repetition of practical scenarios and joint-reflection seminars are studied. Much of the work in the exercises was performed within distinct areas of expertise, in accordance with concrete routines, skills and responsibilities. Boundary work was often organized in the form of distribution of labour or creating chains of actions. The exercises shed light on challenges related to other aspects of emergency response,such as a lack of resources, diverging primary responsibilities, time-criticality and hazardous environments. The design allowed participants to explicate boundaries, test and discuss alternative solutions, and to visualize the effects of different solutions as the scenarios were repeated. The boundaries that were identified were often of institutional character, and were also related to the specific scenarios and to the actions taken in the activities. By integrating real-life experiences of collaborative work in the exercise, the exercise gained a certain meaning that was essential for the participants to develop boundary awareness.
|
|
| 10. |
- Andersson, A., et al.
(author)
-
Making collaboration work - developing boundary work and boundary awareness in emergency exercises
- 2017
-
In: Journal of Workplace Learning. - : Emerald. - 1366-5626. ; 29:4, s. 286-303
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose - This study aims to investigate how boundary work is carried out at the incident site during exercises with police, ambulance and rescue services, and how boundary awareness is developed based on this boundary work. Collaboration in emergency work is challenging on many levels. The unforeseen and temporary nature of incidents presents basic challenges. Another important challenge is boundaries between specialised and autonomous emergency service organisations. Knowledge on how exercises are performed to increase the individuals' and organisations' preparedness for future joint-response work is relatively limited. Design/methodology/approach - Empirically, full-scale exercises involving police, ambulance and rescue services and with repetition of practical scenarios and joint-reflection seminars are studied. Interview data with 26 exercise participants were analysed using thematic analysis. The analytic focus is on how boundaries are identified, negotiated and managed in the participants' work. Findings - Much of the work in the exercises was performed within distinct areas of expertise, in accordance with concrete routines, skills and responsibilities. Boundary work was often organised in the form of distribution of labour or creating chains of actions. The exercises shed light on challenges related to other aspects of emergency response, such as a lack of resources, diverging primary responsibilities, time-criticality and hazardous environments. The design allowed participants to explicate boundaries, to test and discuss alternative solutions and to visualise the effects of different solutions, as the scenarios were repeated. Originality/value - The study found that the boundaries that were identified were often of institutional character, and were also related to the specific scenarios and to the actions taken in the activities. By integrating real-life experiences of collaborative work in the exercise, the exercise gained a certain meaning that was essential for the participants to develop boundary awareness.
|
|
