SwePub - search: WFRF:(Møllebæk Mathias)

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia, et al. (author) Methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity in qualitative research 2022 In: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. - 1551-7411 .- 1934-8150. ; 18:1, s. 567-573 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract A methodological debate within social pharmacy is ongoing regarding how to apply a qualitative approach. This paper emanates from a workshop at the Nordic Social Pharmacy Conference in 2019, named 'How do we know it's good? A workshop on quality criteria in qualitative social and clinical pharmacy research', that addressed this debate. The aim of this paper is twofold (1) to present the main key points raised during the workshop and (2) based on these inputs to contribute to the ongoing discussion on qualitative methodology within social pharmacy research. This paper starts with what was discussed at the workshop and further elaborated are some of the challenges with conducting qualitative research within social pharmacy. These include methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity, reflections on the consequences of that many social pharmacy researchers come from a natural science background and how this (possibly) shapes the practice of qualitative research within the field. For example, how concepts like transparency and saturation, together with checklists and quality criteria are understood and used. Finally, we make suggestions for the next step for qualitative research in social pharmacy.

Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia, et al. (author)
Methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity in qualitative research
2022
In: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. - 1551-7411 .- 1934-8150. ; 18:1, s. 567-573
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- A methodological debate within social pharmacy is ongoing regarding how to apply a qualitative approach. This paper emanates from a workshop at the Nordic Social Pharmacy Conference in 2019, named 'How do we know it's good? A workshop on quality criteria in qualitative social and clinical pharmacy research', that addressed this debate. The aim of this paper is twofold (1) to present the main key points raised during the workshop and (2) based on these inputs to contribute to the ongoing discussion on qualitative methodology within social pharmacy research. This paper starts with what was discussed at the workshop and further elaborated are some of the challenges with conducting qualitative research within social pharmacy. These include methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity, reflections on the consequences of that many social pharmacy researchers come from a natural science background and how this (possibly) shapes the practice of qualitative research within the field. For example, how concepts like transparency and saturation, together with checklists and quality criteria are understood and used. Finally, we make suggestions for the next step for qualitative research in social pharmacy.

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Møllebæk Mathias) "

Refine your search