SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Max Anna 1983) "

Search: WFRF:(Max Anna 1983)

  • Result 1-4 of 4
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Breznau, Nate, et al. (author)
  • Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty
  • 2022
  • In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. - : National Academy of Sciences. - 0027-8424 .- 1091-6490. ; 119:44
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • This study explores how researchers analytical choices affect the reliability of scientific findings. Most discussions of reliability problems in science focus on systematic biases. We broaden the lens to emphasize the idiosyncrasy of conscious and unconscious decisions that researchers make during data analysis. We coordinated 161 researchers in 73 research teams and observed their research decisions as they used the same data to independently test the same prominent social science hypothesis: that greater immigration reduces support for social policies among the public. In this typical case of social science research, research teams reported both widely diverging numerical findings and substantive conclusions despite identical start conditions. Researchers expertise, prior beliefs, and expectations barely predict the wide variation in research outcomes. More than 95% of the total variance in numerical results remains unexplained even after qualitative coding of all identifiable decisions in each teams workflow. This reveals a universe of uncertainty that remains hidden when considering a single study in isolation. The idiosyncratic nature of how researchers results and conclusions varied is a previously underappreciated explanation for why many scientific hypotheses remain contested. These results call for greater epistemic humility and clarity in reporting scientific findings.
  •  
2.
  • Sangchooli, Arshiya, et al. (author)
  • Parameter Space and Potential for Biomarker Development in 25 Years of fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity
  • 2024
  • In: JAMA psychiatry. - : AMER MEDICAL ASSOC. - 2168-6238 .- 2168-622X.
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Importance In the last 25 years, functional magnetic resonance imaging drug cue reactivity (FDCR) studies have characterized some core aspects in the neurobiology of drug addiction. However, no FDCR-derived biomarkers have been approved for treatment development or clinical adoption. Traversing this translational gap requires a systematic assessment of the FDCR literature evidence, its heterogeneity, and an evaluation of possible clinical uses of FDCR-derived biomarkers. Objective To summarize the state of the field of FDCR, assess their potential for biomarker development, and outline a clear process for biomarker qualification to guide future research and validation efforts. Evidence Review The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for every original FDCR investigation published from database inception until December 2022. Collected data covered study design, participant characteristics, FDCR task design, and whether each study provided evidence that might potentially help develop susceptibility, diagnostic, response, prognostic, predictive, or severity biomarkers for 1 or more addictive disorders. Findings There were 415 FDCR studies published between 1998 and 2022. Most focused on nicotine (122 [29.6%]), alcohol (120 [29.2%]), or cocaine (46 [11.1%]), and most used visual cues (354 [85.3%]). Together, these studies recruited 19 311 participants, including 13 812 individuals with past or current substance use disorders. Most studies could potentially support biomarker development, including diagnostic (143 [32.7%]), treatment response (141 [32.3%]), severity (84 [19.2%]), prognostic (30 [6.9%]), predictive (25 [5.7%]), monitoring (12 [2.7%]), and susceptibility (2 [0.5%]) biomarkers. A total of 155 interventional studies used FDCR, mostly to investigate pharmacological (67 [43.2%]) or cognitive/behavioral (51 [32.9%]) interventions; 141 studies used FDCR as a response measure, of which 125 (88.7%) reported significant interventional FDCR alterations; and 25 studies used FDCR as an intervention outcome predictor, with 24 (96%) finding significant associations between FDCR markers and treatment outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Based on this systematic review and the proposed biomarker development framework, there is a pathway for the development and regulatory qualification of FDCR-based biomarkers of addiction and recovery. Further validation could support the use of FDCR-derived measures, potentially accelerating treatment development and improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive clinical judgments.
  •  
3.
  • Hafström, L., et al. (author)
  • An exploration of Swedish companies' offshoring of R&D activities to China
  • 2010
  • In: 5th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT2010, Singapore; 2 June 2010 through 5 June 2010. - 9781424465675 ; , s. 306-311
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • A trend among manufacturing companies is offshoring of R & D. The aim of this study is to investigate Swedish companies' offshoring of R & D activities to China, utilizing both a survey and explorative case studies. The survey results show that 9% of the companies have offshored R & D to China, that performance in China is satisfactory, primarily in terms of costs, and that there is a need for strong integration mechanisms to handle coordination and information sharing. Based on the case studies, a categorization of firms offshoring R & D into Market- & Talent-driven firms and Low-cost & Supplydriven firms is proposed, as these have different challenges and require different managerial solutions. Finally, a dilemma concerning information sharing and innovation is identified and discussed. © 2010 IEEE.
  •  
4.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-4 of 4
Type of publication
research review (2)
conference paper (1)
journal article (1)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (4)
Author/Editor
Afshin, Ashkan (1)
Fanzo, Jessica (1)
Rivera, Juan A. (1)
Springmann, Marco (1)
Murray, Christopher ... (1)
Branca, Francesco (1)
show more...
Cornell, Sarah E. (1)
Troell, Max (1)
Potenza, Marc N. (1)
Hafström, I (1)
Heilig, Markus, 1959 ... (1)
Magnusson, Mats (1)
Rockström, Johan (1)
Lindahl, Therese (1)
Zhang, Nan (1)
Heinz, Andreas (1)
Azevedo, Flavio (1)
Yamada, Yuki (1)
Clark, Michael (1)
DeClerck, Fabrice (1)
Garavan, Hugh (1)
Willett, Walter (1)
Herrero, Mario (1)
Wood, Amanda (1)
Baumann, Markus (1)
Spanagel, Rainer (1)
Crona, Beatrice (1)
Nygård, Olav (1)
Gordon, Line J. (1)
Nishtar, Sania (1)
Hjerm, Mikael, 1969- (1)
Witkiewitz, Katie (1)
Ecker, Alejandro (1)
Hafström, L. (1)
Jonell, Malin, 1983- (1)
Bohman, Andrea, 1983 ... (1)
Eger, Maureen A., Dr ... (1)
Juliano, Anthony C. (1)
Hanlon, Colleen A. (1)
Breznau, Nate (1)
Rinke, Eike Mark (1)
Wuttke, Alexander (1)
Nguyen, Hung H. V. (1)
Adem, Muna (1)
Adriaans, Jule (1)
Alvarez-Benjumea, Am ... (1)
Andersen, Henrik K. (1)
Auer, Daniel (1)
Bahnsen, Oke (1)
Balzer, Dave (1)
show less...
University
Linköping University (2)
Umeå University (1)
Royal Institute of Technology (1)
Stockholm University (1)
Chalmers University of Technology (1)
Language
English (4)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Medical and Health Sciences (2)
Natural sciences (1)
Engineering and Technology (1)
Social Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view