| 2. |
- Wills, A. C., et al.
(author)
-
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, BMI, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Disease in Adults with Overweight/Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
- 2022
-
In: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0195-9131 .- 1530-0315. ; 54:6, s. 994-1001
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction We estimated the effects of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body mass index (BMI) at baseline on mortality and cardiovascular disease events in people with type 2 diabetes who participated in the Look AHEAD randomized clinical trial. Methods Look AHEAD compared effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention with diabetes support and education on cardiovascular disease events in 5145 adults age 45-76 yr with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. In 4773 participants, we performed a secondary analysis of the association of baseline CRF during maximal treadmill test (expressed as metabolic equivalents (METs)) on mortality and cardiovascular disease events during a mean follow-up of 9.2 yr. Results The mean (SD) CRF was 7.2 (2.0) METs. Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, intervention group, and beta-blocker use, all-cause mortality rate was 30% lower per SD greater METs (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.81); rate difference (RD), -2.71 deaths/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval, -3.79 to -1.63)). Similarly, an SD greater METs predicted lower cardiovascular disease mortality (HR, 0.45; RD, -1.65 cases/1000 person-years) and a composite cardiovascular outcome (HR, 0.72; RD, -6.38). Effects of METs were homogeneous on the HR scale for most baseline variables and outcomes but heterogeneous for many on the RD scale, with greater RD in subgroups at greater risk of the outcomes. For example, all-cause mortality was lower by 7.6 deaths/1000 person-years per SD greater METs in those with a history of cardiovascular disease at baseline but lower by only 1.6 in those without such history. BMI adjusted for CRF had little or no effect on these outcomes. Conclusions Greater CRF is associated with reduced risks of mortality and cardiovascular disease events.
|
|
| 3. |
- Thayabaranathan, Tharshanah, et al.
(author)
-
Global stroke statistics 2022
- 2022
-
In: International Journal of Stroke. - : SAGE Publications. - 1747-4930 .- 1747-4949. ; 17:9, s. 946-956
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Contemporary data on stroke epidemiology and the availability of national stroke clinical registries are important for providing evidence to improve practice and support policy decisions. Aims: To update the most current incidence, case-fatality, and mortality rates on stroke and identify national stroke clinical registries worldwide. Methods: We searched multiple databases (based on our existing search strategy) to identify new original papers, published between 1 November 2018 and 15 December 2021, that met ideal criteria for data on stroke incidence and case-fatality, and added these to the studies reported in our last review. To identify national stroke clinical registries, we updated our last search, using PubMed, from 6 February 2015 until 6 January 2022. We also screened reference lists of review papers, citation history of papers, and the gray literature. Mortality codes for International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 were extracted from the World Health Organization (WHO) for each country providing these data. Population denominators were obtained from the United Nations (UN) or WHO (when data were unavailable in the UN database). Crude and adjusted stroke mortality rates were calculated using country-specific population denominators, and the most recent years of mortality data available for each country. Results: Since our last report in 2020, there were two countries (Chile and France) with new incidence studies meeting criteria for ideal population-based studies. New data on case-fatality were found for Chile and Kenya. The most current mortality data were available for the year 2014 (1 country), 2015 (2 countries), 2016 (11 countries), 2017 (10 countries), 2018 (19 countries), 2019 (36 countries), and 2020 (29 countries). Four countries (Libya, Solomon Islands, United Arab Emirates, and Lebanon) reported mortality data for the first time. Since our last report on registries in 2017, we identified seven more national stroke clinical registries, predominantly in high-income countries. These newly identified registries yielded limited information. Conclusions: Up-to-date data on stroke incidence, case-fatality, and mortality continue to provide evidence of disparities and the scale of burden in low- and middle-income countries. Although more national stroke clinical registries were identified, information from these newly identified registries was limited. Highlighting data scarcity or even where a country is ranked might help facilitate more research or greater policy attention in this field.
|
|
