1. |
- Björkman, Anders, et al.
(author)
-
Phantom digit somatotopy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in forearm amputees.
- 2012
-
In: European Journal of Neuroscience. - : Wiley. - 1460-9568 .- 0953-816X. ; 36:1, s. 2098-2106
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Forearm amputees often experience non-painful sensations in their phantom when the amputation stump is touched. Cutaneous stimulation of specific stump areas may be perceived as stimulation of specific phantom fingers (stump hand map). The neuronal basis of referred phantom limb sensations is unknown. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate a somatotopic map of the phantom fingers in the hand region of the primary somatosensory cortex after tactile stump stimulation. The location and extent of phantom finger activation in the primary somatosensory cortex corresponded well to the location of normal fingers in a reference population. Stimulation of the stump hand map resulted in an increased bilateral activation of the primary somatosensory cortex compared with stimulation of forearm regions outside the stump hand map. Increased activation was also seen in contralateral posterior parietal cortex and premotor cortex. Ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex activation might represent a compensatory mechanism and activation of the non-primary fronto-parietal areas might correspond to awareness of the phantom limb, which is enhanced when experiencing the referred sensations. It is concluded that phantom sensation elicited by stimulation of stump hand map areas is associated with activation of finger-specific somatotopical representations in the primary somatosensory cortex. This suggests that the primary somatosensory cortex could be a neural substrate of non-painful phantom sensations. The stump hand map phenomenon might be useful in the development of prosthetic hand devices.
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Engellau, Lena, et al.
(author)
-
MR evaluation ex vivo and in vivo of a covered stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysms: ferromagnetism, heating, artifacts, and velocity mapping
- 2000
-
In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. - 1522-2586. ; 12:1, s. 112-121
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety was evaluated at 1.5 T in a covered nickel titanium stent-graft (Vanguard) used for endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Imaging artifacts were assessed on MRI with contrast-enhanced (CE) three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography (MRA) and spiral computed tomography (CT) in 10 patients as well as ex vivo. Velocity mapping was performed in the suprarenal aorta and femoral arteries in 14 patients before and after stent-graft placement. For comparison it was also performed in six healthy volunteers. No ferromagnetism or heating was detected. Metal artifacts caused minimal image distortion on MRI/MRA. The artifacts disturbed image evaluation on CT at the graft bifurcation and graft limb junction. No significant differences in mean flow were found in patients before and after stent-graft placement. Our study indicates that MRI at 1.5 T may be performed safely in patients with the (Vanguard) stent-graft. MRI/MRA provides diagnostic image information. Velocity mapping is not included in our routine protocol.
|
|
4. |
- Frankel, Jennifer, 1981-
(author)
-
Characterization of the MRI patient exposure environment and exposure assessment methods for magnetic fields in MRI scanners
- 2021
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most common imaging modalities available in modern medicine, and it is an indispensable diagnostic tool thanks to the unparalleled soft-tissue contrast and high image resolution. It is also a unique exposure environment consisting of a complex mix of magnetic fields. During an MRI scan, the patient is simultaneously exposed to a strong static magnetic field, a fast-switching gradient magnetic field, and a pulsed radiofrequency (RF) magnetic field. Transient acute effects, such as nerve excitation and tissue heating, are well known and limited by universal safety guidelines. Long-term health effects related to MRI exposure have, however, not been scientifically established, and no interaction mechanisms have been verified, despite a growing body of research on electromagnetic field exposure. Further epidemiological and experimental research on MRI exposure has been recommended but the lack of a common definition of dose or exposure metric makes evaluation of past research and the design of future experiments difficult.The objectives of this thesis were to characterize the MRI patient exposure environment in terms of the magnetic fields involved, suggest relevant exposure metrics, and introduce exposure assessment methods suitable for epidemiological and experimental research on MRI and long-term health effects.In Paper I, we discussed the MRI exposure environment and its complexity and gave an overview of the current scientific situation. In Paper II, we investigated the exposure variability between different MRI sequences and suggested patient-independent exposure metrics that describe different characteristics of the magnetic field exposure, including mean, peak, and threshold values. In Paper III, we presented three exposure assessment methods, specifically suited to the complex MRI exposure environment: a measurement-based method, a calculation-based method, and a proxy method.Papers I and II showed that MRI exams are not homogenous in terms of exposure, and exposure variability exists between the individual sequences that comprise an exam. Differences in mean exposure between sequences were several-fold, peak exposure differences up to 30-fold, and differences in threshold exposure were in some cases more than 100-fold. Furthermore, within-sequence exposure variability, related to the parameter adjustments that can be made at the scanner console before the start of a scan, gave rise to 5-to-8-fold exposure increases. Paper III showed that magnetic field models could be used to approximate the exposure at arbitrary locations inside the scanner, with slight underestimation of gradient field metrics and large variability in some RF field metrics. With improvements in accuracy and efficiency, the method could become a useful exposure assessment tool for in vitro and in vivo research as well as clinical work on medical implant safety. Our search for suitable exposure metric proxies resulted in a limited selection with low correlation between proxies and their counterpart metrics, but, with further development, the proxy method has the potential to allow for much needed exposure classification relevant to large-scale epidemiological research.The work in this thesis has contributed to increased awareness of the unique MRI exposure environment, the characteristics of the magnetic fields involved, and the inherent exposure variability in MRI exams. The metrics and methods presented are specifically suited to exposure assessment of the unique MRI environment, and may contribute to improved research quality by allowing for meaningful comparisons between study results and for experimental conditions to be easily replicated in future studies.
|
|
5. |
- Frankel, Jennifer, et al.
(author)
-
EMF exposure variation among MRI sequences from pediatric examination protocols
- 2019
-
In: Bioelectromagnetics. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0197-8462 .- 1521-186X. ; 40:1, s. 3-15
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exposure environment is unique due to the mixture and intensity of magnetic fields involved. Current safety regulations are based on well-known acute effects of heating and neuroexcitation while the scientific grounds for possible long-term effects from MRI exposure are lacking. Epidemiological research requires careful exposure characterization, and as a first step toward improved exposure assessment we set out to characterize the MRI-patient exposure environment. Seven MRI sequences were run on a 3-Tesla scanner while the radiofrequency and gradient magnetic fields were measured inside the scanner bore. The sequences were compared in terms of 14 different exposure parameters. To study within-sequence variability, we varied sequence settings such as flip angle and slice thickness one at a time, to determine if they had any impact on exposure endpoints. There were significant differences between two or more sequences for all fourteen exposure parameters. Within-sequence differences were up to 60% of the corresponding between-sequence differences, and a 5-8 fold exposure increase was caused by variations in flip angle, slice spacing, and field of view. MRI exposure is therefore not only sequence-specific but also patient- and examination occurrence-specific, a complexity that requires careful consideration for an MRI exposure assessment in epidemiological studies to be meaningful.
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
- Frankel, Jennifer, et al.
(author)
-
Measurements of the switched gradient magnetic field in MRI : A closer look at some unintuitive spatial characteristics
- 2023
-
In: iRADIOLOGY. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2834-2860 .- 2834-2879. ; 1:4, s. 390-396
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Concomitant fields are the unwanted transverse components that arise when spatial encoding gradients are applied in MRI. We measured the changing gradient magnetic field at multiple locations inside the scanner and examined the internal distribution and linearity of the three vector components of the field. Our results illustrate some not-so-obvious spatial characteristics of the gradient field, which can seem unintuitive at first glance, but are quite reasonable when considering electromagnetic theory and MRI-scanner physics constraints.
|
|
8. |
- Hansson, Boel, et al.
(author)
-
MR-safety: Evaluation of compliance with screening routines using a structured screening interview
- 2022
-
In: Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management. - : SAGE Publications. - 2516-0435 .- 2516-0443. ; 27:2, s. 76-82
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Magnetic resonance (MR) safety procedures are designed to allow patients, research subjects and personnel to enter the MR-scanner room under controlled conditions and without the risk to be harmed during the examination. Ferromagnetic objects in the MR-environment or inside the human body represent the main safety risks potentially leading to human injuries. Screening for MR-safety risks with dedicated procedures is therefore mandatory. As human errors during the screening procedure might align and lead to an incident compliance is essential. Purpose To evaluate compliance with a documented structured MR-safety screening process. Method Written and signed MR-safety screening documentation collected at a national 7T MR facility during a four-year period was evaluated for compliance of trained personnel with multi-step MR-safety routines. We analysed whether examinations were performed or why they were not performed. Data analysis further included descriptive statistics of the study population (age, gender and patient or healthy volunteer status), identification of missing documents and omitted or incorrect answers, and whether these compliance shortcomings concerned predominantly administrative or MR-safety related issues. Results Documentation of the screening process in 1819 subjects was incomplete in 19% of subjects. The most common documentation shortcoming was omitted fields. Out of 478 omitted answer-fields in 307 subjects, 36% were of administrative nature and 64% related directly to MR-safety issues. Conclusion Compliance with MR-safety screening procedures cannot be taken for granted and deficiencies to comply with screening routines were revealed. Documentation shortcomings concerned both administrative and MR-safety related issues.
|
|
9. |
- Hansson, Boel, et al.
(author)
-
Short-term effects experienced during examinations in an actively shielded 7T MR.
- 2019
-
In: Bioelectromagnetics. - : Wiley. - 1521-186X .- 0197-8462. ; 40:4, s. 234-249
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The objective of this study was to evaluate occurrence and strength of short-term effects experienced by study participants in an actively shielded (AS) 7 tesla (7T) magnetic resonance (MR) scanner, to compare results with earlier reports on passively shielded (PS) 7T MR scanners, and to outline possible healthcare strategies to improve patient compliance. Study participants (n=124) completed a web-based questionnaire directly after being examined in an AS 7T MR (n=154 examinations). Most frequently experienced short-term effects were dizziness (84%) and inconsistent movement (70%), especially while moving into or out of the magnet. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)-twitching-was experienced in 67% of research examinations and showed a dependence between strength of twitches and recorded predicted PNS values. Of the participants, 74% experienced noise levels as acceptable and the majority experienced body and room temperature as comfortable. Of the study participants, 95% felt well-informed and felt they had had good contact with the staff before the examination. Willingness to undergo a future 7T examination was high (>90%). Our study concludes short-term effects are often experienced during examinations in an AS 7T MR, leaving room for improvement in nursing care strategies to increase patient compliance. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;9999:XX-XX. © 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
|
|
10. |
- Hansson, Boel, et al.
(author)
-
Subjectively Reported Effects Experienced in an Actively Shielded 7T MRI: A Large-Scale Study.
- 2020
-
In: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. - : Wiley. - 1522-2586 .- 1053-1807. ; 52:4, s. 1265-1276
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Ultrahigh-field (UHF) MRI advances towards clinical use. Patient compliance is generally high, but few large-scale studies have investigated the effects experienced in 7T MRI systems, especially considering peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and caregiving.To evaluate the quantity, the intensity, and subjective experiences from short-term effects, focusing on the levels of comfort and compliance of subjects.Prospective.In all, 954 consecutive MRIs in 801 subjects for 3years.7T.After the 7T examination, a questionnaire was used to collect data.Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation, Mann-Whitney U-test, and t-test.The majority (63%) of subjects agreed that the MRI experience was comfortable and 93% would be willing to undergo future 7T MRI as a patient (5% undecided) and 82% for research purposes (12% undecided). The most common short-term effects experienced were dizziness (81%), inconsistent movement (68%), PNS (63%), headache (40%), nausea (32%), metallic taste (12%), and light flashes (8%). Of the subjects who reported having PNS (n = 603), 44% experienced PNS as "not uncomfortable at all," 45% as "little or very little uncomfortable," and 11% as "moderate to very much uncomfortable." Scanner room temperature was experienced more comfortable before (78%) than during (58%) examinations, and the noise level was acceptable by 90% of subjects. Anxiety before the examination was reported by 43%. Patients differed from healthy volunteers regarding an experience of headache, metallic taste, dizziness, or anxiety. Room for improvement was pointed out after 117 examinations concerning given information (n = 73), communication and sound system (n = 35), or nursing care (n = 15).Subjectively reported effects occur in actively shielded 7T MRI and include physiological responses and individual psychological issues. Although leaving room for improvement, few subjects experienced these effects being so uncomfortable that they would lead to aversion to future UHF examinations.1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
|
|