↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Persson Mikael J 1980) "

Search: WFRF:(Persson Mikael J 1980)

Result 1-10 of 89

Sort/group result

Sort by: Hits per page:

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Communicative Responsiveness and Other Central Concepts in Between-Election Democracy 2013 In: Between-Election Democracy: The representative relationship after Election Day. - Colchester : ECPR Press. - 9781907301988 Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
2.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Conditional Representation: Representative Democracy under Internal Stress 2012 In: The Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, april 2012. Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
3.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Deciding the Fair Way or Having it My Way? A New Look at Procedural Fairness Theory in the Domain of Policy Decisions. 2013 In: Uppsats presenterad vid The Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, april, 2013.. Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
4.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Medborgarnas demokratiuppfattningar 2011 In: Lycksalighetens ö. Holmberg, S., Weibull, L. & Oscarsson, H. (red). Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
5.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Off-Election Democracy: Towards an Integrative Analytical Framework 2011 In: Uppsats presenterad vid The ECPR Joint Sessions, St Gallen. Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
6.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) På folkets sida? Synen på demokrati bland journalister, politiker och medborgare 2012 In: Svenska journalister 1989-2011 / Kent Asp (red.). - Göteborg : University of Gothenburg. - 9789188212511 ; , s. 83-90 Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
7.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision Acceptance 2019 In: British Journal of Political Science. - 0007-1234 .- 1469-2112. ; 49:1, s. 291-314 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract Procedural fairness theory posits that the way in which authoritative decisions are made strongly impacts people's willingness to accept them. This article challenges this claim by contending that democratic governments can achieve little in terms of acceptance of policy decisions by the procedural means at their disposal. Instead, outcome favorability is the dominant determinant of decision acceptance. The article explicates that while central parts of procedural fairness theory are true, outcome favorability is still overwhelmingly the strongest determinant of individuals' willingness to accept authoritative decisions. It improves on previous research by locating all key variables into one causal model and testing this model using appropriate data. Findings from a large number of experiments (both vignette and field) reproduce the expected relationships from previous research and support the additional predictions.
8.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction – Does it Matter to Citizens? 2017 In: Comparative Political Studies. - : SAGE Publications. - 0010-4140 .- 1552-3829. ; 50:6, s. 739-765 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract Can politicians facilitate citizen acceptance of unwelcome policy decisions by acting responsively during the decision-making process? We suggest a framework to analyze the responsiveness-acceptance connection, and report findings from two studies designed for that purpose. First, we ran a survey experiment to examine how exogenously induced responsiveness actions affect reactions to a policy decision. Second, we conducted a case study to see how results hold up in a real-world setting. We find that responsiveness actions are rewarded provided that citizens are convinced that politicians have paid attention to their wishes and views. Responsiveness actions that signal willingness to communicate (“to listen” and “to explain”) are more effective than the action to follow majority opinion (“to adapt”). However, the responsiveness-acceptance connection is sensitive to perceptual bias; policy losers are hard pressed to accept that politicians have indeed acted responsively.
9.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Which Decision-Making Arrangements Generate the Strongest Legitimacy Beliefs? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment 2012 In: European Journal of Political Research. - : Wiley. - 1475-6765 .- 0304-4130. ; 51:6, s. 785-808 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract How can democracies satisfy citizens' demands for legitimate decision making? This article reports findings from a randomised field experiment designed to mimic decision making in large-scale democracies. Natural collectives of individuals with a shared history and future (high school classes) were studied. They were asked to make a decision about how to spend a sum of money under arrangements imposed by the researchers and distributed randomly across classes. Within this setting, empirical support for three ideas about legitimacy enhancing decision-making arrangements is tested: participatory constitution-making; personal involvement in the decision-making process; and fairness in the implementation of arrangements. Throughout the analyses it was found that personal involvement is the main factor generating legitimacy beliefs.
10.	Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al. (author) Wich constitutional arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? 2010 In: Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 22-26, 2010. Conference paper (peer-reviewed)

Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka

Permalink

Result 1-10 of 89

Refine your search

Type of publication: journal article (45); conference paper (24); book chapter (11); reports (3); other publication (3); book (2); show more...; doctoral thesis (1); show less...

Type of content: peer-reviewed (50); other academic/artistic (39)

Author/Editor: Persson, Mikael J, 1 ... (86); Oscarsson, Henrik, 1 ... (8); Solevid, Maria, 1976 (4); Lindgren, Karl-Oskar (3); Lindgren, Karl-Oskar ... (3); Oskarsson, Sven, 197 ... (3); show more...; Oskarsson, Sven (3); Andersson, Klas, 197 ... (3); Öhrvall, Richard, 19 ... (3); Zetterberg, Pär (2); Persson, Mikael, 195 ... (2); Martinsson, Johan, 1 ... (2); Erlingsson, Gissur Ó (2); Zhao, L. (1); Smedby, Örjan, 1956- (1); Mukherjee, R. (1); Zirath, Herbert, 195 ... (1); Ekman, Joakim, 1970- (1); Ekman, Joakim (1); Karlsson, J-E (1); Olsson, Jonas (1); Lindholm, Torun (1); McKelvey, Tomas, 196 ... (1); Olson, Maria (1); Erlingsson, Gissur Ó ... (1); Lindholm, Torun, 196 ... (1); Lindberg, Staffan I. ... (1); Wallin, Pontus (1); Jonsson, Lisa (1); Melin, Catarina (1); Ardung, Sven (1); Carlund, Angelica (1); Danielsson, Eva (1); Edland, Mikael (1); Ekliden, Jim (1); Fransson, Maria, 198 ... (1); Gustavsson, Ann-Mari ... (1); Hallabro, Gustav (1); Lindquist, Peter (1); Olofsson, Helen (1); Persson, Martin, 198 ... (1); Reimer, Joakim, 1982 (1); Sigvardsson, Emma, 1 ... (1); Svenningsson, H (1); Svensson, Sara (1); Säfmark, Josefine (1); Wojtyla, J (1); Östman, Mats (1); Dahlberg, Stefan, 19 ... (1); Wang, Chunliang, 198 ... (1); show less...

University: University of Gothenburg (88); Uppsala University (16); Linköping University (5); Chalmers University of Technology (2); Royal Institute of Technology (1); Stockholm University (1); show more...; Södertörn University (1); show less...

Language: English (70); Swedish (19)

Research subject (UKÄ/SCB): Social Sciences (85); Engineering and Technology (2); Medical and Health Sciences (2); Natural sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - National Library Systems
LIBRIS.kb.se

pil uppåt

Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view