| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Figueiredo, Margarida L A, 1986-, et al.
(author)
-
HP1a Recruitment to Promoters Is Independent of H3K9 Methylation in Drosophila melanogaster
- 2012
-
In: PLOS Genetics. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1553-7390 .- 1553-7404. ; 8:11, s. e1003061-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) proteins, recognized readers of the heterochromatin mark methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me), are important regulators of heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing and chromosome structure. In Drosophila melanogaster three histone lysine methyl transferases (HKMTs) are associated with the methylation of H3K9: Su(var)3-9, Setdb1, and G9a. To probe the dependence of HP1a binding on H3K9me, its dependence on these three HKMTs, and the division of labor between the HKMTs, we have examined correlations between HP1a binding and H3K9me patterns in wild type and null mutants of these HKMTs. We show here that Su(var)3-9 controls H3K9me-dependent binding of HP1a in pericentromeric regions, while Setdb1 controls it in cytological region 2L:31 and (together with POF) in chromosome 4. HP1a binds to the promoters and within bodies of active genes in these three regions. More importantly, however, HP1a binding at promoters of active genes is independent of H3K9me and POF. Rather, it is associated with heterochromatin protein 2 (HP2) and open chromatin. Our results support a hypothesis in which HP1a nucleates with high affinity independently of H3K9me in promoters of active genes and then spreads via H3K9 methylation and transient looping contacts with those H3K9me target sites.
|
|
| 3. |
- Figueiredo, Margarida L. A., et al.
(author)
-
Non-coding roX RNAs prevent the binding of the MSL-complex to heterochromatic regions
- 2014
-
In: PLOS Genetics. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1553-7390 .- 1553-7404. ; 10:12, s. e1004865-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Long non-coding RNAs contribute to dosage compensation in both mammals and Drosophila by inducing changes in the chromatin structure of the X-chromosome. In Drosophila melanogaster, roX1 and roX2 are long non-coding RNAs that together with proteins form the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex, which coats the entire male X-chromosome and mediates dosage compensation by increasing its transcriptional output. Studies on polytene chromosomes have demonstrated that when both roX1 and roX2 are absent, the MSL-complex becomes less abundant on the male X-chromosome and is relocated to the chromocenter and the 4thchromosome. Here we address the role of roX RNAs in MSL-complex targeting and the evolution of dosage compensation in Drosophila. We performed ChIP-seq experiments which showed that MSL-complex recruitment to high affinity sites (HAS) on the X-chromosome is independent of roX and that the HAS sequence motif is conserved in D. simulans. Additionally, a complete and enzymatically active MSL-complex is recruited to six specific genes on the 4thchromosome. Interestingly, our sequence analysis showed that in the absence of roX RNAs, the MSL-complex has an affinity for regions enriched in Hoppel transposable elements and repeats in general. We hypothesize that roX mutants reveal the ancient targeting of the MSL-complex and propose that the role of roX RNAs is to prevent the binding of the MSL-complex to heterochromatin.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Philip, Philge, 1983-
(author)
-
Mining DNA elements involved in targeting of chromatin modifiers
- 2014
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Background: In all higher organisms, the nuclear DNA is condensed into nucleosomes that consist of DNA wrapped around a core of highly conserved histone proteins. DNA bound to histones and other structural proteins form the chromatin. Generally, only few regions of DNA are accessible and most of the time RNA polymerase and other DNA binding proteins have to overcome this compaction to initiate transcription. Several proteins are involved in making the chromatin more compact or open. Such chromatin-modifying proteins make distinct post-translational modifications of histones – especially in the histone tails – to alter their affinity to DNA. Aim: The main aim of my thesis work is to study the targeting of chromatin modifiers important for correct gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies). Primary DNA sequences, chromatin associated proteins, transcription, and non-coding RNAs are all likely to be involved in targeting mechanisms. This thesis work involves the development of new computational methods for identification of DNA motifs and protein factors involved in the targeting of chromatin modifiers. Targeting and functional analysis of two chromatin modifiers, namely male-specific lethal (MSL) complex and CREB-binding protein (CBP) are specifically studied. The MSL complex is a protein complex that mediates dosage compensation in flies. CBP protein is known as a transcriptional co-regulator in metazoans and it has histone acetyl transferase activity and CBP has been used to predict novel enhancers. Results: My studies of the binding sites of MSL complex shows that promoters and coding sequences of MSL-bound genes on the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster can influence the spreading of the complex along the X-chromosome. Analysis of MSL binding sites when two non-coding roX RNAs are mutated shows that MSL-complex recruitment to high-affinity sites on the Xchromosome is independent of roX, and the role of roX RNAs is to prevent binding to repeats in autosomal sites. Functional analysis of MSL-bound genes using their dosage compensation status shows that the function of the MSL complex is to enhance the expression of short housekeeping genes, but MSL-independent mechanisms exist to achieve complete dosage compensation. Studies of the binding sites of the CBP protein show that, in early embryos, Dorsal in cooperation with GAGA factor (GAF) and factors like Medea and Dichaete target CBP to its binding sites. In the S2 cell line, GAF is identified as the targeting factor of CBP at promoters and enhancers, and GAF and CBP together are found to induce high levels of polymerase II pausing at promoters. In another study using integrated data analysis, CBP binding sites could be classified into polycomb protein binding sites, repressed enhancers, insulator protein-bound regions, active promoters, and active enhancers, and this suggested different potential roles for CBP. A new approach was also developed to eliminate technical bias in skewed experiments. Our study shows that in the case of skewed datasets it is always better to identify non-altered variables and to normalize the data using only such variables.
|
|
