1. |
- Griska, Vytautas, et al.
(author)
-
Long-term neurological and neurocognitive impairments after tick-borne encephalitis in Lithuania - a prospective study
- 2024
-
In: INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - 2374-4235 .- 2374-4243.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BackgroundThe aim of this study was to characterise long-term neurological and neurocognitive sequelae after tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in adults.Methods98 prospective consecutive TBE patients, classified by disease severity, were included. Immediate outcomes were evaluated with Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and Rankin Scale (RS). After 6 and 18 months, long-term disability was evaluated using Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) and neurocognitive assessment was performed with Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), measuring processing speed, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning/problem solving and social cognition. The MCCB results were compared to healthy age, gender and education-matched controls.ResultsMild, moderate, and severe TBE was diagnosed in 53.1%, 38.8%, and 8.2% of cases, respectively. At discharge, 25.5% of the patients had major or moderate impairments (GOS) and various levels of disability in 34.7% (RS). Up to 18 months from the onset of TBE, over 20% remained with slight to moderate disability (MRS). GOS, RS and MRS scores correlated with disease severity. At 6 months after the onset, TBE patients scored significantly lower than controls in processing speed, verbal, and visual learning. Two latter domains were significantly more impaired in patients with mild TBE. Patients aged 18-39 performed significantly worse in attention/vigilance and working memory, whereas aged 60+ in verbal learning. A year later, significant improvement was observed in six of seven cognitive domains.ConclusionsLong-term neurological sequelae persist in a substantial proportion of TBE patients with significant impairment in several cognitive domains, especially in younger patients and even after mild TBE.
|
|
2. |
- Kasten, Erich, et al.
(author)
-
European Clinical Neuropsychology : Role in Healthcare and Access to Neuropsychological Services
- 2021
-
In: Healthcare. - : MDPI. - 2227-9032. ; 9:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This study analyzed aspects of the work of clinical neuropsychologists across Europe. There are no published comparisons between European countries regarding the nature of clinical neuropsychologists' work. Forty-one national psychological and neuropsychological societies were approached, of which 31 (76%) responded. Data from seven countries with less than 10 neuropsychologists were excluded. A license is required to practice clinical neuropsychology in 50% of the countries. Clinical neuropsychologists work independently in 62.5%. Diagnostic/assessment work is the most frequently reported activity (54%). Most neuropsychologists work in public hospitals, followed by health centers. Adult neuropsychology was the most frequent area of activity. Services in public institutions are covered by public entities (45.8%), or by a combination of patient funds and public entities (29.2%) and only 4.2% by the patient; whereas services in private institutions are covered by the patient (26.1%) and the combination of patient, public entities (21.7%) or patient and private entities (17.4%). The data suggest that the number of neuropsychologists working across European countries is considerably low in comparison to other medical professionals. The results of the survey identified similar aspects of neuropsychologists' work, despite variations in terms of reimbursement and mechanisms, reflecting economic and healthcare differences. Estimates on the number of clinical neuropsychologists suggest insufficient access to neuropsychological services.
|
|
3. |
- Kosmidis, Mary H., et al.
(author)
-
Core Competencies in Clinical Neuropsychology as a Training Model in Europe
- 2022
-
In: Frontiers in Psychology. - : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 1664-1078. ; 13
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The multitude of training models and curricula for the specialty of clinical neuropsychology around the world has led to organized activities to develop a framework of core competencies to ensure sufficient expertise among entry-level professionals in the field. The Standing Committee on Clinical Neuropsychology of the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations is currently working toward developing a specialty certification in clinical neuropsychology to establish a cross-national standard against which to measure levels of equivalency and uniformity in competence and service provision among professionals in the field. Through structured interviews with experts from 28 European countries, we explored potential areas of core competency. Specifically, questions pertained to the perceived importance of a series of foundational, functional, and other competencies, as well as current training standards and practices, and optimal standards. Our findings revealed considerable agreement (about three quarters and above) on academic and clinical training, despite varied actual training requirements currently, with fewer respondents relegating importance to training in teaching, supervision, and research (a little over half), and even fewer to skills related to management, administration, and advocacy (fewer than half). European expert clinical neuropsychologists were in agreement with previous studies (including those conducted in the United States, Australia, and other countries) regarding the importance of sound theoretical and clinical training but management, administrative, and advocacy skills were not central to their perspective of a competent specialist in clinical neuropsychology. Establishing a specialty certificate in clinical neuropsychology based on core competencies may enable mobility of clinical neuropsychologists across Europe, and, perhaps, provide an impetus for countries with limited criteria to reconsider their training requirements and harmonize their standards with others.
|
|