| 1. |
- Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov, et al.
(author)
-
Congestion charges and retail revenues : results from the Stockholm road pricing trial
- 2009
-
In: Transportation Research Part A. - : Elsevier. - 0965-8564 .- 1879-2375. ; 43:3, s. 306-309
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This paper studies the impact of the Stockholm road pricing trial on retail revenues. The analysis is performed using revenue data from 14 shopping malls, 9 within the tool area and 5 outside the tool area. The data also include revenue data from a sample of retail stores located along the main shopping streets in Stockholm. The results show that the Stockholm road pricing trial did not negatively affect retail revenue, neither in shopping malls nor in the sample of retail stores.
|
|
| 2. |
- Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov, et al.
(author)
-
Congestion charges in Stockholm : how have they affected retail revenues?
- 2013
-
In: Transportmetrica A. - Hong Kong : Taylor and Francis. - 2324-9935 .- 2324-9943. ; 9:3, s. 259-268
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Did the introduction of congestion charges in Stockholm city reduce retail revenues? Data from 20 shopping malls - 8 within the toll area, and 12 outside the tool area - and from a sample of retail stores located along the main shopping streets was analyzed using an intervention-control approach. Favorable outcomes, such as reduced traffic, less emissions of carbon-dioxide, and perceived improvements in air quality and accessibility, do not seem to have been offset by reduced revenues for retailers located within the toll area.
|
|
| 3. |
- Rämme, Ulf, et al.
(author)
-
Market reform and food prices : Did the 1912 Slaughterhouse Reform affect meat prices in Stockholm?
- 2015
-
In: International Review of Retail Distribution & Consumer Research. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0959-3969 .- 1466-4402. ; 25:2, s. 204-213
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In February 1912, the Slaughterhouse Reform was introduced by the city of Stockholm to address the unsanitary conditions prevalent in the production and sale of meat, and thereby improve food safety. However, opponents argued that the reform would lead to price increases, and that poorer households would therefore replace meat with cheaper products. We find that meat prices increased by 21% due to the introduction of the reform, which meant that consumers had to pay a substantial cost for improved food safety within the boundaries of Stockholm.
|
|
