SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Ritterband L.) "

Search: WFRF:(Ritterband L.)

  • Result 1-3 of 3
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  • Ritterband, L., et al. (author)
  • Challenges, controversies, and the future of developing, evaluating, and implementing Internet interventions
  • 2016
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Internet intervention research has been well established in the literature over the past two decades. The hundreds, if not thousands, of high quality research trials that have been conducted and published have convincingly demonstrated feasibility, efficacy and even effectiveness. The next decade will be a critical one for the field with numerous obstacles, barriers, disputes and debates to overcome. This talk will highlight many of the known challenges and controversies as well as key areas that will need to be part of future research. Furthermore, each of these areas overlap, resulting in additional topics of needed focus. Challenges include funding, recruitment, and conflict of interests to manage; controversies include best practices for iterative development, the relationship between usage and outcome, and public concerns of technology replacing jobs; issues that intersect with both challenges and controversies include how best to address the digital divide, the use of social networking, and how to determine the best control and comparison groups in ehealth research; future issues include a need to focus on deconstruction and dissemination trials, internationalization of interventions, and a greater emphasis on cost effectiveness; issues that traverse challenges and the future include a need for greater scientific underpinnings to interventions, improving the taxonomy and overall definitions used to define applications, and how best to maintain and sustain programs; controversies/future issues include the problem of so many programs continuing to be developed and made available with little to no scientific validity; and finally, issues that cross challenges, controversies and the future include the ongoing discussions of support, meta-analyses, and stepped care. Although not comprehensive, this list will provide a useful start for discussion and help guide research for the coming years.
  •  
3.
  • Thorndike, Frances P., et al. (author)
  • Web-based measurement : Effect of completing single or multiple items per webpage
  • 2009
  • In: Computers in human behavior. - : Elsevier. - 0747-5632 .- 1873-7692. ; 25:2, s. 393-401
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The current study was conducted to determine whether participants respond differently to online questionnaires presenting all items on a single webpage versus questionnaires presenting only one item per page, and whether participants prefer one format over the other. Of participants seeking self-help treatment on the Internet (for depression, social phobia, or panic disorder), 710 completed four questionnaires (Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Quality of Life Index, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) on the Internet on two occasions. The questionnaires were either presented with one questionnaire on one webpage (e.g., BDI on one webpage) or on multiple webpages (e.g., BDI on 21 webpages with one item each). Results suggest that the four web questionnaires measure the same construct across diagnostic group (depression, social phobia, panic), presentation type (single versus multiple items per page), and order of presentation (which format first). Within each diagnostic group, factor means for all questionnaires were equivalent across presentation method and time. Furthermore, factor means varied as expected across samples (e.g., depressed group scored higher on BDI), providing evidence of construct validity. The majority of participants in each diagnostic group preferred the single item per page format, even though this format required more time.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-3 of 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view