| 1. |
- Nilsson, Desirée, et al.
(author)
-
In the Streets and at the Table : Civil Society Coordination during Peace Negotiations
- 2020
-
In: International Negotiation. - : Brill. - 1382-340X .- 1571-8069. ; 25:2, s. 225-251
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- When bringing armed conflicts to a peaceful end, the inclusion of civil society in peacemaking is a vital task. However, whereas previous research on civil society inclusion has made significant advancements, surprisingly little attention has been paid to analyzing how civil resistance and mass action may interact with more elite-driven approaches during peace processes. This study addresses this research gap by examining the interplay between elite and mass-based civil society approaches in three different peace processes in civil wars in Africa in the post-Cold War period: Liberia, the Central African Republic (CAR), and Burundi. We advance the literature by developing a framework that focuses on coordination of these different efforts and we explore this interplay empirically. With this study, we aim to broaden the research agenda, allowing for future synergies at the research frontier of mass action and the inclusion of civil society in peace processes.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ruus, Anton, et al.
(author)
-
United Nations peacekeeping operations and the security sector reform : challenges and opportunities
- 2019
-
In: Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento. - 0556-6916 .- 2236-5567. ; 40:137, s. 105-124
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Post-conflict societies struggle with several interlocking problems that often relate to security and legitimacy. To address these issues, the international community has often turned to Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs) or Security Sector Reform (SSR) programs. In this article, the authors present different aspects of these evolving concepts and what theoretical problems each tool aim to resolve. Furthermore, a symbiosis is found to exist between the ability of PKOs to provide protection in the immediate aftermath of conflict and the long-term benefits that SSR provides through the creation of accountable, efficient and professional security institutions. PKOs contribute to creating necessary preconditions successful SSR implementation, namely a safe environment. However, four additional preconditions must be met: a common vision, external support, local ownership and donor collaboration. Inability to provide these conditions will lead to a sub-optimal implementation and a security sector reform failing to deliver legitimate and professional institutions.
|
|
