| 1. |
- Lang, Niklaus P., et al.
(author)
-
Implant surfaces and design (Working Group 4)
- 2009
-
In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. - 0905-7161 .- 1600-0501. ; 20 Suppl 4, s. 228-231
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: The remit of this working group (4) was to update existing knowledge on the effects of implant surface topography, composition and design on bone integration and re-osseointegration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on five narrative reviews that were performed following a defined search strategy, clinical implications as well as suggestions for further research have been formulated. RESULTS: The results and conclusions of the review processes in the following papers together with the group consensus, clinical implications and directions for future research are presented: 1. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration. 2. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration (two reviews). 3. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone level alterations. 4. Re-osseointegration onto previously contaminated implant surfaces.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lang, Niklaus P., et al.
(author)
-
Implant surfaces and design (Working Group 4)
- 2009
-
In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. - : Blackwell Munksgaard. - 0905-7161 .- 1600-0501. ; 20 Suppl 4, s. 228-231
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: The remit of this working group (4) was to update existing knowledge on the effects of implant surface topography, composition and design on bone integration and re-osseointegration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on five narrative reviews that were performed following a defined search strategy, clinical implications as well as suggestions for further research have been formulated. RESULTS: The results and conclusions of the review processes in the following papers together with the group consensus, clinical implications and directions for future research are presented: 1. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration. 2. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration (two reviews). 3. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone level alterations. 4. Re-osseointegration onto previously contaminated implant surfaces.
|
|
| 3. |
- Schliephake, Henning, et al.
(author)
-
Drugs and diseases : Summary and consensus statements of group 1. The 5(th) EAO Consensus Conference 2018
- 2018
-
In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0905-7161 .- 1600-0501. ; 29:Suppl 18, s. 93-99
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: The task of this working group was to update the knowledge about the use of drugs and biologicals affecting healing of soft tissue and bone during implant treatment or procedures associated with it. Moreover, the impact of titanium particles and biocorrosion on complications and implant survival has been analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature in the areas of interest (platelet concentrates, antiresorptive drugs as well as implant-host interaction) was screened using systematic reviews for the former two areas, whereas a narrative critical review was performed for the latter topic. Two manuscripts on platelet concentrates, one manuscript on antiresorptive drugs and one manuscript on the effects of biocorrosion, were presented for group analysis with subsequent discussion in the plenum and final consensus approval. RESULTS: Results and conclusions of the individual reviews of the three topics are presented in the respective papers. Conclusions of the group on strengths and weaknesses of available evidence as well as consensus statements and directions for further research are provided in this study. The following papers were subject to group discussions and formed the basis for the consensus statements: Stahli A, Strauss FJ, Gruber R. () The use of platelet-rich-plasma to enhance the outcomes of implant-related therapies: a systematic review Strauss FJ, Stahli A, Gruber R. (2018) The use of platelet-rich-fibrin to enhance the outcomes of implant-related therapies: a systematic review Mombelli A, Hashim D, Cionca N. () What is the impact of titanium particles and bio-corrosion on implant survival and complications? A critical review Stavropoulos A, Bertl K, Pietschmann P, Pandis N, Morten Schiodt, Klinge B. () The effect of antiresorptive drugs on implant therapy: a systematic review.
|
|
| 4. |
- Esposito, Marco, 1965, et al.
(author)
-
Editorial: Supplement issues.
- 2011
-
In: European journal of oral implantology. - 1756-2406. ; 4:5
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 5. |
- Jensen, Thomas, et al.
(author)
-
Sinusløftprocedure med Bio-Oss alene eller Bio-Oss blandet med autolog knogle som transplantationsmateriale : En systematisk oversigtsartikel med fokus på dyreeksperimentelle undersøgelser
- 2013
-
In: Tandlægebladet. - : Dansk Tandlægeforening. - 0039-9353. ; 117:3, s. 194-194
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Formål Formålet med denne systematiske gennemgang af litteraturen var at teste hypotesen, at der ingen forskel er på anvendelsen af Bio-Oss alene eller Bio-Oss blandet med autolog knogle som transplantationsmateriale til sinusløftprocedure ved lateral vindueteknik baseret på dyreeksperimentelle undersøgelser. Materialer og metoder En elektronisk litteratursøgning i MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase og Cochrane kombineret med manuel søgning af relevante tidsskrifter blev udført med henblik på at inkludere dyreeksperimentelle undersøgelser offentliggjort på engelsk fra 1. januar 1990 til 1. juni 2010. Søgningen identificerede 879 undersøgelser, og 14 undersøgelser opfyldte inklusionskriterierne. Resultater Den systematiske gennemgang af de inkluderede undersøgelser viste, at stabiliteten af transplantationsmaterialets volumen forbedres signifikant ved øget mængde Bio-Oss i transplantationsmaterialet. Knogleregeneration, knogleimplantatkontakt, biomekaniske undersøgelser af implantatstabilitet og nedbrydning af Bio-Oss efter sinusløftprocedure ved de to behandlingsmodaliteter er ikke sammenlignet i dyreeksperimentelle undersøgelser. Konklusion Hypotesen om ingen forskel på anvendelsen af Bio-Oss alene eller Bio-Oss blandet med autologt knogletransplantat i forbindelse med sinusløftprocedure kunne hverken bekræftes eller forkastes baseret på de eksisterende dyreeksperimentelle undersøgelser. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:114-20.
|
|
| 6. |
- Jensen, Thomas, et al.
(author)
-
Sinusløftprocedure med Bio-Oss alene eller Bio-Oss blandet med autolog knogle som transplantationsmateriale : En systematisk oversigtsartikel med fokus på humane undersøgelser
- 2013
-
In: Tandlægebladet. - : Dansk Tandlægeforening. - 0039-9353. ; 117:5, s. 384-385
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Formål Formålet med denne systematiske gennemgang af litteraturen var at teste hypotesen, at der ingen forskel er på implantatbehandlingens resultat, når der anvendes henholdsvis Bio-Oss alene eller Bio-Oss blandet med autolog knogle som transplantationsmateriale til sinusløftprocedure ved lateral vindueteknik baseret på humane undersøgelser. Materialer og metoder En elektronisk litteratursøgning i MEDLINE (PubMed) kombineret med manuel søgning af relevante tidsskrifter blev udført med henblik på at inkludere kliniske undersøgelser offentliggjort på engelsk fra 1. januar 1990 til 1. juni 2010. Søgningen identificerede 879 undersøgelser, og 35 undersøgelser opfyldte inklusionskriterierne. Resultater Den systematiske gennemgang af de inkluderede undersøgelser viste, at det ikke var muligt at foretage en metaanalyse på grund af betydelig variation i de inkluderede studier. Endvidere kunne der ikke identificeres langtidsundersøgelser, der sammenlignede sinusløftprocedure med de to behandlingsmodaliteter. Desuden kunne der ikke identificeres undersøgelser, hvor overlevelsen af suprastrukturen efter de to behandlingsprocedurer blev sammenlignet. Den etårige implantatoverlevelse blev sammenlignet i en enkelt undersøgelse, og der kunne ikke påvises statistisk signifikant forskel. Implantatoverlevelsen var således 96 % med Bio-Oss alene og 94 % med en blanding af 80 % Bio-Oss og 20 % autolog knogle fra underkæben. Tilsætning af en begrænset mængde autolog knogle til Bio-Oss syntes ikke at øge mængden af nydannet knogle eller knogleimplantatkontakten sammenlignet med Bio-Oss alene. Konklusion Hypotesen om ingen forskel på anvendelsen af Bio-Oss alene eller Bio-Oss blandet med autologt knogletransplantat i forbindelse med sinusløftprocedure kunne derfor hverken bekræftes eller forkastes baseret på de eksisterende humane undersøgelser. Der er således behov for supplerende langtidsundersøgelser med fokus på overlevelsen af suprastrukturer og implantater ved de to behandlingsmodaliteter, før endelige konklusioner kan drages. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:263-73.
|
|
| 7. |
- Schou, Søren, et al.
(author)
-
Periimplantitis. Et stort klinisk problem?
- 2015
-
In: Aktuel nordisk odontologi. - 1902-3545. ; 40, s. 171-184
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The occurrence of peri-implantitis has been assessed in several studies. Huge variations in the prevalence of peri-implantitis have been reported, mainly due to variations in the patients included in the studies as well as in the definition of peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis seems to be a significant clinical problem due to the increasing use of implants, especially in patients with various known risk factors. In addition, treatment of peri-implantitis is still complex and unpredictable, especially when advanced peri-implantitis lesions have developed. Moreover, the peri-implantitis lesion may be so advanced that implant removal is the only treatment modality available. Due to the advanced peri-implantitis-induced alveolar bone loss, complex bone regenerative procedures are frequently required before new implants can be inserted. Therefore, early diagnosis and adequate treatment of peri-implantitis are extremely important to minimize the risk of advanced disease development. Moreover, focus on known risk factors is also important, including meticulous infection control before implant treatment in patients with tooth loss due to periodontitis, optimal implant treatment, optimal oral hygiene, and a systematic maintenance care program.
|
|
| 8. |
- Schou, Søren, et al.
(author)
-
Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
- 2004
-
In: The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. - 0882-2786. ; 19, s. 140-9
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis lesions can be performed in cases with considerable pocket formation (larger than 5 mm) and bone loss after the acute infection has been resolved and proper oral hygiene has been instituted. A literature review was conducted to ascertain current knowledge about surgical treatment options for peri-implantitis around commercially pure titanium implants. Recently reported animal studies involving implants with a rough surface indicate that considerable bone regeneration and re-osseointegration can be obtained by using membrane-covered autogenous bone graft particles. However, comparisons of the treatment outcomes in studies involving humans and animals are difficult because of differences in implant type, graft type, and evaluation protocols. In addition, different treatment procedures, including implant surface decontamination methods, have been used. Therefore, further long-term studies in humans involving sufficient numbers of subjects are needed to provide a solid basis for recommendations regarding the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Moreover, the encouraging treatment outcomes of regenerative procedures recently revealed in animal experiments and applied in the treatment of peri-implantitis around implants with sandblasted/acid-etched surfaces have not yet been documented for implants with other surfaces, especially turned surfaces. Numerous implant surface decontamination methods have been suggested as part of the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Decontamination of affected implants with titanium plasma-sprayed or sandblasted/acid-etched surfaces may most easily and effectively be achieved by applying gauze soaked alternately in chlorhexidine and saline.
|
|
