1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Smits, Anne, et al.
(author)
-
Current knowledge, challenges and innovations in developmental pharmacology: A combined conect4children Expert Group and European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology White Paper.
- 2021
-
In: British journal of clinical pharmacology. - : Wiley. - 1365-2125 .- 0306-5251. ; 88:12, s. 4965-84
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Developmental pharmacology describes the impact of maturation on drug disposition (pharmacokinetics, PK) and drug effects (pharmacodynamics, PD) throughout the paediatric age range. This paper, written by a multidisciplinary group of experts, summarizes current knowledge, and provides suggestions to pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies and academicians on how to incorporate the latest knowledge regarding developmental pharmacology and innovative techniques into neonatal and paediatric drug development. Biological aspects of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion throughout development are summarized. Although this area made enormous progress during the last two decades, remaining knowledge gaps were identified. Minimal risk and burden designs allow for optimally informative but minimally invasive PK sampling, while concomitant profiling of drug metabolites may provide additional insight in the unique PK behaviour in children. Furthermore, developmental PD needs to be considered during drug development, which is illustrated by disease- and/or target organ-specific examples. Identifying and testing PD targets and effects in special populations, and application of age- and/or population-specific assessment tools are discussed. Drug development plans also need to incorporate innovative techniques such as preclinical models to study therapeutic strategies, and shift from sequential enrolment of subgroups, to more rational designs. To stimulate appropriate research plans, illustrations of specific PK/PD-related as well as drug safety-related challenges during drug development are provided. The suggestions made in this joint paper of the Innovative Medicines Initiative conect4children Expert group on Developmental Pharmacology and the European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology, should facilitate all those involved in drug development.
|
|
5. |
- Albers, J.M.C., et al.
(author)
-
Treatment strategy, disease activity, and outcome in four cohorts of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis
- 2001
-
In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 60:5, s. 453-458
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective-To compare four different inception cohorts of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with respect to treatment strategies, disease activity, and outcome during a five year follow up period. Method-Data from cohorts of patients with early RA, with a standardised assessment at least every six months for five years from four different centres, were included in one database. Owing to slight differences in the individual study designs, linearly interpolated values were calculated to complete the standard follow up schedule. Results-Despite similar inclusion criteria, significant differences in demographic factors and baseline disease activity were found between the different cohorts. During the follow up an aggressive treatment strategy was followed in the Dutch and Finnish cohort, an intermediate strategy in the British cohort, and a conservative strategy in the Swedish cohort. A significant improvement in disease activity was seen in all cohorts, though the most rapid and striking improvement was seen in those receiving aggressive treatment. This resulted in less radiographic destruction in the long run. Conclusion-This observational study of cohorts of patients with early RA confirms that early aggressive treatment results not only in a more rapid reduction of disease activity but also in less radiographic progression in the long term.
|
|
6. |
- De Kort, A. M., et al.
(author)
-
Decreased Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid beta 38, 40, 42, and 43 Levels in Sporadic and Hereditary Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
- 2023
-
In: Annals of neurology. - : Wiley. - 0364-5134 .- 1531-8249. ; 93:6, s. 1173-86
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: Vascular amyloid beta (A beta) accumulation is the hallmark of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). The composition of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of CAA patients may serve as a diagnostic biomarker of CAA. We studied the diagnostic potential of the peptides A beta 38, A beta 40, A beta 42, and A beta 43 in patients with sporadic CAA (sCAA), hereditary Dutch-type CAA (D-CAA), and Alzheimer disease (AD).Methods: A beta peptides were quantified by immunoassays in a discovery group (26 patients with sCAA and 40 controls), a validation group (40 patients with sCAA, 40 patients with AD, and 37 controls), and a group of 22 patients with D-CAA and 54 controls. To determine the diagnostic accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: We found decreased levels of all A beta peptides in sCAA patients and D-CAA patients compared to controls. The difference was most prominent for A beta 42 (AUC of sCAA vs controls for discovery: 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99; for validation: 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.99) and A beta 43 (AUC of sCAA vs controls for discovery: 0.95, 95% CI = 0.88-1.00; for validation: 0.91, 95% CI = 0.83-1.0). All A beta peptides except A beta 43 were also decreased in sCAA compared to AD (CSF A beta 38: AUC = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.93; CSF A beta 40: AUC = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80-0.96; CSF A beta 42: AUC = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66-0.92).Interpretation: A combined biomarker panel of CSF A beta 38, A beta 40, A beta 42, and A beta 43 has potential to differentiate sCAA from AD and controls, and D-CAA from controls. ANN NEUROL 2023
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
|
|