| 1. |
- Jónsson, Kristján, et al.
(author)
-
Perioperative stroke and survival in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a SWEDEHEART study
- 2022
-
In: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1010-7940 .- 1873-734X. ; 62:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVES Perioperative stroke is a severe complication of cardiac surgery. We assessed the incidence of stroke over time, the association between stroke and mortality and identified preoperative factors independently associated with perioperative stroke, in a large nationwide cardiac surgery population. METHODS All patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Sweden 2006-2017 were included in a registry-based observational cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess associations between perioperative stroke and mortality and to identify factors associated with stroke. The median follow-up was 6 years (range 0-12). RESULTS There were 441 perioperative strokes in 36 898 patients. The mean incidence was 1.2% and decreased marginally over time [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.97 per year (95% confidence interval 0.94-1.00), P = 0.035]. Stroke patients had a higher overall mortality risk during follow-up [adjusted hazard ratio 2.30 (2.00-2.64), P < 0.001], with the highest risk during the first 30 postoperative days [adjusted hazard ratio (7.29 (5.58-9.54), P < 0.001]. The strongest independent preoperative factors associated with stroke were prior cardiac surgery [adjusted OR 2.89 (1.40-5.96)], critical preoperative condition [adjusted OR 2.55 (1.73-3.76)], previous stroke [adjusted OR 1.77 (1.35-2.33)], preoperative angina requiring intravenous nitrates [adjusted OR 1.67 (1.28-2.17)], peripheral vascular disease [OR 1.63 (1.25-2.13)] and advanced age [OR 1.05 (1.03-1.06) per year]. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of perioperative stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting has remained stable. Patients with perioperative stroke had a markedly higher adjusted risk of death early after surgery. The risk declined over time but remained higher during the entire follow-up period.
|
|
| 2. |
- Magnusson, Jesper, et al.
(author)
-
Long-term Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridge to Lung Transplantation After COVID-19
- 2022
-
In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 0003-4975 .- 1552-6259. ; 113:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This report describes a patient with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and irreversible lung destruction who underwent successful lung transplantation after 138 days of bridging with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. The case exemplifies that lung transplantation may be a possibility after very long-term coronavirus disease 2019 care, even if the patient is initially an unsuitable candidate. (C) 2022 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc.
|
|
| 3. |
- Wierup, P, et al.
(author)
-
Ex vivo evaluation of nonacceptable donor lungs
- 2006
-
In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1552-6259 .- 0003-4975. ; 81:2, s. 460-466
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background. Only a minority of the potential candidates for lung donation are considered suitable, using current evaluation methods. A new method for ex vivo evaluation, with the potential for reconditioning of marginal and nonacceptable lungs, has been developed. This is a report of the ex vivo evaluation of six donor lungs deemed nonacceptable (arterial oxygen pressure less than 40 kPa) by the Scandiatransplant, Eurotransplant, and UK transplant organizations. Methods. The lungs are perfused ex vivo with Steen solution, a lung evaluation-preservation solution, mixed with red blood cells to a hematocrit of 15%. This extracellular solution is designed to have an optimal colloid osmotic pressure so that physiologic pressure and flow can be maintained without development of pulmonary edema. An oxygenator connected to the extracorporeal circuit maintains a normal mixed venous blood gas level in the perfusate. The lungs are ventilated and evaluated through analyses of pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygenation capacity, and arterial carbon dioxide pressure minus end-tidal carbon dioxide difference. Results. The arterial oxygen pressure (inspired oxygen fraction, 1.0) increased from 27 kPa (range, 17 to 34 kPa) in situ in the organ donor at the referring hospital to 57 kPa (range, 39 to 66 kPa) during the ex vivo evaluation. The pulmonary vascular resistance varied from 3.2 to 5.7 Wood units, and the arterial carbon dioxide pressure minus end-tidal carbon dioxide difference was in the range of 1 to 2.5 kPa. Conclusions. The arterial oxygen pressure improves significantly in this model. This ex vivo evaluation model is a valuable addition to the armamentarium in finding acceptable lungs in a donor population with inferior arterial oxygen pressure values.
|
|
