SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Stavrianakis Anna) "

Search: WFRF:(Stavrianakis Anna)

  • Result 1-4 of 4
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  • Salter, Mark, et al. (author)
  • Race and racism in critical security studies
  • 2021
  • In: Security Dialogue. - : SAGE Publications. - 0967-0106 .- 1460-3640. ; 52:1 (suppl), s. 3-7
  • Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
    • In the current moment, we are witnessing a resurgent political urgency around demands to overthrow the inequities that are entrenched in oppressive structural formations such as racism and colonialism. Debates about race and racism are also unfolding in academia. While there has been a long tradition of speaking plainly about race within international relations (Doty, 1993; Grovogui, 2001), the past decade has seen a re-engagement not just with race as an analytical category but also with racism (Anievas et al., 2015; Muppidi, 2018; Rutazibwa, 2016; Vitalis, 2015), frequently articulated in terms of, or alongside calls for, the decolonization of academia.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Stavrianakis, Anna, et al. (author)
  • Militarism and security: Dialogue, possibilities and limits
  • 2018
  • In: Security Dialogue. - : SAGE Publications. - 0967-0106 .- 1460-3640. ; 49:1-2, s. 3-18
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • While attention to security has grown exponentially over the last few decades, militarism – the preparation for and normalization and legitimation of war – has not received the widespread and sustained focus it warrants in mainstream or critical circles. Rather than stake a claim for one concept over the other, however, this article – and the special issue to which it serves as an introduction – asks how we are to understand the relationship between security and militarism, both as analytical tools and as objects of analysis. We examine, first, what analytical and political work militarism and security do as concepts, and how they can be mobilized methodologically; second, what the possibilities are of fruitful exchange between knowledges produced about these concepts or practices; and, third, what the limits are of militarism and security. In the process, we address the shifts in the world that international relations and its related subfields study; shifts in the institutional framing and materiality of fields and subfields of research; and shifts in how international relations studies the world. Read together, the contributions to the special issue make the case for a reinvigorated focus on the mutual co-constitution of militarism and security.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-4 of 4

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view