| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias, et al.
(author)
-
Are there any Institutional Facts?
- 2019
-
In: Maurinian Truths : Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday - Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday. - 9789188899538 - 9789188899545 ; , s. 83-88
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 3. |
- Jönsson, Martin, et al.
(author)
-
Bradley, Compositionality and Davidson
- 2019
-
In: Maurinian Truths : Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday - Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday. - 9789188899538 - 9789188899545 ; , s. 55-64
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Persson, Johannes, et al.
(author)
-
Will science and proven experience converge or diverge? : The ontological considerations
- 2019
-
In: Maurinian Truths : Essays in honor of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th birthday - Essays in honor of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th birthday. - 9789188899538 - 9789188899545 ; , s. 97-106
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Proven experience can be shared. Given this, we cannot assume that the character of proven experience is always manifest as a physical token in each individual sharing it. But the token might still exist somewhere. Perhaps that is a condition of the proven experience’s existence. Something similar could have been accepted as true of scientific knowledge, especially if those who argued that scientific claims were only shorthand for more complicated claims about observations had been right. But it seems that they were not. Hence there might be an ontological difference explaining why there will always be a netto divergence between science and proven experience.
|
|
| 6. |
- Petersson, Björn, et al.
(author)
-
Too Many Omissions, Too Much Causation?
- 2019
-
In: Maurinian Truths : Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday - Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday. - 9789188899538 - 9789188899545 ; , s. 65-71
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 7. |
- Sahlin, Nils-Eric, et al.
(author)
-
The Ontology of Decision-Making
- 2019
-
In: Maurinian Truths : Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday - Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday. - 9789188899538 - 9789188899545 ; , s. 107-114
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Stenwall, Robin
(author)
-
A grounding physicalist solution to the causal exclusion problem
- 2021
-
In: Synthese. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0039-7857 .- 1573-0964. ; 198:12, s. 11775-11795
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Remember how Kim (Philos Perspect 3:77-108, 1989, in: Heil and Mele (eds) Mental causation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993b) used to argue against non-reductive physicalism to the effect that it cannot accommodate the causal efficacy of the mental? The argument was that if physicalists accept the causal closure of the physical, they are faced with an exclusion problem. In the original version of the argument, the dependence holding between the mental and the physical was cashed out in terms of supervenience. Due to the work or Fine (Philos Perspect 8:1-16, 1994) and others, we have since come to realize that modal notions are not well-suited to perform the work of properly characterizing dependence. As a consequence of this, an increasingly larger community of contemporary metaphysicians prefer to spell out mental-physical dependence in terms of a non-causal and non-reductive notion called grounding, which is intended to target a particular sort of metaphysical relation that takes us from ontologically less fundamental features of the world to that which is more fundamental. In this paper I join forces with those who think that this shift in focus is on the right track. More specifically, I will argue that the grounding physicalist can solve the exclusion problem in a way that is preferable to the supervenience-based nonreductive physicalist solution, as well as in a way that is compatible with the externalist picture of the mental.
|
|
| 10. |
- Stenwall, Robin, et al.
(author)
-
A new challenge for objective uncertainties and the propensity theorist
- 2018
-
In: Metaphysica. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 1874-6373 .- 1437-2053. ; 19:2, s. 219-224
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The paper is concerned with the existence of objective uncertainties. What would it take for objective uncertainties to exist, and what would be the consequences for our understanding of the world we live in? We approach these questions by considering two common theories on how we are to understand the being of propensities and how it pertains to possible outcomes that remain unmanifested. It is argued that both or these theories should be rejected, and be replaced with a theory we call unrestricted actualism according to which the possible outcomes of propensities (whether realized or unrealized) are denizens of the actual world.
|
|
