1. |
- Papageorgiou, Joanna-Maria, et al.
(author)
-
Fulminant myocarditis in a COVID-19 positive patient treated with mechanical circulatory support : - a case report
- 2021
-
In: European Heart Journal. Case Reports. - : Oxford University Press. - 2514-2119. ; 5:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreading from Wuhan, Hubei province in China, is an expanding global pandemic with significant morbidity and mortality. Even though respiratory failure is the cardinal form of severe COVID-19, concomitant cardiac involvement is common. Myocarditis is a challenging diagnosis due to heterogeneity of clinical presentation, ranging from mild symptoms to fatal arrhythmia and cardiogenic shock (CS). The aetiology is often viral and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for definite myocarditis. However, the diagnosis is often made on medical history, clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging, and blood tests. Case summary We present a 43-year-old man with mixed connective tissue disease treated with hydroxychloroquine who rapidly developed CS 4 days from symptom onset with fever and cough, showing positive polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA. While computed tomography of the thorax was normal, high-sensitivity troponin T was elevated and electrocardiogram showed diffuse ST elevation and low voltage as signs of myocardial oedema. Echocardiography showed severe depression of left ventricular function. The myocardium recovered completely after a week with mechanical circulatory support (MCS). EMB was performed but could neither identify the virus in the cardiomyocytes, nor signs of inflammation. Still the most probable aetiology of CS in this case is myocarditis as a sole symptom of COVID-19. Discussion COVID-19 patients in need of hospitalization present commonly with respiratory manifestations. We present the first case of fulminant myocarditis rapidly progressing to CS in a COVID-19 patient without respiratory failure, successfully treated with inotropes and MCS.
|
|
2. |
- Törnudd, Mattias, et al.
(author)
-
Fluid distribution kinetics during cardiopulmonary bypass
- 2014
-
In: Clinics. - : Faculdade de Medicina / USP. - 1807-5932 .- 1980-5322. ; 69:8, s. 535-541
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine the isovolumetric distribution kinetics of crystalloid fluid during cardiopulmonary bypass.METHODS:Ten patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting participated in this prospective observational study. The blood hemoglobin and the serum albumin and sodium concentrations were measured repeatedly during the distribution of priming solution (Ringer's acetate 1470 ml and mannitol 15% 200 ml) and initial cardioplegia. The rate of crystalloid fluid distribution was calculated based on 3-min Hb changes. The preoperative blood volume was extrapolated from the marked hemodilution occurring during the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01115166.RESULTS:The distribution half-time of Ringer's acetate averaged 8 minutes, corresponding to a transcapillary escape rate of 0.38 ml/kg/min. The intravascular albumin mass increased by 5.4% according to mass balance calculations. The preoperative blood volume, as extrapolated from the drop in hemoglobin concentration by 32% (mean) at the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass, was 0.6-1.2 L less than that estimated by anthropometric methods (p<0.02). The mass balance of sodium indicated a translocation from the intracellular to the extracellular fluid space in 8 of the 10 patients, with a median volume of 236 ml.CONCLUSIONS:The distribution half-time of Ringer's solution during isovolumetric cardiopulmonary bypass was 8 minutes, which is the same as for crystalloid fluid infusions in healthy subjects. The intravascular albumin mass increased. Most patients were hypovolemic prior to the start of anesthesia. Intracellular edema did not occur.
|
|
3. |
- Törnudd, Mattias, 1974-
(author)
-
Protamine, Platelet Function and Coagulation in Cardiac Surgery
- 2024
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Bleeding is a serious and common complication in cardiac surgery. Complicated surgery together with alterations in hemostatic conditions from the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), presents challenges in how to preserve hemostasis in the patient. CPB is thought to affect platelet function and coagulation in many ways. Before connecting the patient to the CPB system, heparin is used as anticoagulation. With the connection between the patient and the CPB tubing there is a dilution of platelets and coagulation proteins and despite anticoagulation there is an activation of coagulation and inflammation resulting in consumption of coagulation factors and triggering of fibrinolysis. After disconnection of the CPB system, protamine is used to reverse the effect of heparin and restore the coagulation capacity of the patient. When protamine binds to heparin, the anticoagulant effect of heparin is removed but protamine is known to affect both platelet function and coagulation. There is uncertainty about how to best dose protamine to limit the negative effects from protamine without risking remaining heparin effect. A lot is known about how and to what extent cardiac surgery with the use of CPB affect the hemostasis in the patient, but there are still many uncertainties. The aims of this thesis were to examine how platelets are affected by CPB and protamine and to investigate if dosing of protamine had an impact on the risk of remaining or reappearing heparin after cardiac surgery. We also wanted to investigate whether sampling site matters when studying platelet function. In paper I, we found that protamine in vitro interacts with platelets by both a direct activating effect and by a secondary impairment of function when exposed to other activators. The impairment of platelet function from protamine could also be seen in vivo and is described in paper III. In paper III, we also conclude that, in contrast to prior studies, there was no increase in activation in platelets, nor net loss of platelets, during moderate CPB times. After CPB we found no impairment of platelet function compared with before surgery. In paper II, we found no differences in platelet aggregability between venous and arterial blood when measured with impedance aggregometry. Also, with flow cytometry most of our parameters showed no differences between venous and arterial blood. However, there were some differences. For example, the level of monocyte-platelet-aggregates was higher in venous- compared with arterial blood, which raises questions whether platelet function changes with oxygenation and flow conditions. In paper IV, we found a dose dependent risk of remaining heparin activity in the first postoperative period. We also found reappearance of heparin activity that was independent of the protamine dose in almost all our patients. We did not find any correlation between remaining or reappearing heparin activity and bleeding. In conclusion, this thesis describes that moderate CPB times do not have the severe impairment on platelet function earlier described in the literature. The thesis also increases the knowledge regarding how protamine affects platelet function and how dosing of protamine does and does not affect the risk of remaining and reappearing heparin activity. Finally, we conclude that in most cases platelet function can be studied in venous and arterial blood interchangeably, but there might be some differences in platelet function depending on whether they are in the venous our arterial system.
|
|
4. |
- Törnudd, Mattias, et al.
(author)
-
Protamine stimulates platelet aggregation in vitro with activation of the fibrinogen receptor and alpha-granule release, but impairs secondary activation via ADP and thrombin receptors
- 2021
-
In: Platelets. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0953-7104 .- 1369-1635. ; 32:1, s. 90-96
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Heparin and protamine are fundamental in the management of anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. Excess protamine has been associated with increased bleeding. Interaction between protamine and platelet function has been demonstrated but the mechanism remains unclear. We examined the effect of protamine on platelet function in vitro using impedance aggregometry, flow cytometry, and thrombin generation. Platelets were exposed to protamine at final concentrations of 0, 20, 40, and 80 mu g/mL, alone or together with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or thrombin PAR1 receptor-activating peptide (TRAP). We found that in the absence of other activators, protamine (80 mu g/mL) increased the proportion of platelets with active fibrinogen receptor (binding of PAC-1) from 3.6% to 97.0% (p < .001) measured with flow cytometry. Impedance aggregometry also increased slightly after exposure to protamine alone. When activated with ADP or TRAP protamine at 80 mu g/mL reduced aggregation, from 73.8 +/- 29.4 U to 46.9 +/- 21.1 U (p < .001) with ADP and from 126.4 +/- 16.1 U to 94.9 +/- 23.7 U (p < .01) with TRAP. P-selectin exposure (a marker of alpha-granule release) measured by median fluorescence intensity (MFI) increased dose dependently with protamine alone, from 0.76 +/- 0.20 (0 mu g/mL) to 10.2 +/- 3.1 (80 mu g/mL), p < .001. Protamine 80 mu g/mL by itself resulted in higher MFI (10.16 +/- 3.09) than activation with ADP (2.2 +/- 0.7, p < .001) or TRAP (5.7 +/- 2.6, p < .01) without protamine. When protamine was combined with ADP or TRAP, there was a concentration-dependent increase in the alpha-granule release. In conclusion, protamine interacts with platelets in vitro having both a direct activating effect and impairment of secondary activation of aggregation by other agonists.
|
|
5. |
- Törnudd, Mattias, et al.
(author)
-
Quantification of platelet function : a comparative study of venous and arterial blood using a novel flow cytometry protocol
- 2022
-
In: Platelets. - Abingdon, United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis. - 0953-7104 .- 1369-1635. ; 33:6, s. 926-934
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Studies of platelet function in surgical patients often involve both arterial and venous sampling. Possible effects of different sampling sites could be important, but have not been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to compare platelet function in arterial and venous blood samples using a novel flow cytometry protocol and impedance aggregometry. Arterial and venous blood was collected before anesthesia in 10 patients undergoing cardiac surgery of which nine was treated with acetylsalicylic acid until the day before surgery. Flow cytometry included simultaneous analysis of phosphatidylserine exposure, active conformation of the fibrinogen receptor (PAC-1 binding), alpha-granule and lysosomal release (P-selectin and LAMP-1 exposure) and mitochondrial membrane integrity. Platelets were activated with ADP or peptides activating thrombin receptors (PAR1-AP/PAR4-AP) or collagen receptor GPVI (CRP-XL). Leukocyte-platelet conjugates and P-selectin exposure were evaluated immediately in fixated samples. For impedance aggregometry (Multiplate (R)), ADP, arachidonic acid, collagen and PAR1-AP (TRAP) were used as activators. Using impedance aggregometry and in 27 out of 37 parameters studied with flow cytometry there was no significant difference between venous and arterial blood sampling. Arterial blood showed more PAC-1 positive platelets when activated with PAR1-AP or PAR4-AP and venous blood showed more monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet conjugates and higher phosphatidylserine exposure with CRP-XL alone and combined with PAR1-AP or PAR4-AP. We found no differences using impedance aggregometry. In conclusion, testing of platelet function by flow cytometry and impedance aggregometry gave comparable results for most of the studied parameters in venous and arterial samples. Flow cytometry identified differences in PAC-1 binding when activated with PAR1-AP, exposure of phosphatidyl serine and monocyte/neutrophil-platelet conjugates, which might reflect differences in blood sampling technique or in flow conditions in this patient cohort with coronary artery disease. These differences might be considered when comparing data from different sample sites, but caution should be exercised if a different protocol is used or another patient group is studied.
|
|