| 1. |
- Kroger Dahlin, Britt-Inger, et al.
(author)
-
Patient's QoL after open kidney surgery in a randomized study of spinal versus epidural analgesia in patients with renal cell carcinoma
- 2019
-
In: Scandinavian journal of urology. - : Taylor & Francis. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 53, s. 17-17
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the patients perspectives, before and one month after surgery in patients treated with open surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Can effective perioperative analgesia be part of a multimodal approach to minimize morbidity and improve postoperative management [1].Material and Methods: A total of 135 patients with RCC in all stages 2012-2015, were randomized to receive either spinal analgesia with clonidine, or epidural analgesia in addition to the general anesthesia: The patients were stratified according to surgical technique. Inclusion criteria: ASA score I-III, age >18 years, no chronic pain medication or cognitive disorders. The patients survey used was based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used for statistical evaluation.Results: A majority of the patients (117 of 135, 86%) responded to the survey. Patients groups treated with partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy, had significantly reduced physical and social functioning while emotional functioning improved postoperatively compared with preoperatively. In both surgical groups the patients reported significant negative financial difficulties postoperatively. Similar results was achieved for patients treated with either spinal or epidural anesthesia. The epidural group of patients experienced more negative social functioning but had an improved global health. When comparing the surgical procedures there was no significant difference in the quality of life parameters. However when comparing the analgesic groups, spinal anesthesia had significantly better physical and social functioning after surgery while the patients in the epidural group reported better global health.Conclusion: Patients randomized to be treated with spinal analgesia with clonidine, had better physical and social functioning postoperatively than patients randomized to be treated with epidural analgesia.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Thurm, Mascha, et al.
(author)
-
Spinal anaesthesia with clonidine: pain relief and earlier mobilisation after open nephrectomy – a randomised clinical trial
- 2022
-
In: Journal of international medical research. - : Sage Publications. - 0300-0605 .- 1473-2300. ; 50:9, s. 1-12
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives: Early mobilisation and effective pain management after open nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma often include epidural analgesia (EDA), requiring an infusion pump and a urinary catheter, thus impeding mobilisation. Spinal anaesthesia (SpA) may be an alternative. This randomised clinical trial evaluated whether SpA improves analgesia and facilitates mobilisation over EDA and which factors influence mobilisation and length of stay (LOS).Methods: Between 2012 and 2015, 135 patients were randomised and stratified by surgical method to either SpA with clonidine or EDA. Mobility index score (MobIs), pain scale, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and LOS were the main outcome measures.Results: SpA patients exhibited an increase in MobIs significantly earlier than EDA patients. Among SpA patients >50% reached MobIs ≥13 by postoperative day 3, while 29% of EDA patients never reached MobIs ≥13 before discharge. SpA patients had higher maximum pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 2, but both groups had similar patient satisfaction. One day before discharge, 36/64 SpA versus 22/67 EDA patients (56% and 33%, respectively) were opioid-free. SpA patients were discharged significantly earlier than EDA patients.Conclusions: SpA facilitates postoperative pain management and is associated with faster mobilisation and shorter LOS.The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.org (ID-NCT02030717).
|
|
| 4. |
- Thurm, Mascha, et al.
(author)
-
Spinal analgesia improves surgical outcome after open nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma : a randomized controlled study
- 2017
-
In: Scandinavian journal of urology. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 51:4, s. 277-281
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: This study evaluated whether more effective perioperative analgesia can be part of a multimodal approach to minimizing morbidity and improving postoperative management after the open surgical approaches frequently used in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of the study was to determine whether spinal anesthesia with clonidine can enhance postoperative analgesia, speed up mobilization and reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS).Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2015, 135 patients with RCC were randomized, in addition to general anesthesia, to receive either spinal analgesia with clonidine or epidural analgesia, stratified to surgical technique. Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III or less, age over 18 years and no chronic pain medication or cognitive disorders.Results: The median LOS was 4 days for patients in the spinal group and 6 days in the epidural group (p = 0.001). There were no differences regarding duration of surgery, blood loss, RENAL score, tumor size or complications between the given analgesia methods. A limitation was that different anesthesiologists were responsible for administering spinal or epidural anesthesia, as in a real-world clinical situation.Conclusions: In this randomized controlled study, spinal analgesia with clonidine was superior to continuous epidural analgesia in patients operated on with open nephrectomy, based on shorter LOS. A shorter LOS in the study group indicates faster mobilization and improved analgesia. Spinal analgesia did not carry more complications than epidural analgesia.
|
|
