SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Wyckoff Lynae) "

Search: WFRF:(Wyckoff Lynae)

  • Result 1-3 of 3
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Scribani, Melissa, et al. (author)
  • Comparison of bias resulting from two methods of self-reporting height and weight : a validation study
  • 2014
  • In: JRSM Open. - : Sage Publications. - 2054-2704. ; 5:6
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVES: To contrast the validity of two modes of self-reported height and weight data.DESIGN: Subjects' self-reported height and weight by mailed survey without expectation of subsequent measurement. Subjects were later offered a physical exam, where they self-reported their height and weight again, just prior to measurement. Regression equations to predict actual from self-reported body mass index (BMI) were fitted for both sets of self-reported values. Residual analyses assessed bias resulting from application of each regression equation to the alternative mode of self-report. Analyses were stratified by gender.SETTING: Upstate New York.PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (n = 260) with survey, pre-exam and measured BMI.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of obesity based on two modes of self-report and also measured values. Bias resulting from misapplication of correction equations.RESULTS: Accurate prediction of measured BMI was possible for both self-report modes for men (R (2 )= 0.89 survey, 0.85 pre-exam) and women (R (2 )= 0.92 survey, 0.97 pre-exam). Underreporting of BMI was greater for survey than pre-exam but only significantly so in women. Obesity prevalence was significantly underestimated by 10.9% (p < 0.001) and 14.9% (p < 0.001) for men and 5.4% (p = 0.007) and 11.2% (p < 0.001) for women, for pre-exam and survey, respectively. Residual analyses showed that significant bias results when a regression model derived from one mode of self-report is used to correct BMI values estimated from the alternative mode.CONCLUSIONS: Both modes significantly underestimated obesity prevalence. Underestimation of actual BMI is greater for survey than pre-exam self-report for both genders, indicating that equations adjusting for self-report bias must be matched to the self-report mode.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-3 of 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view