| 1. |
- Cui, Hao, et al.
(author)
-
Multi-strategy boosted Aquila optimizer for function optimization and engineering design problems
- 2024
-
In: Cluster Computing. - : SPRINGER. - 1386-7857 .- 1573-7543.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- As the complexity of optimization problems continues to rise, the demand for high-performance algorithms becomes increasingly urgent. This paper addresses the challenges faced by the Aquila Optimizer (AO), a novel swarm-based intelligent optimizer simulating the predatory behaviors of Aquila in North America. While AO has shown good performance in prior studies, it grapples with issues such as poor convergence accuracy and a tendency to fall into local optima when tackling complex optimization tasks. To overcome these challenges, this paper proposes a multi-strategy boosted AO algorithm (PGAO) aimed at providing enhanced reliability for global optimization. The proposed algorithm incorporates several key strategies. Initially, a chaotic map is employed to initialize the positions of all search agents, enriching population diversity and laying a solid foundation for global exploration. Subsequently, the pinhole imaging learning strategy is introduced to identify superior candidate solutions in the opposite direction of the search domain during each iteration, accelerating convergence and increasing the probability of obtaining the global optimal solution. To achieve a more effective balance between the exploration and development phases in AO, a nonlinear switching factor is designed to replace the original fixed switching mechanism. Finally, the golden sine operator is utilized to enhance the algorithm's local exploitation trends. Through these four improvement strategies, the optimization performance of AO is significantly enhanced. The proposed PGAO algorithm's effectiveness is validated across 23 classical, 29 IEEE CEC2017, and 10 IEEE CEC2019 benchmark functions. Additionally, six real-world engineering design problems are employed to assess the practicability of PGAO. Results demonstrate that PGAO exhibits better competitiveness and application prospects compared to the basic method and various advanced algorithms. In conclusion, this study contributes to addressing the challenges of complex optimization problems, significantly improving the performance of global optimization algorithms, and holds both theoretical and practical significance.
|
|
| 2. |
- Xiao, Yaning, et al.
(author)
-
MSAO: A multi-strategy boosted snow ablation optimizer for global optimization and real-world engineering applications
- 2024
-
In: Advanced Engineering Informatics. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 1474-0346 .- 1873-5320. ; 61
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Snow Ablation Optimizer (SAO) is a cutting-edge nature-inspired meta-heuristic technique that mimics the sublimation and melting processes of snow in its quest for optimal solution to complex problems. While SAO has demonstrated competitive performance in comparison to classical algorithms in early research, it still exhibits certain limitations including low convergence accuracy, a lack of population diversity, and premature convergence, particularly when addressing high-dimensional intricate challenges. To mitigate the above-mentioned adverse factors, this paper introduces a novel variant of SAO with featuring four enhancement strategies collectively referred as MSAO. Firstly, the good point set initialization strategy is employed to generate a uniformly distributed high-quality population, which facilitates the algorithm to enter the appropriate search domain rapidly. Secondly, the greedy selection method is adopted to reserve better candidate solutions for the next iteration, thus striking a robust exploration-exploitation balance. Then, the Differential Evolution (DE) scheme is introduced to expand the search range and enhance the exploitation capability of the algorithm for higher convergence accuracy. Finally, to reduce the risk of falling into local optima, a Dynamic Lens OppositionBased Learning (DLOBL) strategy is developed to operate on the current optimal solution dimension by dimension. With the blessing of these strategies, the optimization performance of MSAO is comprehensively improved. To comprehensively evaluate the optimization performance of MSAO, a series of numerical optimization experiments are conducted using the IEEE CEC2017 & CEC2022 test sets. In the IEEE CEC2017 experiments, the optimal crossover probability CR = 0.8 is determined and the effectiveness of each improvement strategy is ablatively verified. MSAO is compared with the basic SAO, various state-of-the-art optimizers, and CEC2017 champion algorithms in terms of solution accuracy, convergence speed, robustness, and scalability. In the IEEE CEC2022 experiments, MSAO is compared with some recently developed improved algorithms to further validate its superiority. The results demonstrate that MSAO has excellent overall optimization performance, with the smallest Friedman mean rankings of 1.66 and 1.25 on both test suites, respectively. In the majority of test cases, MSAO can provide more accurate and reliable solutions than other competitors. Furthermore, six realistic constrained engineering design challenges and one photovoltaic model parameter estimation issue are employed to demonstrate the practicality of MSAO. Our findings suggest that MSAO has excellent optimization capacity and broad application potential.
|
|
