| 1. |
- Bentes, C., et al.
(author)
-
Reperfusion therapies and poststroke seizures
- 2020
-
In: Epilepsy and Behavior. - : Elsevier BV. - 1525-5050. ; 104
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Seizures are not only a frequent complication of stroke but have been associated with an unfavorable functional and vital outcome of patients who have had stroke. Facing a new paradigm of acute standard stroke care, acute symptomatic seizures in this clinical setting deserve to be rethought. Reperfusion therapies, the gold standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke, improve long-term survival and outcome of patients who have had stroke and have been associated both with clinical seizures and the occurrence of epileptiform activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG). This narrative review describes the different physiopathological mechanisms underlying the possible association between reperfusion therapies and seizures, both acute symptomatic seizures and unprovoked seizures, and the current evidence regarding the risk of poststroke seizures in treated patients. It also identifies the gaps in our knowledge to foster future studies in this field. By different mechanisms, reperfusions therapies may have opposing effects on the risk of poststroke seizures. There is a need for a better definition of the specific physiopathology of seizures in clinical practice, as many factors can be recognized. Additionally, most of the current clinical evidence refers to acute symptomatic seizures and not to unprovoked seizures or poststroke epilepsy, and our analysis does not support the existence of a strong association between thrombolysis and poststroke seizures. So far, the impact of reperfusion therapies on the frequency of poststroke seizures is unclear. To study this effect, many clinical challenges must be overcome, including a better and clear operational definition of seizures and stroke characteristics, the standard of stroke and epilepsy care and EEG monitoring, and the degree of reperfusion success. Prospective, high quality, larger, and longer follow-up multicentric studies are urgently needed. Additionally, stroke registries can also prove useful in better elucidate whether there is an association between reperfusion therapies and seizures. Seizures & Stroke. © 2019 Elsevier Inc.
|
|
| 2. |
- Eriksson, K., et al.
(author)
-
Stroke
- 2023
-
In: Teamarbete i neurologisk vård. - Lund : Studentlitteratur AB. - 9789144158174 ; , s. 73-114
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 3. |
- Koepp, M. J., et al.
(author)
-
Antiepileptogenesis after stroke-trials and tribulations: Methodological challenges and recruitment results of a Phase II study with eslicarbazepine acetate
- 2023
-
In: Epilepsia Open. - : Wiley. - 2470-9239. ; 8:3, s. 1190-1201
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- There is currently no evidence to support the use of antiseizure medications to prevent unprovoked seizures following stroke. Experimental animal models suggested a potential antiepileptogenic effect for eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), and a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test this hypothesis and assess whether ESL treatment for 1 month can prevent unprovoked seizures following stroke. We outline the design and status of this antiepileptogenesis study, and discuss the challenges encountered in its execution to date. Patients at high risk of developing unprovoked seizures after acute intracerebral hemorrhage or acute ischemic stroke were randomized to receive ESL 800 mg/d or placebo, initiated within 120 hours after primary stroke occurrence. Treatment continued until Day 30, then tapered off. Patients could receive all necessary therapies for stroke treatment according to clinical practice guidelines and standard of care, and are being followed up for 18 months. The primary efficacy endpoint is the occurrence of a first unprovoked seizure within 6 months after randomization ("failure rate"). Secondary efficacy assessments include the occurrence of a first unprovoked seizure during 12 months after randomization and during the entire study; functional outcomes (Barthel Index original 10-item version; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale); post-stroke depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9); and overall survival. Safety assessments include the evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events; laboratory parameters; vital signs; electrocardiogram; suicidal ideation and behavior (PHQ-9 question 9). The protocol aimed to randomize approximately 200 patients (1:1), recruited from 21 sites in seven European countries and Israel. Despite the challenges encountered, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study progressed and included a remarkable number of patients, with 129 screened and 125 randomized. Recruitment was stopped after 30 months, the first patient entered in May 2019, and the study is ongoing and following up on patients according to the Clinical Trial Protocol.
|
|
| 4. |
- Larsson, David, 1986, et al.
(author)
-
Association Between Antiseizure Drug Monotherapy and Mortality for Patients With Poststroke Epilepsy
- 2022
-
In: JAMA Neurology. - : American Medical Association (AMA). - 2168-6149 .- 2168-6157. ; 79:2, s. 169-175
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- IMPORTANCE There is little evidence to guide the choice of antiseizure medication (ASM) for patients with poststroke epilepsy. Theoretical concerns about detrimental effects of ASMs on survival exist. Enzyme-inducing drugs could interfere with secondary stroke prevention. The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued a safety announcement about the potential proarrhythmic properties of lamotrigine. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether mortality varies with specific ASMs among patients with poststroke epilepsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cohort study was conducted using individual-level data from linked registers on all adults in Sweden with acute stroke from July 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010, and subsequent onset of epilepsy before December 31, 2014. A total of 2577 patients receiving continuous ASM monotherapy were eligible for the study. Data were analyzed between May 27, 2019, and April 8, 2021. EXPOSURES The dispensed ASM (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code N03A) determined exposure status, and the first dispensation date marked the start of treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome, all-cause death, was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression with carbamazepine as the reference. Cardiovascular death (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes I0-I99 as the underlying cause) was assessed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression models. RESULTS A total of 2577 patients (1400 men [54%]; median age, 78 years [IQR, 69-85 years]) were included. The adjusted hazard ratio of all-cause death compared with carbamazepine was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.86) for lamotrigine, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.23-1.59) for valproic acid, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.88-1.51) for phenytoin, and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.81-1.66) for oxcarbazepine. The adjusted hazard ratio of cardiovascular death compared with carbamazepine was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.95) for lamotrigine, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.19-1.64) for valproic acid, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.71-1.47) for phenytoin, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.42-1.18) for oxcarbazepine. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study's findings suggest differences in survival between patients treated with different ASMs for poststroke epilepsy. Patients receiving lamotrigine monotherapy had significantly lower mortality compared with those receiving carbamazepine. The opposite applied to patients prescribed valproic acid, who had a higher risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death. Levetiracetam was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared with carbamazepine, but there was no significant difference in overall mortality.
|
|
| 5. |
- Mishra, Nishant K, et al.
(author)
-
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with post-stroke epilepsy: protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis from the International Post-stroke Epilepsy Research Repository (IPSERR).
- 2023
-
In: BMJ open. - 2044-6055. ; 13:11
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Despite significant advances in managing acute stroke and reducing stroke mortality, preventing complications like post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) has seen limited progress. PSE research has been scattered worldwide with varying methodologies and data reporting. To address this, we established the International Post-stroke Epilepsy Research Consortium (IPSERC) to integrate global PSE research efforts. This protocol outlines an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) to determine outcomes in patients with post-stroke seizures (PSS) and develop/validate PSE prediction models, comparing them with existing models. This protocol informs about creating the International Post-stroke Epilepsy Research Repository (IPSERR) to support future collaborative research.We utilised a comprehensive search strategy and searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases until 30 January 2023. We extracted observational studies of stroke patients aged ≥18 years, presenting early or late PSS with data on patient outcome measures, and conducted the risk of bias assessment. We did not apply any restriction based on the date or language of publication. We will invite these study authors and the IPSERC collaborators to contribute IPD to IPSERR. We will review the IPD lodged within IPSERR to identify patients who developed epileptic seizures and those who did not. We will merge the IPD files of individual data and standardise the variables where possible for consistency. We will conduct an IPD-MA to estimate the prognostic value of clinical characteristics in predicting PSE.Ethics approval is not required for this study. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. This study will contribute to IPSERR, which will be available to researchers for future PSE research projects. It will also serve as a platform to anchor future clinical trials.NCT06108102.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Zelano, Johan, 1981, et al.
(author)
-
Ambulansuppdrag för epilepsianfall är vanligare i låginkomstområden : Ambulance assignments for epilepsy seizures were more common in socioeconomically weaker areas
- 2022
-
In: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 119:15-16
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Internationally, the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy increases with lower socioeconomic position. We analyzed GPS coordinates of ambulance assignments for seizures in Västra Götalandsregionen, a health care region in western Sweden with 1.7 million inhabitants, and correlated the number of assignments to socioeconomic data. As expected, epilepsy was more common in areas of lower socioeconomic level, but this correlation was weak. Ambulance assignments for seizures were more common in socioeconomically weaker areas, even when the higher prevalence of epilepsy was taken into account. Possible, not mutually exclusive, explanations include more severe epilepsy, lower ambitions in the epilepsy care provided, and/or differences in health care utilization behavior. The study illustrates the relevance of the 2019 national guidelines for improved equal access to epilepsy care. Data on socioeconomic parameters and prehospital care can be valuable for improvement of epilepsy care.
|
|
