| 1. |
- de Graan, Anne-Joy M., et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of Smoking on the Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity Profiles of Taxane Therapy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Clinical Cancer Research. - 1078-0432 .- 1557-3265. ; 18:16, s. 4425-4432
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Cigarette smoke is known to interact with the metabolism of several anticancer drugs. It may also affect the incidence and severity of adverse events and efficacy of chemotherapy. The main objective of this study was to examine the effects of smoking on the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of patients treated with docetaxel or paclitaxel.Experimental Design: Smoking status, toxicity profiles, and pharmacokinetic parameters (calculated by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling population analysis) were determined in 566 patients (429 nonsmokers and 137 smokers) treated with docetaxel or paclitaxel.Results: Smokers treated with docetaxel showed less grade IV neutropenia (35% vs. 52%; P = 0.01) than nonsmokers. Smokers treated with paclitaxel had less grade III-IV leukopenia than nonsmokers (12% vs. 25%; P = 0.03), and the white blood cell (WBC) nadir was lower in nonsmokers (median, 2.7 x 10(9)/L; range, 0.05 x 10(9) to 11.6 x 10(9)/L) than in smokers (median, 3.3 x 10(9)/L; range 0.8 x 10(9) to 10.2 x 10(9)/L; P = 0.02). Of interest, significantly lower WBC counts and absolute neutrophil counts at baseline were seen in nonsmoking patients treated with paclitaxel (P = 0.0001). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in smokers and nonsmokers for both taxanes.Conclusion: Cigarette smoking does not alter the pharmacokinetic determinants of docetaxel and paclitaxel. Smokers treated with docetaxel and paclitaxel have less neutropenia and leukopenia, but further research is warranted to elucidate this potential protective effect.
|
|
| 2. |
- van Doorn, Leni, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of Scalp Cooling on the Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Cancers. - : MDPI. - 2072-6694. ; 13:15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Simple Summary This study investigated the correlation between scalp cooling used to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia and the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in female cancer patients with a solid tumor. In a prospective cohort study, 14 patients who were treated with weekly paclitaxel and scalp cooling were able to undergo pharmacokinetic sampling of paclitaxel during one cycle of treatment. In comparison to a control cohort of 24 patients treated with weekly paclitaxel without scalp cooling, our data showed that scalp cooling used concomitantly with one course of paclitaxel did not reduce or increase the clearance of paclitaxel. Therefore, it is unlikely that scalp cooling influences paclitaxel efficacy or toxicity. Finally, despite scalp cooling, half of the patients in our study developed a form of hair loss. Importantly, neither an association with difference in paclitaxel clearance nor change in hair loss was found. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), a side effect with high impact, can be prevented by cooling the scalp during the administration of some cytotoxic drugs. However, the effects of this prolonged scalp cooling on the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy have never been investigated. In this study, we compared the pharmacokinetics of the widely used chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel (weekly dose of 80-100 mg/m(2)) in female patients with solid tumors using concomitant scalp cooling (n = 14) or not (n = 24). Blood samples were collected in all patients for pharmacokinetic analyses up to 6 h after one course of paclitaxel administration. The primary endpoint was the clearance (L/h) of paclitaxel. Paclitaxel clearance-expressed as relative difference in geometric means-was 6.8% (90% CI: -16.7% to 4.4%) lower when paclitaxel was administered with concomitant scalp cooling versus paclitaxel infusions without scalp cooling. Within the subgroup of patients using scalp cooling, paclitaxel clearance was not statistically significantly different between patients with CIA (alopecia grade 1 or 2) and those without CIA. Hence, scalp cooling did not negatively influence the clearance of paclitaxel treatment.
|
|
| 3. |
- van Eerden, Ruben A. G., et al.
(författare)
-
Tissue Type Differences in ABCB1 Expression and Paclitaxel Tissue Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Pharmacology. - : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 1663-9812. ; 12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Data from previous work suggests that there is no correlation between systemic (plasma) paclitaxel exposure and efficacy in patients treated for esophageal cancer. In this trial, we investigated ATP-binding cassette efflux transporter expression and intratumoral pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel to identify changes which could be a first sign of chemoresistance.Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin (+/- concomitant radiotherapy) were included. During the first and last cycle of weekly paclitaxel, blood samples and biopsies of esophageal mucosa and tumor tissue were taken. Changes in paclitaxel exposure and expression of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) over time were studied in both tumor tissue and normal appearing esophageal mucosa.Results: ABCB1 was significantly higher expressed in tumor tissue compared to esophageal tissue, during both the first and last cycle of paclitaxel (cycle 1: p < 0.01; cycle 5/6: p = 0.01). Interestingly, ABCB1 expression was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma than in squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.01). During the first cycle, a trend towards a higher intratumoral paclitaxel concentration was observed compared to the esophageal mucosa concentration (RD:43%; 95%CI: -3% to 111% p = 0.07). Intratumoral and plasma paclitaxel concentrations were significantly correlated during the first cycle (AUC(0-48 h): r = 0.72; p < 0.01).Conclusion: Higher ABCB1 expression in tumor tissue, and differences between histological tumor types might partly explain why tumors respond differently to systemic treatment. Resistance by altered intratumoral paclitaxel concentrations could not be demonstrated because the majority of the biopsies taken at the last cycle of paclitaxel did contain a low amount of tumor cells or no tumor.
|
|
