| 1. |
- van de Velde, Cornelis J. H., et al.
(author)
-
EURECCA colorectal : Multidisciplinary Mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe
- 2013
-
In: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier BV. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 49:13, s. 2784-2790
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last twenty years however still considerable variation exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of cancer care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012 the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about colon and rectum was held looking for multidisciplinary consensus. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.Methods: The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Experts commented and voted on the two web-based online voting rounds before the meeting (between 4th and 25th October and between the 20th November and 3rd December 2012) as well as one online round after the meeting (4th-20th March 2013) and were invited to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th-15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. All sentences that were voted on are available on the EURECCA website www.canceraudit.eu. The consensus document was divided in sections describing evidence based algorithms of diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and stage IV separately. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method.Results: The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members.Conclusions: It is feasible to achieve European Consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues using the Delphi method. This consensus embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.
|
|
| 2. |
- van de Velde, Cornelis J H, et al.
(author)
-
EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum.
- 2014
-
In: European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-0852 .- 0959-8049. ; 50:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last 20years; however considerable variation still exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Large variation is also apparent between national guidelines and patterns of cancer care in Europe. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of Cancer Care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012, the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about cancer of the colon and rectum was held. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.
|
|
| 3. |
- Smit, Marloes A., et al.
(author)
-
Deep learning based tumor–stroma ratio scoring in colon cancer correlates with microscopic assessment
- 2023
-
In: Journal of Pathology Informatics. - : Elsevier B.V.. - 2229-5089 .- 2153-3539. ; 14
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The amount of stroma within the primary tumor is a prognostic parameter for colon cancer patients. This phenomenon can be assessed using the tumor–stroma ratio (TSR), which classifies tumors in stroma-low (≤50% stroma) and stroma-high (>50% stroma). Although the reproducibility for TSR determination is good, improvement might be expected from automation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the scoring of the TSR in a semi- and fully automated method using deep learning algorithms is feasible. Methods: A series of 75 colon cancer slides were selected from a trial series of the UNITED study. For the standard determination of the TSR, 3 observers scored the histological slides. Next, the slides were digitized, color normalized, and the stroma percentages were scored using semi- and fully automated deep learning algorithms. Correlations were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman rank correlations. Results: 37 (49%) cases were classified as stroma-low and 38 (51%) as stroma-high by visual estimation. A high level of concordance between the 3 observers was reached, with ICCs of 0.91, 0.89, and 0.94 (all P < .001). Between visual and semi-automated assessment the ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.23–0.91, P-value 0.005), with a Spearman correlation of 0.88 (P < .001). Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.70 (N=3) were observed for visual estimation versus the fully automated scoring procedures. Conclusion: Good correlations were observed between standard visual TSR determination and semi- and fully automated TSR scores. At this point, visual examination has the highest observer agreement, but semi-automated scoring could be helpful to support pathologists. © 2023 The Authors
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Dijkstra, Jeroen R., et al.
(author)
-
Implementation of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Cell Line Pellets as High-Quality Process Controls in Quality Assessment Programs for KRAS Mutation Analysis
- 2012
-
In: The Journal Of Molecular Diagnostics. - : Elsevier BV. - 1525-1578. ; 14:3, s. 187-191
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In recent years, the mutational status of the KRAS oncogene has become incorporated into standard medical care as a predictive marker for therapeutic decisions related to patients with metastasized colorectal cancer. This is necessary, because these patients benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy with increased progression-free survival only if the tumor does not carry a mutation in KRAS. Many different analytical platforms, both those commercially available and those developed in house, have been used within pathology laboratories to assess KRAS mutational status. For a testing laboratory to become accredited to perform such tests, it is essential that they perform reliability testing, but it has not previously been possible to perform this kind of testing on the complete workflow on a large scale without compromising reproducibility or the mimicry of the control sample. We assessed a novel synthetic control for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples in a blind study conducted within nine laboratories across Europe. We show that FFPE material can, at least in part, mimic clinical samples and we demonstrate this control to be a valuable tool in the assessment of platforms used In testing for KRAS mutational status. (J Mal Diagn 2012; 14:187-191; DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.01.002).
|
|
