SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Follath F.) "

Search: WFRF:(Follath F.)

  • Result 1-17 of 17
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Cleland, J. G., et al. (author)
  • The EuroHeart Failure survey programme-- a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis
  • 2003
  • In: European heart journal. - 0195-668X. ; 24:5, s. 442-63
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has published guidelines for the investigation of patients with suspected heart failure and, if the diagnosis is proven, their subsequent management. Hospitalisation provides a key point of care at which time diagnosis and treatment may be refined to improve outcome for a group of patients with a high morbidity and mortality. However, little international data exists to describe the features and management of such patients. Accordingly, the EuroHeart Failure survey was conducted to ascertain if appropriate tests were being performed with which to confirm or refute a diagnosis of heart failure and how this influenced subsequent management. METHODS: The survey screened consecutive deaths and discharges during 2000-2001 predominantly from medical wards over a 6-week period in 115 hospitals from 24 countries belonging to the ESC, to identify patients with known or suspected heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 46788 deaths and discharges were screened from which 11327 (24%) patients were enrolled with suspected or confirmed heart failure. Forty-seven percent of those enrolled were women. Fifty-one percent of women and 30% of men were aged >75 years. Eighty-three percent of patients had a diagnosis of heart failure made on or prior to the index admission. Heart failure was the principal reason for admission in 40%. The great majority of patients (>90%) had had an ECG, chest X-ray, haemoglobin and electrolytes measured as recommended in ESC guidelines, but only 66% had ever had an echocardiogram. Left ventricular ejection fraction had been measured in 57% of men and 41% of women, usually by echocardiography (84%) and was <40% in 51% of men but only in 28% of women. Forty-five percent of women and 22% of men were reported to have normal left ventricular systolic function by qualitative echocardiographic assessment. A substantial proportion of patients had alternative explanations for heart failure other than left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction, including valve disease. Within 12 weeks of discharge, 24% of patients had been readmitted. A total of 1408 of 10434 (13.5%) patients died between admission and 12 weeks follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Known or suspected heart failure comprises a large proportion of admissions to medical wards and such patients are at high risk of early readmission and death. Many of the basic investigations recommended by the ESC were usually carried out, although it is not clear whether this was by design or part of a general routine for all patients being admitted regardless of diagnosis. The investigation most specific for patients with suspected heart failure (echocardiography) was performed less frequently, suggesting that the diagnosis of heart failure is still relatively neglected. Most men but a minority of women who underwent investigation of cardiac function had evidence of moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction, the main target of current advances in the treatment of heart failure. Considerable diagnostic uncertainty remains for many patients with suspected heart failure, even after echocardiography, which must be resolved in order to target existing and new therapies and services effectively.
  •  
4.
  • Cowie, MR, et al. (author)
  • Clinical applications of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing
  • 2003
  • In: European Heart Journal. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 24:19, s. 1710-1718
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Many claims have been made in recent years regarding the utility of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration measurements in the diagnosis, risk stratification and monitoring of patients with heart failure. This paper summarizes the current evidence and provides guidance for practising clinicians. Overall, plasma BNP testing appears to be of most value in the diagnostic arena, where it is likely to improve the performance of non-specialist physicians in diagnosing heart failure. In clinical practice, BNP testing is best used as a 'rule out' test for suspected cases of new heart failure in breathless patients presenting to either the outpatient or emergency care settings, it is not a replacement for echocardiography and full cardiological assessment, which will be required for patients with an elevated BNP concentration. Although work is ongoing in establishing the 'normal' values of BNP, heart failure appears to be highly unlikely below a plasma concentration of 100 pg/ml. However, as BNP levels rise with age and are affected by gender, comorbidity and drug therapy, the plasma BNP measurement should not be used in isolation from the clinical context.
  •  
5.
  • Khan, N. K., et al. (author)
  • Prevalence of ECG abnormalities in an international survey of patients with suspected or confirmed heart failure at death or discharge
  • 2007
  • In: European journal of heart failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842. ; 9:5, s. 491-501
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: Most patients suspected of having heart failure (HF) will get a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) but its utility for excluding HF or assisting in its management has rarely been investigated. METHODS: The EuroHeart Failure survey identified 11,327 patients hospitalised with a suspected diagnosis of HF from 115 hospitals in 24 countries. ECGs were obtained from 9315 patients, of whom 5934 had cardiac imaging tests. The utility of the ECG was assessed for excluding or diagnosing major structural heart disease (MSHD) or major left ventricular systolic dysfunction (MLVSD) and for therapeutic decision making. FINDINGS: MSHD was present in 70% and MLVSD in 54% of patients overall but in only 21% and 5%, respectively, if the ECG was entirely normal. However, <2% of patients had a normal ECG. No single ECG characteristic identified a probability <25% of MSHD or <20% of MLVSD. Patients with QRS width >/=120 ms or anterior pathological Q-waves had a probability >80% of MSHD and >70% of MLVSD. Diagnostic models suggested that electrocardiographic criteria alone were not accurate for the diagnosis or exclusion of important heart disease in this population. However, 2468 patients (42%) had an electrocardiographic finding that should be used to guide the choice of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A normal ECG is rare in patients with suspected HF but has limited diagnostic value in this setting. The ECG has an important role in guiding therapy.
  •  
6.
  • Komajda, M., et al. (author)
  • Management of octogenarians hospitalized for heart failure in Euro Heart Failure Survey I
  • 2007
  • In: Eur Heart J. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X. ; 28:11, s. 1310-8
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • AIMS: Here, the aim is to study the management of octogenarians hospitalized for heart failure in Euro Heart Failure Survey I. Heart Failure (HF) is common in older people and associated with poor outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared clinical characteristics, treatment, and short-term outcomes in 2780 octogenarians (group A, median age 85 years) and in 7912 younger patients (group B, median age 69 years) enrolled in the Euro Heart Failure Survey I. There were 37% males in group A vs. 59% in group B (P < 0.001). Co-morbidities were more common in group A. Ejection fraction was measured only in 38% in group A vs. 65% in group B (P < 0.001) and when measured was preserved in 50 vs. 40% (P < 0.001). In-hospital and 12 weeks follow-up mortality were, respectively, 13 vs. 5% (P < 0.001) and 12 vs. 6% (P < 0.001) in groups A and B. Acute cardiac conditions and co-morbidity predicted mortality, whereas the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and beta-blockers was associated with a better outcome. ACE-I and beta-blockers were used in 50 vs. 66% (P < 0.001) and 24 vs. 42% (P < 0.001) in groups A and B, respectively, whereas diuretics, digitalis, and nitrates were more commonly used in octogenarians. CONCLUSION: Preserved systolic function, multiple co-morbidities, and high mortality are observed in octogenarians with HF. In these patients, cardiac function is assessed in only a minority and treatments known to improve prognosis in younger patients under-utilized. Overall, the management of octogenarians with HF does not follow international guidelines.
  •  
7.
  • Komajda, M., et al. (author)
  • The EuroHeart Failure Survey programme--a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 2: treatment
  • 2003
  • In: European heart journal. - 0195-668X. ; 24:5, s. 464-74
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: National surveys suggest that treatment of heart failure in daily practice differs from guidelines and is characterized by underuse of recommended medications. Accordingly, the Euro Heart Failure Survey was conducted to ascertain how patients hospitalized for heart failure are managed in Europe and if national variations occur in the treatment of this condition. METHODS: The survey screened discharge summaries of 11304 patients over a 6-week period in 115 hospitals from 24 countries belonging to the ESC to study their medical treatment. RESULTS: Diuretics (mainly loop diuretics) were prescribed in 86.9% followed by ACE inhibitors (61.8%), beta-blockers (36.9%), cardiac glycosides (35.7%), nitrates (32.1%), calcium channel blockers (21.2%) and spironolactone (20.5%). 44.6% of the population used four or more different drugs. Only 17.2% were under the combination of diuretic, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Important local variations were found in the rate of prescription of ACE inhibitors and particularly beta-blockers. Daily dosage of ACE inhibitors and particularly of beta-blockers was on average below the recommended target dose. Modelling-analysis of the prescription of treatments indicated that the aetiology of heart failure, age, co-morbid factors and type of hospital ward influenced the rate of prescription. Age <70 years, male gender and ischaemic aetiology were associated with an increased odds ratio for receiving an ACE inhibitor. Prescription of ACE inhibitors was also greater in diabetic patients and in patients with low ejection fraction (<40%) and lower in patients with renal dysfunction. The odds ratio for receiving a beta-blocker was reduced in patients >70 years, in patients with respiratory disease and increased in cardiology wards, in ischaemic heart failure and in male subjects. Prescription of cardiac glycosides was significantly increased in patients with supraventricular tachycardia/atrial fibrillation. Finally, the rate of prescription of antithrombotic agents was increased in the presence of supraventricular arrhythmia, ischaemic heart disease, male subjects but was decreased in patients over 70. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the prescription of recommended medications including ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers remains limited and that the daily dosage remains low, particularly for beta-blockers. The survey also identifies several important factors including age, gender, type of hospital ward, co morbid factors which influence the prescription of heart failure medication at discharge.
  •  
8.
  • Lainscak, M., et al. (author)
  • International variations in the treatment and co-morbidity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: data from the EuroHeart Failure Survey
  • 2007
  • In: European journal of heart failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842. ; 9:3, s. 292-9
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: Treatment of heart failure (HF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is effective, but many patients are not treated in accordance with guidelines. This may reflect a lack of adequate organisation of care or co-morbidity contra-indicating therapy. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of co-morbidities on the prescription of neurohormonal antagonists for HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The EuroHeart Failure Survey identified 10,701 patients with suspected or confirmed HF during 2000 and 2001, 64% of whom had an imaging test and 3658 had documented LVSD. This last group constitutes the focus of this report. Renal dysfunction was associated with lower prescription of ACE inhibitors at discharge (74% vs. 83%, p<0.001). Beta-blockers were less often used in patients with respiratory disease (32% vs. 53%, p<0.001). Co-morbidity did not appear to affect the use of spironolactone. There were few important international differences in uptake of key therapies amongst European countries with widely differing cultures and economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines appear successful in creating a relatively uniform approach to the treatment for HF due to LVSD in diverse medical cultures. Relevant co-morbidity seems to be responsible for a substantial reduction in the prescription of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. However, whilst co-morbidity indicates the need for greater caution, it is often not a valid contra-indication to life-saving therapy.
  •  
9.
  • Lainscak, M., et al. (author)
  • Nonpharmacologic measures and drug compliance in patients with heart failure: data from the EuroHeart Failure Survey
  • 2007
  • In: The American journal of cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9149. ; 99:6B
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Advice on lifestyle, diet, vaccination, and therapy are part of the standard management of heart failure (HF). However, there is little information on whether patients with HF recall receiving such recommendations and, if so, whether they report following them. We obtained information on the recall of and adherence to nonpharmacologic advice from patients enrolled in the EuroHeart Failure Survey. This article focuses on 2,331 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of HF during the index admission and attended an interview 12 weeks after discharge. Their mean age was 67 +/- 12 years and 38% were women. Patients recalled receiving 4.1 +/- 2.7 items of advice with higher rates in Central Europe and the Mediterranean region. Recall of dietary advice (cholesterol or fat intake, 63%; dietary salt, 60%) was higher than for some other interventions (influenza vaccination, 36%; avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 17%). Among those who recalled the advice, a substantial proportion indicated that they did not follow advice completely (cholesterol and fat intake, 61%; dietary salt, 63%; influenza vaccination, 75%; avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 80%), although few patients indicated they ignored the advice completely. Patients who recalled >4 items versus < or =4 items of advice were younger and more often received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (71% vs 62%), beta-blockers (51% vs 38%), and spironolactone (25% vs 21%). In conclusion, after hospitalization for HF, many patients do not recall nonpharmacologic advice. In addition, a substantial proportion of those who recall the advice follow it incompletely. Younger age and prescription of appropriate pharmacologic treatment are associated with higher rates of recall and implementation.
  •  
10.
  • Lainscak, M., et al. (author)
  • Recall of lifestyle advice in patients recently hospitalised with heart failure: a EuroHeart Failure Survey analysis
  • 2007
  • In: Eur J Heart Fail. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842. ; 9:11, s. 1095-103
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: There are limited data on recall and implementation of lifestyle advice in patients with heart failure (HF). AIM: To investigate what advice patients with HF recall being given, and whether they report following the advice they remember. METHODS AND RESULTS: 3261 patients with suspected HF participating in the EuroHeart Failure Survey were interviewed by a health professional 12 weeks after hospital discharge. Patients recalled receiving 46% of pre-specified items of advice and 67% reported that they followed these completely. Both recall (53%) and implementation (71%) was best in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). In multivariate analysis, younger age, male sex, patient awareness of the condition and patients reporting that they received a clear explanation of the diagnosis by a health professional, all factors associated with having LVSD, were the strongest predictors of recall. CONCLUSIONS: Recall of and adherence to advice by patients with HF in this large European cross-sectional survey was disappointing. Responsibility for patient education lies with health professionals who should ensure that patients receive and understand advice, and are able to recall and follow it. A greater awareness of the issues surrounding lifestyle advice and more evidence supporting its value could improve patient care.
  •  
11.
  • Lenzen, M. J., et al. (author)
  • Differences between patients with a preserved and a depressed left ventricular function: a report from the EuroHeart Failure Survey
  • 2004
  • In: European heart journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X. ; 25:14, s. 1214-20
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • AIMS: Due to a lack of clinical trials, scientific evidence regarding the management of patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left ventricular function (PLVF) is scarce. The EuroHeart Failure Survey provided information on the characteristics, treatment and outcomes of patients with PLVF as compared to patients with a left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a secondary analysis using data from the EuroHeart Failure Survey, only including patients with a measurement of LV function (n = 6806). We selected two groups: patients with LVSD (54%) and patients with a PLVF (46%). Patients with a PLVF were, on average, 4 years older and more often women (55% vs. 29%, respectively, p < 0.001) as compared to LVSD patients, and were more likely to have hypertension (59% vs. 50%, p < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (25% vs. 23%, p = 0.01). PLVF patients received less cardiovascular medication compared to PLVF patients, with the exception of calcium antagonists. Multivariate analysis revealed that LVSD was an independent predictor for mortality, while no differences in treatment effect on mortality between the two groups was observed. A sensitivity analysis, using different thresholds to separate patients with and without LVSD revealed comparable findings. CONCLUSIONS: In the EuroHeart Failure Survey, a high percentage of heart failure patients had PLVF. Although major clinical differences were seen between the groups, morbidity and mortality was high in both groups.
  •  
12.
  • Lenzen, M. J., et al. (author)
  • Under-utilization of evidence-based drug treatment in patients with heart failure is only partially explained by dissimilarity to patients enrolled in landmark trials: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Heart Failure
  • 2005
  • In: European heart journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 26:24, s. 2706-13
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • AIMS: Surveys on heart failure management suggest under-utilization of life-saving evidence-based treatment. Evidence-based medicine and clinical guidelines are based on the results of randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we investigated how patients who fulfilled the enrolment criteria of randomized trials were treated in real life. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected three large placebo-controlled trials of patients with chronic heart failure, in which ACE-inhibitors (ACE-Is), beta-blockers, and spironolactone proved to be safe and effective. The major enrolment criteria of trials were identified and applied to patients enrolled in the Euro Heart Survey on Heart Failure to identify the proportion of patients eligible for treatment and also treated appropriately. Of the 10 701 patients who were enrolled in the Euro Heart Survey on Heart Failure, only a small percentage (13%) would have qualified for participation in at least one of the selected trials. Patients who fulfilled enrolment criteria of the identified trials were more likely to be treated with ACE-Is (83% of SOLVD-eligible patients), beta-blockers (54% of MERIT-HF-eligible patients), and aldosterone antagonists (43% of RALES-eligible patients) than trial-ineligible patients. Almost half of SOLVD-eligible patients who were treated with ACE-Is received the target dose as recommended in the guidelines, but only <10% of MERIT-HF eligible patients who were treated with beta-blockers received the target dose. CONCLUSION: ACE-Is are widely utilized but given in lower doses than proven effective in clinical trials. beta-Blockers are underused and given in lower doses to patients who fulfil the enrolment criteria of relevant landmark trials.
  •  
13.
  • Mannheimer, C, et al. (author)
  • The problem of chronic refractory angina
  • 2002
  • In: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 23:5, s. 355-370
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • It has been recognized that there is a group of patients with severe disabling angina and coronary artery disease who are refractory to conventional forms of treatment. Although this issue has already been debated at the level of the National Societies, we felt that it was appropriate to also tackle it at the European level. This is particularly important in view of the rapid pace of growth of this problem and the lack of a standardized approach. This has encouraged the development of a variety of treatments that vary considerably in terms of cost-effectiveness and safety and require proper validation procedures. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to the problem and start a process that will lead to improvement and harmonization of the care of patients with refractory angina.
  •  
14.
  • Rivero-Ayerza, M., et al. (author)
  • New-onset atrial fibrillation is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients: results of the EuroHeart Failure Survey
  • 2008
  • In: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 29:13, s. 1618-1624
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Aims The prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) remains poorly understood. To evaluate in what way AF and its different modes of presentation affect the in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with HF. Methods and results The EuroHeart Failure Survey was conducted to ascertain how hospitalized HF patients are managed in Europe. The survey enrolled patients over a 6-week period in 115 hospitals from 24 countries. For this analysis, patients were categorized into three groups according to the type of AF, previous AF (patients known to have had AF prior to admission), new-onset AF (no previous AF with AF diagnosed during hospitalization), and no AF (no previous AF and no AF during hospitalization). Clinical variables, duration of hospitalization, and in-hospital survival status were assessed and compared among groups. Of the 10 701 patients included in the survey; 6027 (57%) had no AF, 3673 (34%) had previous AF, and 1001 (9%) had new-onset AF. Patients with new-onset AF had a longer stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) when compared with previous AF and no AF patients (mean 2.6 +/- 5.3, 1.2 +/- 3.5, and 1.5 +/- 4.1 days, respectively; P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher among patients with new-onset AF when compared with previous AF or no AF patients (12, 7, and 7% respectively; P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple clinical variables, new-onset AF (not previous AF) was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.1-2.0). Conclusion In hospitalized patients with HF, new-onset AF is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and a longer ICU and hospital stay.
  •  
15.
  •  
16.
  •  
17.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-17 of 17

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view