1. |
- Estrada, Karol, et al.
(author)
-
Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture.
- 2012
-
In: Nature genetics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1546-1718 .- 1061-4036. ; 44:5, s. 491-501
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Bone mineral density (BMD) is the most widely used predictor of fracture risk. We performed the largest meta-analysis to date on lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, including 17 genome-wide association studies and 32,961 individuals of European and east Asian ancestry. We tested the top BMD-associated markers for replication in 50,933 independent subjects and for association with risk of low-trauma fracture in 31,016 individuals with a history of fracture (cases) and 102,444 controls. We identified 56 loci (32 new) associated with BMD at genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10(-8)). Several of these factors cluster within the RANK-RANKL-OPG, mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, endochondral ossification and Wnt signaling pathways. However, we also discovered loci that were localized to genes not known to have a role in bone biology. Fourteen BMD-associated loci were also associated with fracture risk (P < 5 × 10(-4), Bonferroni corrected), of which six reached P < 5 × 10(-8), including at 18p11.21 (FAM210A), 7q21.3 (SLC25A13), 11q13.2 (LRP5), 4q22.1 (MEPE), 2p16.2 (SPTBN1) and 10q21.1 (DKK1). These findings shed light on the genetic architecture and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BMD variation and fracture susceptibility.
|
|
2. |
- Lauterlein, Jens Jacob L., et al.
(author)
-
Serum sclerostin and glucose homeostasis : No association in healthy men. Cross-sectional and prospective data from the EGIR-RISC study
- 2021
-
In: Bone. - : Elsevier BV. - 8756-3282. ; 143
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction: Sclerostin, an inhibitor of bone formation, has emerged as a potential negative regulator of glucose homeostasis. We aimed to investigate if serum sclerostin associates with insulin sensitivity, beta cell function, prediabetes or metabolic syndrome in healthy men. Materials and methods: Serum sclerostin was measured in basal and insulin-stimulated samples from 526 men without diabetes from the RISC cohort study. An OGTT was performed at baseline and after 3 years. An IVGTT and a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp were performed at baseline. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by the oral glucose sensitivity index (OGIS) and the M-value relative to insulin levels. Beta cell function was assessed by the acute and total insulin secretion (ISRtot) and by beta cell glucose sensitivity. Results: Serum sclerostin levels correlated positively with age but were similar in individuals with (n = 69) and without (n = 457) prediabetes or the metabolic syndrome. Serum sclerostin was associated with measures of neither insulin sensitivity nor beta cell function at baseline in age-adjusted analyses including all participants. However, baseline serum sclerostin correlated inversely with OGIS at follow-up in men without prediabetes (B: −0.29 (−0.57, −0.01) p = 0.045), and inversely with beta cell glucose sensitivity in men with prediabetes (B: −13.3 (−26.3, −0.2) p = 0.046). Associations between serum sclerostin and 3-year changes in measures of glucose homeostasis were not observed. Acute hyperinsulinemia suppressed serum sclerostin (p = 0.02), and this reduction correlated with OGIS and ISRtot. Conclusions: Overall, serum sclerostin was not associated with prediabetes, insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion in healthy men. The inverse relationship between serum sclerostin and insulin sensitivity at follow-up was weak and likely not of clinical relevance. The ability of insulin to reduce sclerostin, possibly promoting bone formation, needs to be clarified.
|
|
3. |
- Liu, Ching-Ti, et al.
(author)
-
Assessment of gene-by-sex interaction effect on bone mineral density
- 2012
-
In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. - : Wiley. - 1523-4681 .- 0884-0431. ; 27:10, s. 2051-2064
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Sexual dimorphism in various bone phenotypes, including bone mineral density (BMD), is widely observed; however, the extent to which genes explain these sex differences is unclear. To identify variants with different effects by sex, we examined gene-by-sex autosomal interactions genome-wide, and performed expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis and bioinformatics network analysis. We conducted an autosomal genome-wide meta-analysis of gene-by-sex interaction on lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in 25,353 individuals from 8 cohorts. In a second stage, we followed up the 12 top single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; p?
|
|
4. |
- Ruck, Kate, et al.
(author)
-
International access to research infrastructure in the Arctic
- 2022
-
In: Polar Record. - : Cambridge University Press. - 0032-2474 .- 1475-3057. ; 58
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Reliable access to Arctic research infrastructure is critical to the future of polar science. In cultivating proposals, it is essential that researchers have a deep understanding of existing platforms when selecting the appropriate research site and experimental design for projects. However, Arctic infrastructure platforms are often funded as national assets, and choices for what would be the best platform for the project are sometimes at odds with a researcher’s ability to gain access. Researchers from Arctic and non-Arctic nations are poised to benefit from reducing barriers and increasing cooperation around transnational access to Arctic infrastructure, allowing scientists to successfully execute the research that is most needed rather than what is just logistically feasible. This commentary provides a summary of findings from a workshop held at the 2021 Arctic Science Summit Week to discuss navigating “transnational” or “cross-border” access to national research infrastructure. This workshop brought together users and operators of Arctic infrastructure platforms with the three goals of identifying challenges, best practices, and possible next steps for improved collaboration.
|
|