SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "L773:2694 3026 "

Search: L773:2694 3026

  • Result 1-1 of 1
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Perlander, Angelica, et al. (author)
  • Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Intervention Versus Bypass Surgery in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Principal Target Lesion in the Femoropopliteal Segment
  • 2022
  • In: Journal of Critical Limb Ischemia. - 2694-3026. ; 2:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) commonly requires revascularization to alleviate symptoms and prevent amputation. This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery vs endovascular intervention in CLTI with femoropopliteal lesions. Methods. Between March 2011 and January 2015, a total of 160 CLTI patients, undergoing bypass surgery (n = 55) or endovascular intervention (n = 105), were included in a prospective cohort study. The main study endpoint was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) based on self-registered EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Costs were retrieved from the hospi-tal’s cost-per-patient system. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as costs per gained QALY and per avoided amputation. Results. QALYs during 2 years of follow-up were 1.04 years (95% CI, 0.89-1.18) in the bypass group and 0.95 years (95% CI, 0.84-1.07) in the endovascular group, with no significant intergroup difference. Amputation-free survival was 78% in the bypass group and 59% in the endovascular group (P<.05). The mean total cost per patient was $42,900 (95% CI, 32,400-53,500) for bypass surgery and $22,200 (95% CI, 17,800-26,600) for endovascular treatment. The cost per gained QALY and per avoided amputation with bypass surgery vs endovascular intervention was $730,000 and $104,000, respec-tively. Conclusion. At 2 years, the mean total hospital cost post bypass surgery was almost twice the cost post endovascular intervention. Although amputation-free survival was higher after bypass surgery, there was no corresponding gain in generic health status. This led to a high additional cost per QALY gained and per amputation avoided with bypass surgery compared with endovascular intervention.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-1 of 1
Type of publication
journal article (1)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (1)
Author/Editor
Svensson, Mikael, 19 ... (1)
Nordanstig, Joakim (1)
Perlander, Angelica (1)
Österberg, Klas (1)
University
University of Gothenburg (1)
Language
English (1)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Medical and Health Sciences (1)
Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view