| 1. |
- Iglesias-Garcia, J., et al.
(author)
-
Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: contrast-enhanced harmonic (CEH-EUS), quantitative-elastography (QE-EUS), or both?
- 2017
-
In: United European Gastroenterology Journal. - : Wiley. - 2050-6406 .- 2050-6414. ; 5:2, s. 236-246
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) and quantitative-elastography endoscopic ultrasound (QE-EUS) are considered useful tools for the evaluation of solid pancreatic tumors (SPT). The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEH-EUS, QE-EUS, and the combination of both for the differential diagnosis of SPT. Methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients (mean age 64.3 years, range 32-89 years, 44 male) who underwent EUS for the evaluation of SPT were prospectively included. EUS was performed with a linear Pentax-EUS and a Hitachi-Preirus processor. The mass (area A) and a reference area B were selected during QE-EUS, and results expressed as B/A (strain ratio). A strain histogram of the mass was also evaluated. Microvascularization of the tumor was evaluated over 2min during CEH-EUS after intravenous injection of 4.8mL SonoVue. Final diagnosis was based on histopathology of surgical specimens or EUS-guided tissue acquisition and clinical follow-up in non-operated cases. Diagnostic accuracy of CEH-EUS, QE-EUS, and their combination was calculated. Results: Median size of the masses was 32 mm (range 12-111). Final diagnosis was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=45), neuroendocrine tumor (n=3), inflammatory mass (n=10), pancreatic metastasis (n=2), autoimmune pancreatitis (n=1), and a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (n=1). Overall accuracies for determination of malignancy using QE-EUS, CEH-EUS, their combination, and EUS-guided tissue acquisition were 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.4-99.7), 85.5% (95% CI: 74.7-92.2), 91.9% (95% CI: 82.5-96.5), and 91.5% (95% CI: 83.6-99.5), respectively. Conclusion: The combination of QE-EUS and CEH-EUS is a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of SPT, giving complementary information. However, this combination does not significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of either of the techniques performed alone.
|
|
| 2. |
- Iglesias-Garcia, J., et al.
(author)
-
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) with the Procore (TM) needle provides inadequate material for the histological diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis
- 2018
-
In: Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas. - : Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva (SEPD). - 1130-0108. ; 110:8, s. 510-514
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis (CP) is hampered due to the low accuracy of current imaging techniques and the absence of methods for histological confirmation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the histological diagnosis of early CP. Methods: a prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study was designed. Consecutive patients referred for EUS with a clinical suspicion of CP were evaluated for inclusion into the study. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and indeterminate EUS findings for the diagnosis of CP according to the Rosemont classification. EUS-FNB of the body of the pancreas was performed with Procor(TM) needles.Tissue samples were immersed into a methanol-based buffered preservative solution for cytohistological evaluation.The quality of the samples obtained and the histological findings were evaluated. Procedure-related complications were recorded. Results: the study was stopped after eleven patients were included due to safety concerns and poor diagnostic yield. The mean age of the patients was 50.3 years (range 33-70 years) and six were male. Samples were of poor quality in five cases, but were sufficient for cell-block evaluation. An inflammatory infiltration with mild fibrosis was identified in two cases and neither inflammatory infiltration nor fibrosis was identified in three cases. With regard to the other six cases, isolated inflammatory cells were observed in one case, although the cellularity was poor and unsuitable for cytological evaluation in five cases.There was one major complication (9.1%) of acute pancreatitis that required hospitalization for 48 hours. Conclusion: EUS-FNB is technically feasible in patients with EUS findings categorized as indeterminate for a CP diagnosis. However, the diagnostic yield is poor and there is a non-negligible risk of complications.
|
|
