SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Bemelman Willem A) "

Search: WFRF:(Bemelman Willem A)

  • Result 1-3 of 3
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Bonjer, H Jaap, et al. (author)
  • A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.
  • 2015
  • In: The New England journal of medicine. - 1533-4406. ; 372:14, s. 1324-32
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is widely used. However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outcomes in rectal cancer is lacking. A trial was designed to compare 3-year rates of cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area (locoregional recurrence) and survival after laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer.
  •  
2.
  • Kaçmaz, Enes, et al. (author)
  • International survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive surgery in small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms
  • 2022
  • In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 48:6, s. 1251-1257
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • INTRODUCTION: Although minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard technique in gastrointestinal surgery, implementation for small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) is lagging behind. The aim of this international survey was to gain insights into attitudes towards minimally invasive surgery for resection of SB-NEN and current practices.METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent to surgeons between February and May 2021 via (neuro)endocrine and colorectal societies worldwide. The survey consisted of questions regarding experience of the surgeon with minimally invasive SB-NEN resection and training.RESULTS: A total of 58 responses from five societies across 20 countries were included. Forty-one (71%) respondents worked at academic centers. Thirty-seven (64%) practiced colorectal surgery, 24 (41%) endocrine surgery and 45 (78%) had experience in advanced minimally invasive surgery. An open, laparoscopic or robotic approach was preferred by 23 (42%), 24 (44%), and 8 (15%) respondents, respectively. Reasons to opt for a minimally invasive approach were mainly related to peri-operative benefits, while an open approach was preferred for optimal mesenteric lymphadenectomy and tactile feedback. Additional training in minimally invasive SB-NEN resection was welcomed by 29 (52%) respondents. Forty-three (74%) respondents were interested in collaborating in future studies, with a cumulative median (IQR) annual case load of 172 (86-258).CONCLUSIONS: Among respondents, 69% applies minimally invasive surgery for resection of SB-NEN. Arguments for specific operative approaches differ, and insufficient training in advanced laparoscopic techniques seems to be a barrier. Future collaborative studies can provide better insight in selection criteria and optimal technique.
  •  
3.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-3 of 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view