| 1. |
- Delewi, Ronak, et al.
(author)
-
Clinical and Procedural Characteristics Associated With Higher Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Angiography.
- 2013
-
In: Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. - 1941-7632. ; 6, s. 501-506
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: WE AIM TO STUDY THE CLINICAL AND PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER RADIATION EXPOSURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS (PCIS) AND CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY.METHODS AND RESULTS: OUR PRESENT STUDY INCLUDED ALL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PCI PROCEDURES IN 5 PCI CENTERS IN THE WESTERN PART OF SWEDEN, BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 2008, AND JANUARY 19, 2012. THE RADIATION EXPOSURE AND CLINICAL DATA WERE COLLECTED PROSPECTIVELY IN THESE 5 PCI CENTERS IN SWEDEN AS PART OF THE SWEDISH CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND ANGIOPLASTY REGISTRY (SCAAR). A PREDICTION MODEL WAS MADE FOR THE RADIATION EXPOSURE (DOSEAREA PRODUCT) EXPRESSED IN GYCM(2). A TOTAL OF 20 669 PROCEDURES WERE INCLUDED IN THE PRESENT STUDY, CONSISTING OF 9850 PCI AND 10 819 CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURES. IN MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSES, BODY MASS INDEX (=1.04; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL [CI], 1.041.04; P0.001); HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY (=1.32; CI, 1.281.32; P0.001); 2, 3, OR 4 TREATED LESIONS (2 TREATED LESIONS: =1.95; CI, 1.842.03; P0.001; 3 TREATED LESIONS: =2.34; CI, 2.162.53; P0.001; AND 4 TREATED LESIONS: =2.83; CI, 2.533.16; P0.001); AND CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION LESIONS (=1.39; CI, 1.311.48; P0.001) WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIGHEST RADIATION EXPOSURE. AFTER ADJUSTING FOR PROCEDURAL COMPLEXITY, RADIAL ACCESS ROUTE WAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RADIATION EXPOSURE (=1.00; CI, 0.981.03; P=0.67).CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study population to assess radiation exposure, we found that high body mass index, history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, number of treated lesions, and chronic total occlusions were associated with the highest patient radiation exposure. Radial access site was not associated with higher radiation exposure when compared with femoral approach.
|
|
| 2. |
- Simard, Trevor, et al.
(author)
-
Impact of Center Experience on Patient Radiation Exposure During Transradial Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention : A Patient-Level, International, Collaborative, Multi-Center Analysis
- 2016
-
In: Journal of the American Heart Association. - Hoboken, USA : Wiley-Blackwell. - 2047-9980. ; 5:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The adoption of the transradial (TR) approach over the traditional transfemoral (TF) approach has been hampered by concerns of increased radiation exposure-a subject of considerable debate within the field. We performed a patient-level, multi-center analysis to definitively address the impact of TR access on radiation exposure.Methods and Results: Overall, 10 centers were included from 6 countries-Canada (2 centers), United Kingdom (2), Germany (2), Sweden (2), Hungary (1), and The Netherlands (1). We compared the radiation exposure of TR versus TF access using measured dose-area product (DAP). To account for local variations in equipment and exposure, standardized TR:TF DAP ratios were constructed per center with procedures separated by coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 57 326 procedures, we demonstrated increased radiation exposure with the TR versus TF approach, particularly in the CA cohort across all centers (weighted-average ratios: CA, 1.15; PCI, 1.05). However, this was mitigated by increasing TR experience in the PCI cohort across all centers (r=-0.8; P=0.005). Over time, as a center transitioned to increasing TR experience (r=0.9; P=0.001), a concomitant decrease in radiation exposure occurred (r=-0.8; P=0.006). Ultimately, when a center's balance of TR to TF procedures approaches 50%, the resultant radiation exposure was equivalent.Conclusions: The TR approach is associated with a modest increase in patient radiation exposure. However, this increase is eliminated when the TR and TF approaches are used with equal frequency-a guiding principle for centers adopting the TR approach.
|
|
