SwePub - search: WFRF:(Engelhardtsen S)

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Andreasen, F M, et al. (author) Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study. 1995 In: Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). - 0033-6572. ; 26:10, s. 669-81 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract In three Scandinavian dental facilities, a series of 334 permanent incisors with fractures of the crown or crown and root was treated by reattachment of the fragment with a resin composite. Two centers (Oslo and Stockholm) employed acid etching of enamel alone for fragment bonding (n = 146), while the third center (Copenhagen) used a combination of enamel etching and dentinal bonding (n = 188). Although the final retention rate of fragment bonding was similar in the two groups, it took the dentinal bonding group almost three times as long to drop to 50% fragment retention. This difference could be attributed to greater bonding strength in the dentinal bonding group, greater risk of second injury in the younger acid-etching group, or difficulty in maintaining a dry operative field in the younger age group. The good fragment retention, acceptable esthetics, and pulpal vitality observed in the present series indicate that reattachment of the coronal fragment is a realistic alternative to placement of conventional resin-composite restorations.

Andreasen, F M, et al. (author)
Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study.
1995
In: Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). - 0033-6572. ; 26:10, s. 669-81
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In three Scandinavian dental facilities, a series of 334 permanent incisors with fractures of the crown or crown and root was treated by reattachment of the fragment with a resin composite. Two centers (Oslo and Stockholm) employed acid etching of enamel alone for fragment bonding (n = 146), while the third center (Copenhagen) used a combination of enamel etching and dentinal bonding (n = 188). Although the final retention rate of fragment bonding was similar in the two groups, it took the dentinal bonding group almost three times as long to drop to 50% fragment retention. This difference could be attributed to greater bonding strength in the dentinal bonding group, greater risk of second injury in the younger acid-etching group, or difficulty in maintaining a dry operative field in the younger age group. The good fragment retention, acceptable esthetics, and pulpal vitality observed in the present series indicate that reattachment of the coronal fragment is a realistic alternative to placement of conventional resin-composite restorations.

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Engelhardtsen S) "