| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Oldgren, Jonas, et al.
(author)
-
Variations in Cause and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in a Prospective Registry of 15 400 Emergency Department Patients in 46 Countries The RE-LY Atrial Fibrillation Registry
- 2014
-
In: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 129:15, s. 1568-1576
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia; however, little is known about patients in a primary care setting from high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Methods and Results This prospective registry enrolled patients presenting to an emergency department with AF at 164 sites in 46 countries representing all inhabited continents. Patient characteristics were compared among 9 major geographic regions. Between September 2008 and April 2011, 15 400 patients were enrolled. The average age was 65.9, standard deviation 14.8 years, ranging from 57.2, standard deviation 18.8 years in Africa, to 70.1, standard deviation 13.4 years in North America, P<0.001. Hypertension was globally the most common risk factor for AF, ranging in prevalence from 41.6% in India to 80.7% in Eastern Europe, P<0.001. Rheumatic heart disease was present in only 2.2% of North American patients, in comparison with 21.5% in Africa and 31.5% in India, P<0.001. The use of oral anticoagulation among patients with a CHADS(2) score of 2 was greatest in North America (65.7%) but was only 11.2% in China, P<0.001. The mean time in the therapeutic range was 62.4% in Western Europe, 50.9% in North America, but only between 32% and 40% in India, China, Southeast Asia, and Africa, P<0.001. Conclusions There is a large global variation in age, risk factors, concomitant diseases, and treatment of AF among regions. Improving outcomes globally requires an understanding of this variation and the conduct of research focused on AF associated with different underlying conditions and treatment of AF and predisposing conditions in different socioeconomic settings.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kloosterman, Marielle, et al.
(author)
-
Characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients without traditional risk factors : an RE-LY AF registry analysis
- 2020
-
In: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 22:6, s. 870-877
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims: Data on patient characteristics, prevalence, and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients without traditional risk factors, often labelled 'lone AF', are sparse. Methods and results: The RE-LY AF registry included 15 400 individuals who presented to emergency departments with AF in 47 countries. This analysis focused on patients without traditional risk factors, including age >= 60years, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, congenital heart disease, pulmonary disease, valve heart disease, hyperthyroidism, and prior cardiac surgery. Patients without traditional risk factors were compared with age- and region-matched controls with traditional risk factors (1:3 fashion). In 796 (5%) patients, no traditional risk factors were present. However, 98% (779/796) had less-established or borderline risk factors, including borderline hypertension (130-140/80-90mmHg; 47%), chronic kidney disease (eGFR<60mL/min; 57%), obesity (body mass index>30; 19%), diabetes (5%), excessive alcohol intake (>14 units/week; 4%), and smoking (25%). Compared with patients with traditional risk factors (n=2388), patients without traditional risk factors were more often men (74% vs. 59%, P<0.001) had paroxysmal AF (55% vs. 37%, P<0.001) and less AF persistence after 1 year (21% vs. 49%, P<0.001). Furthermore, 1-year stroke occurrence rate (0.6% vs. 2.0%, P=0.013) and heart failure hospitalizations (0.9% vs. 12.5%, P<0.001) were lower. However, risk of AF-related re-hospitalization was similar (18% vs. 21%, P=0.09). Conclusion: Almost all patients without traditionally defined AF risk factors have less-established or borderline risk factors. These patients have a favourable 1-year prognosis, but risk of AF-related re-hospitalization remains high. Greater emphasis should be placed on recognition and management of less-established or borderline risk factors.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
