SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Hong Antony B.) "

Search: WFRF:(Hong Antony B.)

  • Result 1-4 of 4
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • 2019
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
  •  
2.
  • Berndt, Sonja I., et al. (author)
  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 11 new loci for anthropometric traits and provides insights into genetic architecture
  • 2013
  • In: Nature Genetics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1061-4036 .- 1546-1718. ; 45:5, s. 501-U69
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Approaches exploiting trait distribution extremes may be used to identify loci associated with common traits, but it is unknown whether these loci are generalizable to the broader population. In a genome-wide search for loci associated with the upper versus the lower 5th percentiles of body mass index, height and waist-to-hip ratio, as well as clinical classes of obesity, including up to 263,407 individuals of European ancestry, we identified 4 new loci (IGFBP4, H6PD, RSRC1 and PPP2R2A) influencing height detected in the distribution tails and 7 new loci (HNF4G, RPTOR, GNAT2, MRPS33P4, ADCY9, HS6ST3 and ZZZ3) for clinical classes of obesity. Further, we find a large overlap in genetic structure and the distribution of variants between traits based on extremes and the general population and little etiological heterogeneity between obesity subgroups.
  •  
3.
  • Schweinsberg, Martin, et al. (author)
  • Same data, different conclusions : Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
  • 2021
  • In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. - : Elsevier BV. - 0749-5978 .- 1095-9920. ; 165, s. 228-249
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists' gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for orga-nizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed.
  •  
4.
  • Mansouri, Kamel, et al. (author)
  • CoMPARA : Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity
  • 2020
  • In: Journal of Environmental Health Perspectives. - 0091-6765 .- 1552-9924. ; 128:2, s. 1-17
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling.OBJECTIVES: In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP).METHODS: The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP's list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast (TM) metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast (TM)/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays.RESULTS: The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set.DISCUSSION: The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of similar to 875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-4 of 4
Type of publication
journal article (4)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (4)
Author/Editor
Kelly, Daniel (1)
Bengtsson-Palme, Joh ... (1)
Nilsson, Henrik (1)
Khaw, Kay-Tee (1)
Kelly, Ryan (1)
Li, Ying (1)
show more...
Moore, Matthew D. (1)
Groop, Leif (1)
Liu, Yang (1)
Vandenput, Liesbeth, ... (1)
Lorentzon, Mattias, ... (1)
Salomaa, Veikko (1)
Jula, Antti (1)
Perola, Markus (1)
Liu, Fang (1)
Zhang, Yao (1)
Jin, Yi (1)
Raza, Ali (1)
Rafiq, Muhammad (1)
Zhang, Kai (1)
Khatlani, T (1)
Kahan, Thomas (1)
Lind, Lars (1)
Viikari, Jorma (1)
Sörelius, Karl, 1981 ... (1)
Nilsonne, Gustav (1)
van den Akker, Olmo ... (1)
Schweinsberg, Martin (1)
Silberzahn, Raphael (1)
Uhlmann, Eric Luis (1)
Kuh, Diana (1)
Berndt, Sonja I (1)
Chanock, Stephen J (1)
Batra, Jyotsna (1)
Roobol, Monique J (1)
Ouwehand, Willem H. (1)
Soranzo, Nicole (1)
Backman, Lars (1)
Campbell, Harry (1)
Rudan, Igor (1)
Ohlsson, Claes, 1965 (1)
Yan, Hong (1)
Strachan, David P (1)
Pedersen, Nancy (1)
Deloukas, Panos (1)
Schmidt, Axel (1)
Lorkowski, Stefan (1)
Thrift, Amanda G. (1)
Zhang, Wei (1)
Hammerschmidt, Sven (1)
show less...
University
Karolinska Institutet (4)
University of Gothenburg (2)
Umeå University (2)
Uppsala University (2)
Stockholm University (2)
Lund University (2)
show more...
Royal Institute of Technology (1)
Halmstad University (1)
Linköping University (1)
Stockholm School of Economics (1)
Chalmers University of Technology (1)
show less...
Language
English (4)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Natural sciences (3)
Medical and Health Sciences (3)
Social Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view