| 1. |
- Bernhardt, Julie, et al.
(author)
-
Why hospital design matters : A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care
- 2022
-
In: International Journal of Stroke. - : SAGE Publications. - 1747-4930 .- 1747-4949. ; 17:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Healthcare facilities are among the most expensive buildings to construct, maintain, and operate. How building design can best support healthcare services, staff, and patients is important to consider. In this narrative review we outline why the healthcare environment matters and describe areas of research focus and current built environment evidence that supports health care in general and stroke care in particular. Ward configuration, corridor design, and staff station placements can all impact care provision, staff and patient behaviour. Contrary to many new ward design approaches, single bed rooms are neither uniformly favoured, nor strongly evidence-based, for people with stroke. Green spaces are important both for staff (helping to reduce stress and errors), patients and relatives, although access to, and awareness of, these and other communal spaces is often poor. Built environment research specific to stroke is limited but increasing and we highlight emerging collaborative multi-stakeholder partnerships (Living Labs) contributing to this evidence base. We believe that involving engaged and informed clinicians in design and research will help shape better hospitals of the future.
|
|
| 2. |
- Elf, Marie, 1962-, et al.
(author)
-
A Systematic Review of Research Gaps in the Built Environment of Inpatient Healthcare Settings
- 2024
-
In: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. - 1937-5867 .- 2167-5112.
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: This study utilized the evidence-gap map method and critically examined the scope, methodologies, and focus of the studies that investigated the influence of the built environment on inpatient healthcare settings over a decade (2010-2021).METHODS: We conducted a systematic review per the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and surveyed 406 articles, primarily from North America and Europe.RESULTS: Our findings revealed a dominant focus on architectural features (73%), such as room design and ward layout. Comparatively, there was less emphasis on interior-, ambient-, social-, and nature-related features. Most previous studies explored multiple environmental features, which indicated the intricacy of this field. Research outcomes were diverse, with person-centered care (PCC) being the most frequently investigated, followed by safe care, emotional well-being, activity, and behavior. Furthermore, research methods varied considerably based on the study's outcomes and features. Clinical outcomes and safe care favored quantitative methods, activity and behavior favored mixed methods, and PCC favored qualitative research.CONCLUSION: This review provides an in-depth overview of the existing studies on healthcare design research and sheds light on the current trends and methodological choices. The insights garnered can guide future research, policy-making, and the development of healthcare facilities.
|
|
| 3. |
- Kylén, Maya, et al.
(author)
-
Built Environments to Support Rehabilitation for People With Stroke From the Hospital to the Home (B-Sure) : Protocol for a Mixed Method Participatory Co-Design Study
- 2023
-
In: JMIR Research Protocols. - 1929-0748. ; 12
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A global trend is to move rehabilitation closer to people's neighborhoods and homes. Still, little attention has been given to how the built environment outside the hospital setting might impact rehabilitation and recovery for stroke survivors.OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of this project is to develop conceptual models of built environments that support stroke rehabilitation and recovery outside the hospital setting. Specifically, the project will explore factors and characteristics of the built environment that support people with stroke and their families and identify innovative built environments that can be designed for local health care. The project will examine facilitators and obstacles for implementing built environmental solutions and evaluate the potential benefits, feasibility, and acceptability.METHODS: The project uses a mixed methods design approach with 3 phases. In phase 1, factors and characteristics of the built environment for rehabilitation will be identified. Based on the results from phase 1, phase 2 will involve co-designing prototypes of environments to support the rehabilitation process for people with stroke. Finally, the prototypes will be evaluated in phase 3. Qualitative and quantitative methods will include a literature review, a concept mapping (CM) study, stakeholder interviews, prototype development, and testing. The project will use multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analysis, descriptive statistics for quantitative data, and content analysis for qualitative data. Location analysis will rely on the location-allocation model for network problems, and the rule-based analysis will be based on geographic information systems data.RESULTS: As of the submission of this protocol, ethical approval for the CM study and the interview study has been obtained. Data collection is planned to start in September 2023 and the workshops later in the same year. The scoping review is ongoing from January 2023. The CM study is ongoing and will be finalized in the spring of 2024. We expect to finish the data analysis in the second half of 2024. The project is a 3-year project and will continue until December 2025.CONCLUSIONS: We aim to determine how new environments could better support a person's control over their day, environment, goals, and ultimately control over their recovery and rehabilitation activities. This "taking charge" approach would have the greatest chance of transferring the care closer to the patient's home. By co-designing with multiple stakeholders, we aim to create solutions with the potential for rapid implementation. The project's outcomes may target other people with frail health after a hospital stay or older persons in Sweden and anywhere else. The impact and social benefits include collaboration between important stakeholders to explore how new environments can support the transition to local health care, co-design, and test of new conceptual models of environments that can promote health and well-being for people post stroke.INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52489.
|
|
| 4. |
- Shannon, Michelle, et al.
(author)
-
Bringing the single versus multi-patient room debate to vulnerable patient populations : a systematic review of the impact of room types on hospitalized older people and people with neurological disorders
- 2020
-
In: Intelligent Buildings International. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1750-8975 .- 1756-6932. ; 12:3, s. 180-198
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Single-patient rooms are commonly recommended in acute hospital environments. People with neurological disorders, and those who are older, have complex clinical presentations requiring support and recovery for physical, cognitive, and social consequences of their brain injury, and/or chronic health problems. It is currently unknown what type of patient room, or what physical characteristics in such rooms, might be most desirable for the recovery of such people. We explored how hospital single-patient rooms are similar to or different from multi-bed rooms, and how the impact of room type has been measured in this group of people. A systematic mixed studies review was conducted to interrogate these questions. We identified 182 studies (mostly quantitative in design), 19 of which proceeded to formal data extraction. The findings show lack of clarity of salient physical characteristics in either room type for our review population. Importantly, apart from some signal of infection control benefits, our findings do not show evidence to support the use of single-patient rooms with older people and people with neurological disorders for other important outcomes. More investigation of the under-recognized potential of the patient room environment for shaping patient physical, cognitive, and social well-being in specific hospitalized populations is required.
|
|
| 5. |
- Shannon, Michelle M, et al.
(author)
-
Re-Imagining Hospital Patient Room Design for People After stroke : A Randomized Controlled Study Using Virtual Reality
- 2024
-
In: Stroke. - 0039-2499 .- 1524-4628. ; 55:7, s. 1895-1903
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The hospital's physical environment can impact health and well-being. Patients spend most of their time in their hospital rooms. However, little experimental evidence supports specific physical design variables in these rooms, particularly for people poststroke. The study aimed to explore the influence of patient room design variables modeled in virtual reality using a controlled experimental design.METHODS: Adults within 3 years of stroke who had spent >2 nights in hospital for stroke and were able to consent were included (Melbourne, Australia). Using a factorial design, we immersed participants in 16 different virtual hospital patient rooms in both daytime and nighttime conditions, systematically varying design attributes: patient room occupancy, social connectivity, room size (spaciousness), noise (nighttime), greenery outlook (daytime). While immersed, participants rated their affect (Pick-A-Mood Scale) and preference. Mixed-effect regression analyses were used to explore participant responses to design variables in both daytime and nighttime conditions. Feasibility and safety were monitored throughout. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Trial ID: ACTRN12620000375954.RESULTS: Forty-four adults (median age, 67 [interquartile range, 57.3-73.8] years, 61.4% male, and a third with stroke in the prior 3-6 months) completed the study in 2019-2020. We recorded and analyzed 701 observations of affective responses (Pick-A-Mood Scale) in the daytime (686 at night) and 698 observations of preference responses in the daytime (685 nighttime) while continuously immersed in the virtual reality scenarios. Although single rooms were most preferred overall (daytime and nighttime), the relationship between affective responses differed in response to different combinations of nighttime noise, social connectivity, and greenery outlook (daytime). The virtual reality scenario intervention was feasible and safe for stroke participants.CONCLUSIONS: Immediate affective responses can be influenced by exposure to physical design variables other than room occupancy alone. Virtual reality testing of how the physical environment influences patient responses and, ultimately, outcomes could inform how we design new interventions for people recovering after stroke.REGISTRATION: URL: https://anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12620000375954.
|
|
