| 1. |
- Chourpiliadis, Charilaos, et al.
(author)
-
Short-term improvement of mental health after a COVID-19 vaccination.
- 2023
-
In: PloS one. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 18:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The role of COVID-19 vaccination on the mental health of the general population remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the short-term change in depressive and anxiety symptoms in relation to COVID-19 vaccination among Swedish adults.A prospective study of 7,925 individuals recruited from ongoing cohort studies at the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, or through social media campaigns, with monthly data collections on self-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms from December 2020 to October 2021 and COVID-19 vaccination from July to October 2021. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms (defined as a self-reported total score of ≥10 in PHQ-9 and GAD-7, respectively) was calculated one month before, one month after the first dose, and, if applicable, one month after the second dose. For individuals not vaccinated or choosing not to report vaccination status (unvaccinated individuals), we selected three monthly measures of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 with 2-month intervals in-between based on data availability.5,079 (64.1%) individuals received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine, 1,977 (24.9%) received one dose, 305 (3.9%) were not vaccinated, and 564 (7.1%) chose not to report vaccination status. There was a lower prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among vaccinated, compared to unvaccinated individuals, especially after the second dose. Among individuals receiving two doses of vaccine, the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms was lower after both first (aRR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.76-0.88 for depression; aRR = 0.81, 95%CI 0.73-0.89 for anxiety) and second (aRR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.85 for depression; aRR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.66-0.81 for anxiety) dose, compared to before vaccination. Similar results were observed among individuals receiving only one dose (aRR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.68-0.84 for depression; aRR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72-0.94 for anxiety), comparing after first dose to before vaccination.We observed a short-term improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms among adults receiving COVID-19 vaccines in the current pandemic. Our findings provide new evidence to support outreach campaigns targeting hesitant groups.
|
|
| 2. |
- Foucher, Juliette, et al.
(author)
-
Validity and reliability measures of the Swedish Karolinska version of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (SK-ECAS)
- 2023
-
In: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration. - : Taylor & Francis. - 2167-8421 .- 2167-9223. ; 24:7-8, s. 713-718
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: Cognitive and behavioral impairment is observed in up to 50% of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS) is a 5-domain screening tool customized for quick cognitive screening in patients with ALS. Although the ECAS is available in Swedish at the Karolinska University Hospital (SK-ECAS), it has not yet been validated in Sweden stressing the need to assess validity and reliability of the SK-ECAS Version A.Methods: The study included 176 patients with ALS or other motor neuron disease diagnosed between September 2017 and October 2021 at the Karolinska ALS Clinical Research Center in Stockholm, Sweden, and 35 age-matched healthy control subjects. SK-ECAS was validated against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and optimal cutoffs, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.Results: We identified an optimal cutoff of 108 for the SK-ECAS total score and 82 for the SK-ECAS ALS-specific score to detect cognitive impairment. The SK-ECAS showed good performance in indicating abnormal cognition with an AUC of 0.73 for SK-ECAS ALS-specific score and 0.77 for SK-ECAS total score. There was good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.79.Conclusions: This study demonstrates good validity and reliability indices for SK-ECAS Version A for the detection of cognitive impairment in newly diagnosed ALS patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Kläppe, Ulf, et al.
(author)
-
Neurodegenerative biomarkers outperform neuroinflammatory biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
- 2023
-
In: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration. - 2167-9223. ; 25:1-2, s. 150-61
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- To describe the diagnostic and prognostic performance, and longitudinal trajectories, of potential biomarkers of neuroaxonal degeneration and neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).This case-control study included 192 incident ALS patients, 42 ALS mimics, 114 neurological controls, and 117 healthy controls from Stockholm, Sweden. Forty-four ALS patients provided repeated measurements. We assessed biomarkers of (1)neuroaxonal degeneration: neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and NfL in serum, and (2)neuroinflammation: chitotriosidase-1 (CHIT1) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in CSF. To evaluate diagnostic performance, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC). To estimate prognostic performance, we applied quantile regression and Cox regression. We used linear regression models with robust standard errors to assess temporal changes over time.Neurofilaments performed better at differentiating ALS patients from mimics (AUC: pNfH 0.92, CSF NfL 0.86, serum NfL 0.91) than neuroinflammatory biomarkers (AUC: CHIT1 0.71, MCP-1 0.56). Combining biomarkers did not improve diagnostic performance. Similarly, neurofilaments performed better than neuroinflammatory biomarkers at predicting functional decline and survival. The stratified analysis revealed differences according to the site of onset: in bulbar patients, neurofilaments and CHIT1 performed worse at predicting survival and correlations were lower between biomarkers. Finally, in bulbar patients, neurofilaments and CHIT1 increased longitudinally but were stable in spinal patients.Biomarkers of neuroaxonal degeneration displayed better diagnostic and prognostic value compared with neuroinflammatory biomarkers. However, in contrast to spinal patients, in bulbar patients neurofilaments and CHIT1 performed worse at predicting survival and seemed to increase over time.
|
|
