| 1. |
- Campo, E, et al.
(author)
-
The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee
- 2022
-
In: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 1528-0020 .- 0006-4971. ; 140:11, s. 1229-1253
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Since the publication of the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms in 1994, subsequent updates of the classification of lymphoid neoplasms have been generated through iterative international efforts to achieve broad consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, molecular scientists, and clinicians. Significant progress has recently been made in the characterization of malignancies of the immune system, with many new insights provided by genomic studies. They have led to this proposal. We have followed the same process that was successfully used for the third and fourth editions of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms. The definition, recommended studies, and criteria for the diagnosis of many entities have been extensively refined. Some categories considered provisional have now been upgraded to definite entities. Terminology for some diseases has been revised to adapt nomenclature to the current knowledge of their biology, but these modifications have been restricted to well-justified situations. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many disease entities. These changes will have an impact on optimal clinical management. The conclusions of this work are summarized in this report as the proposed International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid, histiocytic, and dendritic cell tumors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Abramson, JS, et al.
(author)
-
Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study
- 2023
-
In: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 1528-0020 .- 0006-4971. ; 141:14, s. 1675-1684
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This global, phase 3 study compared lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) with standard of care (SOC) as second-line therapy for primary refractory or early relapsed (≤12 months) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Adults eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were randomized 1:1 to liso-cel (100×106 CAR+ T cells) or SOC (3 cycles of platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in responders). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) by independent review. A total of 184 patients were randomized. In this primary analysis with a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median EFS was not reached (NR) for liso-cel versus 2.4 months for SOC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.356; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.243‒0.522). Complete response (CR) rate was 74% for liso-cel versus 43% for SOC (P < .0001) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was NR for liso-cel versus 6.2 months for SOC (HR = 0.400; 95% CI: 0.261‒0.615; P < .0001). Median overall survival was NR for liso-cel versus 29.9 months for SOC (HR = 0.724; 95% CI: 0.443‒1.183; P = .0987). When adjusted for crossover from SOC to liso-cel, median overall survival was NR for liso-cel and SOC (HR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.251‒0.686). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 1% and 4% of patients in the liso-cel arm, respectively (no grade 4/5 events). These data show significant improvements in EFS, CR rate, and PFS for liso-cel over SOC and support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment compared with SOC in patients with primary refractory or early relapsed LBCL. (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03575351.)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
- Morschhauser, F., et al.
(author)
-
Results of a phase I/II study of ocrelizumab, a fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb, in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma
- 2010
-
In: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-8041 .- 0923-7534. ; 21:9, s. 1870-1876
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Ocrelizumab is a humanized anti-CD20 antibody with increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity compared with rituximab. This phase I/II study evaluated its safety and efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after prior rituximab therapy. Design and methods: Forty-seven patients were treated in three dose cohorts and received eight infusions every 3 weeks: cohort A, 200 mg/m(2) (n = 15); cohort B, 375 mg/m(2) (n = 16); cohort C, first dose 375 mg/m(2), seven subsequent doses of 750 mg/m(2) (n = 16). Patients were assessed for safety, efficacy, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Results: The median patient age was 58 years, the majority had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease and had received a median of 2 (range 1-6) prior regimens. Ocrelizumab was well tolerated with grade 3/4 toxicity occurring in 9% of patients. The most common toxicity was infusion-related reactions (74% patients), all grade 1/2 except one grade 3 event. The objective response rate was 38% and was similar in patients with low-affinity and high-affinity variants of the Fc gamma receptor IIIa (Fc gamma RIIIa). With follow-up of similar to 28 months, the median progression-free survival was 11.4 months. Conclusion: Ocrelizumab demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed/refractory FL following prior rituximab treatment, with safety similar to rituximab although adverse events appeared milder.
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
| 21. |
|
|
| 22. |
|
|
| 23. |
|
|
| 24. |
|
|
| 25. |
|
|
| 26. |
|
|
| 27. |
|
|
