1. |
- Claassen, Yvette H. M., et al.
(author)
-
Treatment and survival of rectal cancer patients over the age of 80 years : a EURECCA international comparison
- 2018
-
In: British Journal of Cancer. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 0007-0920 .- 1532-1827. ; 119:4, s. 517-522
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for older rectal cancer patients remains unclear. The current study aimed to compare treatment and survival of rectal cancer patients aged 80+.METHODS: Patients of >= 80 years diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2001 and 2010 were included. Population-based cohorts from Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), the Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO) and Sweden (SE) were compared side by side for neighbouring countries on treatment strategy and 5-year relative survival (RS), adjusted for sex and age. Analyses were performed separately for stage I-III patients and stage IV patients.RESULTS: Overall, 19 634 rectal cancer patients were included. For stage I-III patients, 5-year RS varied from 61.7% in BE to 72.3% in SE. Proportion of preoperative radiotherapy ranged between 7.9% in NO and 28.9% in SE. For stage IV patients, 5-year RS differed from 2.8% in NL to 5.6% in BE. Rate of patients undergoing surgery varied from 22.2% in DK to 40.8% in NO.CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation was observed in the 5-year relative survival between European countries for rectal cancer patients aged 80+, next to a wide variation in treatment, especially in the use of preoperative radiotherapy in stage I-III patients and in the rate of patients undergoing surgery in stage IV patients.
|
|
2. |
- Mroczkowski, Paweł, et al.
(author)
-
European quality assurance programme in rectal cancer : are we ready to launch?
- 2012
-
In: Colorectal Disease. - : Wiley. - 1462-8910 .- 1463-1318. ; 14:8, s. 960-966
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim: There have been initiatives to create a European audit project. This paper addresses the issue of differences in data collected by different registries.Method: Patients with rectal cancer treated in 2008 and recorded in quality registries from Belgium, Germany/Poland, Spain and Sweden were analysed. The comparison included number of patients, gender, age, ASA-classification, preoperative diagnostic and staging procedures, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical treatment and quality of surgery, postoperative complications, and adjuvant treatment.Results: The Belgian database consisted of 622 patients, Germany/Poland 3,393, Spain 1,641 and Sweden 1,826. The percentage of patients in ASA-stages was highly variable.MRI-use was the highest in Spain and Sweden and very low in Germany/Poland. The percentage of cT4 stage tumours in Sweden was much higher than in all other countries. Sweden recorded the highest percentage of primary metastatic disease (20.3%), Belgium the lowest (10.2%). Neoadjuvant therapy in different protocols was administered to 41.2% patients in Germany/Poland, 50.8% in Spain, 55.2% in Belgium and 62% in Sweden.Laparoscopic surgery (conversion rate) was performed for cure in 5% (28%) of patients in Sweden, in 20.8% (20.6%) in Spain, in 28.6% (15.2%) in Belgium and in 14.5% (8.9%) in Germany/Poland.30 day mortality for anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection and Hartmann's procedure in Sweden, Belgium and Spain 2.0%, 2.3% and 3.1%, respectively. The German-Polish database reported an in-hospital mortality of 3.2%.Conclusion: A European quality assurance project in rectal cancer is possible only after data collection is standardised.
|
|
3. |
- van de Velde, Cornelis J. H., et al.
(author)
-
EURECCA colorectal : Multidisciplinary Mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe
- 2013
-
In: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier BV. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 49:13, s. 2784-2790
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last twenty years however still considerable variation exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of cancer care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012 the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about colon and rectum was held looking for multidisciplinary consensus. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.Methods: The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Experts commented and voted on the two web-based online voting rounds before the meeting (between 4th and 25th October and between the 20th November and 3rd December 2012) as well as one online round after the meeting (4th-20th March 2013) and were invited to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th-15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. All sentences that were voted on are available on the EURECCA website www.canceraudit.eu. The consensus document was divided in sections describing evidence based algorithms of diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and stage IV separately. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method.Results: The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members.Conclusions: It is feasible to achieve European Consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues using the Delphi method. This consensus embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.
|
|
4. |
- van de Velde, Cornelis J H, et al.
(author)
-
EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum.
- 2014
-
In: European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-0852 .- 0959-8049. ; 50:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last 20years; however considerable variation still exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Large variation is also apparent between national guidelines and patterns of cancer care in Europe. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of Cancer Care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012, the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about cancer of the colon and rectum was held. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.
|
|
5. |
- Vermeer, Nina C. A., et al.
(author)
-
Treatment and Survival of Patients with Colon Cancer Aged 80 Years and Older : A EURECCA International Comparison
- 2018
-
In: The Oncologist. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 1083-7159 .- 1549-490X. ; 23:8, s. 982-990
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background. Colon cancer in older patients represents a major public health issue. As older patients are hardly included in clinical trials, the optimal treatment of these patients remains unclear. The present international EURECCA comparison explores possible associations between treatment and survival outcomes in elderly colon cancer patients.Subjects, Materials, and Methods. National data from Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden were obtained, as well as a multicenter surgery cohort from Germany. Patients aged 80 years and older, diagnosed with colon cancer between 2001 and 2010, were included. The study interval was divided into two periods: 2001–2006 and 2007–2010. The proportion of surgical treatment and chemotherapy within a country and its relation to relative survival were calculated for each time frame.Results. Overall, 50,761 patients were included. At least 94% of patients with stage II and III colon cancer underwent surgical removal of the tumor. For stage II–IV, the proportion of chemotherapy after surgery was highest in Belgium and lowest in The Netherlands and Norway. For stage III, it varied from 24.8% in Belgium and 3.9% in Norway. For stage III, a better adjusted relative survival between 2007 and 2010 was observed in Sweden (adjusted relative excess risk [RER] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–0.76) and Norway (adjusted RER 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69–0.96) compared with Belgium.Conclusion. There is substantial variation in the rate of treatment and survival between countries for patients with colon cancer aged 80 years or older. Despite higher prescription of adjuvant chemotherapy, poorer survival outcomes were observed in Belgium. No clear linear pattern between the proportion of chemotherapy and better adjusted relative survival was observed.
|
|