SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Occhipinti L.) "

Search: WFRF:(Occhipinti L.)

  • Result 1-10 of 10
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  • Ferrari, A. C., et al. (author)
  • Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems
  • 2015
  • In: Nanoscale. - : Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). - 2040-3372 .- 2040-3364. ; 7:11, s. 4598-4810
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • We present the science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems, targeting an evolution in technology, that might lead to impacts and benefits reaching into most areas of society. This roadmap was developed within the framework of the European Graphene Flagship and outlines the main targets and research areas as best understood at the start of this ambitious project. We provide an overview of the key aspects of graphene and related materials (GRMs), ranging from fundamental research challenges to a variety of applications in a large number of sectors, highlighting the steps necessary to take GRMs from a state of raw potential to a point where they might revolutionize multiple industries. We also define an extensive list of acronyms in an effort to standardize the nomenclature in this emerging field.
  •  
3.
  • Teixeira, H., et al. (author)
  • Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement - Developing consensus across North America and Europe
  • 2010
  • In: Marine Pollution Bulletin. - 0025-326X. ; 60:4, s. 589-600
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Benthic indices are typically developed independently by habitat, making their incorporation into large geographic scale assessments potentially problematic because of scaling inequities. A potential solution is to establish common scaling using expert best professional judgment (BPJ). To test if experts from different geographies agree on condition assessment, sixteen experts from four regions in USA and Europe were provided species-abundance data for twelve sites per region. They ranked samples from best to worst condition and classified samples into four condition (quality) categories. Site rankings were highly correlated among experts, regardless of whether they were assessing samples from their home region. There was also good agreement on condition category, though agreement was better for samples at extremes of the disturbance gradient. The absence of regional bias suggests that expert judgment is a viable means for establishing a uniform scale to calibrate indices consistently across geographic regions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 10

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view