| 1. |
- Jaffe, Allan S., et al.
(author)
-
Single Troponin Measurement to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction: JACC Review Topic of the Week
- 2023
-
In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 82:1, s. 60-69
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The term “single-sample rule-out” refers to the ability of very low concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) on presentation to exclude acute myocardial infarction with high clinical sensitivity and negative predictive value. Observational and randomized studies have confirmed this ability. Some guidelines endorse use of a concentration of hs-cTn at the assay's limit of detection, while other studies have validated the use of higher concentrations, allowing this approach to identify a greater proportion of patients at low risk. In most studies, at least 30% of patients can be triaged with this approach. The concentration of hs-cTn varies according to the assay used and sometimes how regulations permit reporting. It is clear that patients need to be at least 2 hours from the onset of symptoms being evaluated. Caution is warranted, particularly with older patients, women, and patients with underlying cardiac comorbidities.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Lipinski, Michael J., et al.
(author)
-
Comparison of conventional and high-sensitivity troponin in patients with chest pain : A collaborative meta-analysis
- 2015
-
In: American Heart Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-8703 .- 1097-6744. ; 169:1, s. 6-16.e6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Multiple studies have evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of conventional troponin (cTn) and high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn). We performed a collaborative meta-analysis comparing cTn and hs-cTn for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and assessment of prognosis in patients with chest pain. Methods MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing both cTn and hs-cTn in patients with chest pain. Study authors were contacted and many provided previously unpublished data. Results From 17 included studies, there were 8,644 patients. Compared with baseline cTn, baseline hs-cTn had significantly greater sensitivity (0.884 vs 0.749, P < .001) and negative predictive value (NPV; 0.964 vs 0.935, P < .001), whereas specificity (0.816 vs 0.938, P < .001) and positive predictive value (0.558 vs 0.759, P < .001) were significantly reduced. Based on summary receiver operating characteristic curves, test performance for the diagnosis of AMI was not significantly different between baseline cTn and hs-cTn (0.90 [95% CI 0.85-0.95] vs 0.92 [95% CI 0.90-0.94]). In a subanalysis of 6 studies that alternatively defined AMI based on hs-cTn, cTn had lower sensitivity (0.666, P < .001) and NPV (0.906, P < .001). Elevation of baseline hs-cTn, but negative baseline cTn, was associated with increased risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction during follow-up (P < .001) compared with both negative. Conclusion High-sensitivity troponin has significantly greater early sensitivity and NPV for the diagnosis of AMI at the cost of specificity and positive predictive value, which may enable early rule in/out of AMI in patients with chest pain. Baseline hs-cTn elevation in the setting of negative cTn is also associated with increased nonfatal myocardial infarction or death during follow-up.
|
|
| 4. |
- Nowak, Richard, et al.
(author)
-
High sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients not having an acute coronary syndrome : results from the TRAPID-AMI study
- 2017
-
In: Biomarkers. - 1354-750X .- 1366-5804. ; 22:8, s. 709-714
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To describe the baseline, 1hr and delta high sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) values in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but without a final acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis.Materials and methods: hs-cTnT assay for RAPID rule out of acute myocardial infarction (TRAPID-AMI) was a prospective diagnostic trial that enrolled emergency department (ED) patients with suspected AMI. Final patient diagnoses were adjudicated by a clinical events committee and subjects placed in different clinical groups: AMI, unstable angina, non-ACS cardiac, non-cardiac and unknown origin. The baseline, 1hr and delta hs-cTnT values were analysed in the 902 non-ACS patients.Results: Amongst the 1282 studied the patient groups were 213 (17%) AMI, 167 (13%) unstable angina, 113 (9%) non-ACS cardiac, 288 (22%) non-cardiac and 501 (39%) unknown origin. The hs-cTnT values in the non-cardiac and unknown origin groups were combined. The median hs-cTnT values (ng/L) were higher (p<0.001) in the non-ACS cardiac compared to the non-cardiac/unknown origin group at baseline (11.8,<5) and 1hr (12.3,<5). Their negative predictive values were 0.955 (baseline) and 0.954 (1hr) for predicting non-ACS cardiac versus non-cardiac/unknown origin diagnoses.Conclusions: Hs-cTnT may help predict whether non-ACS ED patients have a final non-ACS cardiac or non-cardiac/unknown origin diagnoses.
|
|
