| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Walther, Sten, 1954-, et al.
(author)
-
Influence of income and education on outcomes of intensive care in a healthcare system with full universal health insurance - a nationwide analysis of individual-level data
- 2019
-
In: Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. - Santarem, Portugal : Escola Superior de Educacao de Santarem. - 2197-425X. ; 7:Supplement 3
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- INTRODUCTION. Most patients admitted to intensive care are discharged to a general ward in the same hospital, but some patients require transfer to another hospital. Indications for interhospital transfers (IHT) include referral for specialist treatment, lack of intensive care beds at the referring ICU and repatriation to ICU in home hospital [1].OBJECTIVES. To review mortality of ICU-patients undergoing IHT and analyse whether different indications for transfer render different mortalities.METHODS. Retrospective cohort register study using the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR) during 2016-2018. The SIR collects data from 98.8% of Swedish ICUs including data on discharge from ICUs to other hospitals/ICUs. Transfers were divided into three categories: transfer due to medical reasons, lack of ICU beds or repatriation to ICU in home hospital. We analysed odds ratios (ORs) for dying within 30 days after discharge from ICU using risk adjusted (SAPS3 score) multi-level mixed effect logistic regression with ICUs as random effect.RESULTS. We identified 12,356 patients who were discharged to another ICU and hospital, i.e. inter-hospital transfers. The unadjusted mortality 30 days after IHT was 17.2 % compared to 12.4 % if discharged to ward in the same hospital. Mortality after IHT varied with the cause of discharge (Figure).Main diagnoses for transfer due to specialist treatment were subarachnoid haemorrhage, head injury and multi-trauma whilst for lack of ICU beds post cardiac arrest, respiratory failure and pneumonia dominated. Risk adjusted analysis showed a significantly increased risk of dying after discharge due to lack of ICU-beds in comparison with other reasons for IHTsCONCLUSION. The adjusted risk of dying within 30 days after interhospital transfer was greater among critically ill patients when the transfer was due to lack of beds in the referring ICU. The increased mortality lingered for at least 6 months underlining the importance to identify causes and intervene to avoid unnecessary loss of life.
|
|
| 5. |
- Berger-Estilita, Joana, et al.
(author)
-
A new global health outcome score after trauma (GHOST) for disability, cognitive impairment, and health-related quality of life: data from a prospective cross-sectional observational study
- 2019
-
In: Brain Injury. - : Informa Healthcare. - 0269-9052 .- 1362-301X. ; 33:7, s. 922-931
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background:Trauma patients experience morbidity related to disability and cognitive impairment that negatively impact their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We assessed the impact of trauma on disability, cognitive impairment and HRQoL after intensive care in patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) and created a predictive score to identify patients with worse outcome. Methods:We identified 262 patients with severe trauma (ISSamp;gt;15) admitted to the emergency room of a level 1 trauma center. Patients above 13 years were included. After 6 months, patients were assessed for disability, cognitive impairment, and HRQoL. A global health outcome score after trauma (GHOST) was obtained through the combination of these domains. Logistic regression analysis was considered for the effect of demographic, trauma and hospital factors on global outcome. p amp;gt; 0.05. Statistics performed with SPSS 23.0. Results:Patients with the worst outcomes were older and had a longer length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. The effect of gender was found in all "GHOST dimensions". TBI was not significantly associated with worse outcome. Conclusions:No significant differences were seen on disability, cognitive impairment and decreased HRQoL in patients with or without TBI. Our GHOST score showed that female gender, older age, and longer ICU stay were significantly associated with the worst outcome. Abbreviations: AIS: Abbreviated Injury Scale; EQ-5D: EuroQol 5-dimensions; EQ-5D-3L: EuroQol 5-dimensions 3-levels; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; GOSE: Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; HRQoL: Health-Related Quality of Life; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; ISS: Injury Severity Score; MMS: Mini Mental State; NICE: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; RTS: Revised Trauma Score; TBI: Traumatic brain injury; TRISS: Trauma Injury Severity Score; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Nilsson, Andreas, et al.
(author)
-
Anxiety and depression after burn, not as bad as we think-A nationwide study
- 2019
-
In: Burns. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 0305-4179 .- 1879-1409. ; 45:6, s. 1367-1374
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: A history of psychiatric disorders is more common among patients who have had burns than in the general population. To try and find out the scale of the problem we have assessed self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression after a burn. Methods: Consecutive patients with burns measuring more than 10% total body surface area or duration of stay in hospital of seven days or more were included. Personal and clinical details about the patients were extracted from the database at each center. Data were collected from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, as well as Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL; Short Form-36, SF-36) and questionnaires about socioeconomic factors. All results were obtained 12 and 24 months after the burn, and compared with those from a reference group. Results: A total of 156 patients responded to the questionnaires. Mean (SD) age and TBSA (%) were 46 (16.4) years and 23.6 (19.2) %, respectively. There were no differences in incidence between the burn and reference groups in anxiety or depression either 12 or 24 months after the burn. Those who reported higher anxiety and depression scores also had consistently poorer HRQoL as assessed by the SF-36. Conclusion: Seen as a group, people who have had burns report anxiety and depression the same range as a reference group. Some patients, however, express more anxiety and depression, and concomitantly poorer HRQoL. These patients should be identified, and offered additional support. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 8. |
- Orwelius, Lotti, 1956-
(author)
-
Health related quality of life in adult former intensive care unit patients
- 2009
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Background: Patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) are seriously ill, have a high co‐morbidity, morbidity and mortality. ICUs are resource – demanding as they consume significant hospital resources for a minority of patients. The development of new medical procedures for critical care patients has over the years led to survival of larger numbers with more complex illnesses and extensive injuries. Improved survival rates lead to needs for outcome measures other than survival. The present study examines health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and factors assumed to be important for the long term HRQoL for former ICU patients.Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study of 980 adult patients admitted to one of three mixed medical‐surgical ICUs in Southern Sweden, during 2000 to 2004. The patients were studied at four different occasions after their critical illness: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after discharge from the ICU and hospital. HRQoL was assessed by the EuroQol 5‐Dimensions (EQ‐5D) and Medical Outcome Short Form (SF‐36), sleep disturbances by the Basic Nordic Sleep questionnaire (BNSQ), and pre‐existing diseases was collected by self‐reported disease diagnosis. Data from a large public health survey (n=6093) of the county population were used as reference group.Results: Compared with the age and sex adjusted general reference group the patients who had been in the ICU had significantly lower scores on EQ‐5D and in SF‐ 36 all eight dimensions. This was seen both for the general ICU patients as well as for the multiple trauma patients. Significant improvement over time was seen only in single and separate dimensions for the general ICU group, and for the multiple trauma group. Long term effects of ICU care on sleep patterns were found minor as 70 % reported an unchanged sleep pattern and only 9% reported worse sleep after the IC period. Pre‐existing diseases were found to be the factor that had the largest influence on HRQoL in both the short‐ and long term perspective for the general ICU patients as well as for the multiple trauma patients. It was also found to have negative impact on sleep. IC ‐related factors showed only a minor influence on HRQoL or sleep patterns after the ICU stay.Conclusions: This multicenter study shows that pre‐existing diseases influence the HRQoL short‐ and long‐term after IC, and it must be accounted for when HRQoL and outcome after IC are studied. Approximately, 50% of the decline in HRQoL for the ICU patients could be explained by pre‐existing diseases. Future research needs to focus on the remaining factors of importance for the total HRQoL impairment for these patients.
|
|
| 9. |
- Orwelius, Lotti, 1956-, et al.
(author)
-
Pre-existing disease : the most important factor for health related quality of life long-term after critical illness: a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre trial
- 2010
-
In: Critical Care. - : BioMed Central. - 1364-8535 .- 1466-609X. ; 14:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction The aim of the present multicenter study was to assess long term (36 months) health related quality of life in patients after critical illness, compare ICU survivors health related quality of life to that of the general population and examine the impact of pre-existing disease and factors related to ICU care on health related quality of life. Methods Prospective, longitudinal, multicentre trial in three combined medical and surgical intensive care units of one university and two general hospitals in Sweden. By mailed questionnaires, health related quality of life was assessed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the stay in ICU by EQ-5D and SF-36, and information of pre-existing disease was collected at the 6 months measure. ICU related factors were obtained from the local ICU database. Comorbidity and health related quality of life (EQ-5D; SF-36) was examined in the reference group. Among the 5306 patients admitted, 1663 were considered eligible (>24 hrs in the intensive care unit, and age ≥ 18 yrs, and alive 6 months after discharge). At the 6 month measure 980 (59%) patients answered the questionnaire. Of these 739 (75%) also answered at 12 month, 595 (61%) at 24 month, and 478 (47%) answered at the 36 month measure. As reference group, a random sample (n = 6093) of people from the uptake area of the hospitals were used in which concurrent disease was assessed and adjusted for. Results Only small improvements were recorded in health related quality of life up to 36 months after ICU admission. The majority of the reduction in health related quality of life after care in the ICU was related to the health related quality of life effects of pre-existing diseases. No significant effect on the long-term health related quality of life by any of the ICU-related factors was discernible. Conclusions A large proportion of the reduction in the health related quality of life after being in the ICU is attributable to pre-existing disease. The importance of the effect of pre-existing disease is further supported by the small, long term increment in the health related quality of life after treatment in the ICU. The reliability of the conclusions is supported by the size of the study populations and the long follow-up period.
|
|
| 10. |
- Orwelius, Lotti, 1956-, et al.
(author)
-
Role of preexisting disease in patients' perceptions of health-related quality of life after intensive care.
- 2005
-
In: Critical Care Medicine. - 0090-3493 .- 1530-0293. ; 33:7, s. 1557-1564
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To find out how patients perceive their health-related quality of life after they have been treated in an intensive care unit and whether preexisting disease influenced their perception. DESIGN:: Follow-up, quantitative, dual-site study. SETTING: Combined medical and surgical intensive care units of one university and one general hospital in Sweden. PATIENTS: Among the 1,938 patients admitted, 562 were considered eligible (>24 hrs in the intensive care unit, and age >18 yrs). The effect of preexisting disease was assessed by use of a large reference group, a random sample (n = 10,000) of the main intake area of the hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During 2000-2002, data were collected from the intensive care unit register and from a questionnaire mailed to the patients 6 months after their discharge from hospital. Subjects in the reference group were sent postal questionnaires during 1999. Of the patients in the intensive care unit group, 74% had preexisting diseases compared with 51% in the reference group. Six months after discharge, health-related quality of life was significantly lower among patients than in the reference group. When comparisons were restricted to the previously healthy people in both groups, the observed differences were about halved, and when we compared the patients in the intensive care unit who had preexisting diseases with subjects in the reference group who had similar diseases, we found little difference in perceived health-related quality of life. In some dimensions of health-related quality of life, we found no differences between patients in the intensive care unit and the subjects in the reference population. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting diseases significantly affect the extent of the decline of health-related quality of life after critical care, and this effect may have been underestimated in the past. As most patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit have at least one preexisting disease, it is important to account for these effects when examining outcome.
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
