SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Romundstad P. R.) "

Search: WFRF:(Romundstad P. R.)

  • Result 1-7 of 7
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  • Opdahl, S., et al. (author)
  • Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a cohort study from the CoNARTaS group
  • 2015
  • In: Human Reproduction. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0268-1161 .- 1460-2350. ; 30:7, s. 1724-1731
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • STUDY QUESTION: Is the risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies conceived following specific assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures different from the risk in spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies? SUMMARY ANSWER: ART pregnancies had a higher risk of hypertensive disorders, in particular following cryopreservation, with the highest risk seen in twin pregnancies following frozen-thawed cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The risk of hypertensive disorders is higher in ART pregnancies than in SC pregnancies. The increased risk maybe partly explained by multiple pregnancies and underlying infertility, but a contribution from specific ART procedures has not been excluded. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Population-based cohort study, including sibling design with nationwide data from health registers in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All registered ART pregnancies and a sample of SC pregnancies with gestational age >= 22 weeks from 1988 to 2007 were included. ART singleton pregnancies (n = 47 088) were compared with SC singleton pregnancies (n = 268 599), matched on parity and birth year. ART twin pregnancies (n = 10 918) were compared with SC twin pregnancies (46 674). We used logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios and risk differences for hypertensive disorders in pregnancies following IVF, ICSI and fresh or frozen-thawed cycles. We also compared freshand frozen-thawed cycles within mothers who had conceived following both procedures using conditional logistic regression (sibling analysis). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Hypertensive disorders were reported in 5.9% of ART singleton and 12.6% of ART twin pregnancies. Comparing singleton pregnancies, the risk of hypertensive disorders was higher after all ART procedures. The highest risk in singleton pregnancies was seen after frozen-thawed cycles [risk 7.0%, risk difference 1.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.8]. Comparing twin pregnancies, the risk was higher after frozen-thawed cycles (risk 19.6%, risk difference 5.1%, 95% CI 3.0-7.1), but not after fresh cycles. In siblings, the risk was higher after frozen-thawed cycles compared with fresh cycles within the same mother (odds ratio 2.63, 95% CI 1.73-3.99). There were no clear differences in risk for IVF and ICSI. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The number of ART siblings in the study was limited. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. In addition, we did not have information on all SC pregnancies in each woman's history, and could therefore not compare risk in ART versus SC pregnancies in the same mother. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Pregnancies following frozen-thawed cycles have a higher risk of hypertensive disorders, also when compared with fresh cycle pregnancies by the same mother. The safety aspects in frozen-thawed cycles merit further attention. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was received from the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, the University of Copenhagen, the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. None of the authors has any competing interests to declare.
  •  
3.
  • Skrastad, R. B., et al. (author)
  • Risk assessment for preeclampsia in nulliparous women at 11-13weeks gestational age: prospective evaluation of two algorithms
  • 2015
  • In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. - : Wiley. - 1471-0528 .- 1470-0328. ; 122:13, s. 1781-1788
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • ObjectiveTo evaluate two algorithms for prediction of preeclampsia in a population of nulliparous women in Norway. DesignProspective screening study. SettingNational Centre for Fetal Medicine in Trondheim, Norway. PopulationFive hundred and forty-one nulliparous women. MethodsThe women were examined between 11(+0) and 13(+6)weeks with interviews for maternal characteristics and measurements of mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor. The First Trimester Screening Program version 2.8 by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) was compared with the Preeclampsia Predictor TM version 1 revision 2 by Perkin Elmer (PREDICTOR). Main outcome measuresPrediction of preeclampsia requiring delivery before 37weeks, before 42weeks and late preeclampsia (delivery after 34weeks). ResultsThe performance of the two algorithms was similar, but quite poor, for prediction of preeclampsia requiring delivery before 42weeks with an area under the curve of 0.77 (0.67-0.87) and sensitivity 40% (95% CI 19.1-63.9) at a fixed 10% false positive rate for FMF and 0.74 (0.63-0.84) and sensitivity 30% (95% CI 11.9-54.3) at a fixed 10% false positive rate for PREDICTOR. The FMF algorithm for preeclampsia requiring delivery <37weeks had an area under the curve of 0.94 (0.86-1.0) and sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 28.4-99.5) at a 10% fixed false positive rate. ConclusionsFetal Medicine Foundation and PREDICTOR algorithms had similar and only modest performance in predicting preeclampsia. The results indicate that the FMF algorithm is suitable for prediction of preterm preeclampsia.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-7 of 7

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view