1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Derksen, V. F A M, et al.
(author)
-
Rheumatoid arthritis phenotype at presentation differs depending on the number of autoantibodies present
- 2017
-
In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 76, s. 716-720
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), seropositive and seronegative disease may be two entities with different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, long-term outcomes and disease presentations. However, the effect of the conjoint presence of multiple autoantibodies, as proxy for a more pronounced humoral autoimmune response, on clinical phenotype remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigates the association between the number of autoantibodies and initial clinical presentation in two independent cohorts of patients with early RA. Methods Autoantibody status (rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein antibodies and anticarbamylated protein antibodies) was determined at baseline in the Leiden Early Arthritis Cohort (n=828) and the Swedish BARFOT (Better Anti-Rheumatic Farmaco-Therapy, n=802) study. The association between the number of autoantibodies and baseline clinical characteristics was investigated using univariable and multivariable ordinal regression. Results In both cohorts, the following independent associations were found in multivariable analysis: patients with a higher number of RA-associated antibodies were younger, more often smokers, had a longer symptom duration and a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate at presentation compared with patients with few autoantibodies. Conclusions The number of autoantibodies, reflecting the breadth of the humoral autoimmune response, is associated with the clinical presentation of RA. Predisease pathophysiology is thus reflected by the initial clinical phenotype.
|
|
4. |
- Radner, H, et al.
(author)
-
2017 EULAR recommendations for a core data set to support observational research and clinical care in rheumatoid arthritis
- 2018
-
In: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 77:4, s. 476-479
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Personalised medicine, new discoveries and studies on rare exposures or outcomes require large samples that are increasingly difficult for any single investigator to obtain. Collaborative work is limited by heterogeneities, both what is being collected and how it is defined. To develop a core set for data collection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) research which (1) allows harmonisation of data collection in future observational studies, (2) acts as a common data model against which existing databases can be mapped and (3) serves as a template for standardised data collection in routine clinical practice to support generation of research-quality data. A multistep, international multistakeholder consensus process was carried out involving voting via online surveys and two face-to-face meetings. A core set of 21 items (‘what to collect’) and their instruments (‘how to collect’) was agreed: age, gender, disease duration, diagnosis of RA, body mass index, smoking, swollen/tender joints, patient/evaluator global, pain, quality of life, function, composite scores, acute phase reactants, serology, structural damage, treatment and comorbidities. The core set should facilitate collaborative research, allow for comparisons across studies and harmonise future data from clinical practice via electronic medical record systems.
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Verheul, Marije K., et al.
(author)
-
Triple positivity for anti–citrullinated protein autoantibodies, rheumatoid factor, and anti–carbamylated protein antibodies conferring high specificity for rheumatoid arthritis : implications for very early identification of at‐risk individuals
- 2018
-
In: Arthritis & Rheumatology. - Hoboken : John Wiley & Sons. - 2326-5191 .- 2326-5205. ; 70:11, s. 1721-1731
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: In rheumatoid arthritis(RA), the autoantibodies anti-citrullinated protein antibodies(ACPA) and rheumatoid factor(RF) are commonly used to aid RA diagnosis. Although these autoantibodies are mainly found in RA, their specificity is not optimal. It is therefore difficult to identify RA patients, especially in very early disease, based on the presence of ACPA and RF alone. Also, anti-carbamylated protein(anti-CarP) antibodies have diagnostic and prognostic value as the presence of anti-CarP antibodies associates with joint damage in RA patients and with future RA development in arthralgia patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the value of combined antibody testing in relation to prediction and diagnosis of (early) RA.METHODS: A literature search resulted in twelve studies, consisting of RA patients, pre-RA individuals, disease controls, healthy first-degree relatives of RA patients or healthy controls, in which data on RF, ACPA and anti-CarP antibody-status was available. Random effects meta-analyses were carried out for several antibody combinations.RESULTS: The individual antibodies are highly prevalent in RA(34%-80%) compared to the control groups, but are also present in non-RA controls(0%-23%). To classify most people correctly as RA or non-RA, the combination of ACPA and/or RF often performs well(specificity:65-100, sensitivity:59-88). However, triple positivity for ACPA, RF and anti-CarP antibodies results in a higher specificity(98-100) (accompanied by a lower sensitivity(11-39)).CONCLUSIONS: As the rheumatology field is moving towards very early identification of RA and possible screening for individuals at maximum risk in populations with a low pre-test probability, triple positivity provides interesting information on individuals at risk to develop RA.
|
|
7. |
- van Wesemael, Tineke J., et al.
(author)
-
Smoking is associated with the concurrent presence of multiple autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis rather than with anti-citrullinated protein antibodies per se : A multicenter cohort study
- 2016
-
In: Arthritis Research and Therapy. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1478-6354 .- 1478-6362. ; 18:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The contribution of smoking to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is hypothesized to be mediated through formation of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). In RA, however, autoantibodies such as ACPA, rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) often occur together, and it is thus unclear whether smoking is specifically associated with some autoantibodies rather than others. We therefore investigated whether smoking is only associated with ACPA or with the presence of multiple RA-related autoantibodies. Methods: A population-based Japanese cohort (n = 9575) was used to investigate the association of smoking with RF and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP2) in individuals without RA. Furthermore, RA patients fulfilling the 1987 criteria from three early arthritis cohorts from the Netherlands (n = 678), the United Kingdom (n = 761), and Sweden (n = 795) were used. Data on smoking, RF, anti-CCP2, and anti-CarP were available. A total score of autoantibodies was calculated, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by logistic regression. Results: In the population-based non-RA cohort, no association was found between smoking and one autoantibody (RF or anti-CCP2), but smoking was associated with double-autoantibody positivity (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.32-6.58). In RA patients, there was no association between smoking and the presence of one autoantibody (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78-1.26), but smoking was associated with double-autoantibody positivity (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.68) and triple-autoantibody positivity (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.53-2.73). Conclusions: Smoking is associated with the concurrent presence of multiple RA-associated autoantibodies rather than just ACPA. This indicates that smoking is a risk factor for breaking tolerance to multiple autoantigens in RA.
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
- Ajeganova, S., et al.
(author)
-
The association between anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies and radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis : A study exploring replication and the added value to ACPA and rheumatoid factor
- 2017
-
In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 76:1, s. 112-118
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies are reported to associate with more radiographic progression within the total rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA)-negative subgroup. We explored the association of anti-CarP with radiographic progression in RA and aimed to replicate the association and evaluate the added value of anti-CarP antibodies in relation to ACPA and rheumatoid factor (RF). Methods 576 Swedish and 628 Dutch patients with RA (2394 and 3247 sets of radiographs, respectively) were longitudinally studied. Replication was restricted to the Swedish patients. In both cohorts, the association of anti-CarP with radiographic progression was determined in strata of patients with similar ACPA and RF status; results of both cohorts were combined in fixed-effect meta-analyses. The net percentage of patients for whom the radiographic progression in 5 years was additionally correctly classified when adding anti-CarP to a model including ACPA and RF was evaluated. Results Anti-CarP associated with radiographic progression in the total Swedish RA population (beta=1.11 per year, p=8.75×10-13) and in the ACPAnegative subgroup (beta=1.14 per year, p=0.034). Anti- CarP associated with more radiographic progression in the strata of ACPA-positive/RF-negative, ACPA-negative/ RF-positive and ACPA-positive/RF-positive patients with RA (respective p values 0.014, 0.019 and 0.0056). A model including ACPA and RF correctly classified 54% and 57% of the patients; adding anti-CarP to this model did not increase these percentages (54% and 56% were correctly classified). Conclusions Anti-CarP antibodies associated with more severe radiographic progression in the total and ACPA-negative RA population. Anti-CarP-positivity had a statistically significant additive value to ACPA and RF, but did not improve correct classification of patients.
|
|
10. |
- van Delft, Myrthe A. M., et al.
(author)
-
The anti-carbamylated protein antibody response is of overall low avidity despite extensive isotype switching
- 2018
-
In: Rheumatology. - : Oxford University Press. - 1462-0324 .- 1462-0332. ; 57:9, s. 1583-1591
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: To better understand the contribution of autoantibodies in RA and the biology of their responses, we evaluated the avidity of the anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibody response.Methods: The avidity of anti-CarP antibody, ACPA and anti-tetanus toxoid IgG were determined using elution assays. Anti-CarP IgG avidity was measured in sera of 107 RA patients, 15 paired SF and serum samples and 8 serially sampled sera before and after disease onset.Results: The avidity of anti-CarP IgG is low compared with the avidity of anti-tetanus toxoid IgG present in the same sera. Likewise, although less pronounced, anti-CarP also displayed a lower avidity as compared with the avidity of ACPA IgG. No difference in anti-CarP IgG avidity is observed between ACPA positive or ACPA negative patients. Anti-CarP IgG avidity is higher in anti-CarP IgM-negative compared with IgM-positive individuals. Furthermore, the anti-CarP avidity in serum is higher than in SF. Using samples of individuals that over time developed RA we observed no anti-CarP avidity maturation in the years before disease onset. In contrast to ACPA avidity, the anti-CarP avidity is not associated with severity of joint destruction.Conclusion: The anti-CarP response is of overall low avidity, even lower than the ACPA IgG avidity, and does not show apparent avidity maturation before or around disease onset. Overall, isotype switch and avidity maturation seem to be uncoupled as isotype switch occurs without avidity maturation, pointing towards a commonality in the regulation of both autoantibody responses as opposed to the pathways governing recall responses.
|
|