SwePub - search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-176...

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Sahide, Muhammad A. K., et al. (author) The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict : A typology of capacities 2019 In: MethodsX. - : Elsevier BV. - 1258-780X .- 2215-0161. ; 6, s. 2536-2543 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract Recent land management policies around the world have experienced a broader political push to resolve forest and land tenure conflict through agrarian reform policy. As a result, conservation bureaucracies are responding with both formal and informal interventions to acknowledge the role of people in forests. In this methods paper, we provide a closer examination of the ways that conservation bureaucracies apply their political capacity in negotiating forest and land tenure conflicts. Our proposed method measures both the capacity and actions of conservation bureaucracies, combining formal dimensions (such as of legal status, budget availability, and the type of organization unit) with informal dimensions (including ways of gaining authority, donors and funding, and trust). The framing is rooted in theories of bureaucratic politics, and while culled from rich empirical experiences from Indonesia, the proposed method is also applicable in examining bureaucratic politics in other natural resource governance contexts.

Sahide, Muhammad A. K., et al. (author)
The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict : A typology of capacities
2019
In: MethodsX. - : Elsevier BV. - 1258-780X .- 2215-0161. ; 6, s. 2536-2543
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Recent land management policies around the world have experienced a broader political push to resolve forest and land tenure conflict through agrarian reform policy. As a result, conservation bureaucracies are responding with both formal and informal interventions to acknowledge the role of people in forests. In this methods paper, we provide a closer examination of the ways that conservation bureaucracies apply their political capacity in negotiating forest and land tenure conflicts. Our proposed method measures both the capacity and actions of conservation bureaucracies, combining formal dimensions (such as of legal status, budget availability, and the type of organization unit) with informal dimensions (including ways of gaining authority, donors and funding, and trust). The framing is rooted in theories of bureaucratic politics, and while culled from rich empirical experiences from Indonesia, the proposed method is also applicable in examining bureaucratic politics in other natural resource governance contexts.

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-176642" "