SwePub - search: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/25...

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Ögren, Mikael, 1972, et al. (author) Comparison of annoyance from railway noise and railway vibration 2017 In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI AG. - 1660-4601. ; 14:7 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract The aim of this study is to compare vibration exposure to noise exposure from railway traffic in terms of equal annoyance, i.e., to determine when a certain noise level is equally annoying as a corresponding vibration velocity. Based on questionnaire data from the Train Vibration and Noise Effects (TVANE) research project from residential areas exposed to railway noise and vibration, the dose response relationship for annoyance was estimated. By comparing the relationships between exposure and annoyance for areas both with and without significant vibration exposure, the noise levels and vibration velocities that had an equal probability of causing annoyance was determined using logistic regression. The comparison gives a continuous mapping between vibration velocity in the ground and a corresponding noise level at the facade that are equally annoying. For equivalent noise level at the facade compared to maximum weighted vibration velocity in the ground the probability of annoyance is approximately 20% for 59 dB or 0.48 mm/s, and about 40% for 63 dB or 0.98 mm/s.

Ögren, Mikael, 1972, et al. (author)
Comparison of annoyance from railway noise and railway vibration
2017
In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI AG. - 1660-4601. ; 14:7
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim of this study is to compare vibration exposure to noise exposure from railway traffic in terms of equal annoyance, i.e., to determine when a certain noise level is equally annoying as a corresponding vibration velocity. Based on questionnaire data from the Train Vibration and Noise Effects (TVANE) research project from residential areas exposed to railway noise and vibration, the dose response relationship for annoyance was estimated. By comparing the relationships between exposure and annoyance for areas both with and without significant vibration exposure, the noise levels and vibration velocities that had an equal probability of causing annoyance was determined using logistic regression. The comparison gives a continuous mapping between vibration velocity in the ground and a corresponding noise level at the facade that are equally annoying. For equivalent noise level at the facade compared to maximum weighted vibration velocity in the ground the probability of annoyance is approximately 20% for 59 dB or 0.48 mm/s, and about 40% for 63 dB or 0.98 mm/s.

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/255521" "