SwePub - search: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:5...

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Liu, Xiao, et al. (author) Comparison study on LES combustion models in diffusion flame 2018 In: Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Engineering University. - 1006-7043. ; 39:3, s. 496-502 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract This study comparatively analyzes the calculation performances of different large-eddy simulation (LES) combustion models in a diffused flame simulation to investigate the performances of different LES-turbulent combustion models. The flamelet/progress variable (FPV), partially stirred reactor (PaSR), and transport joint possibility density function (PDF) combustion model are adopted to perform a numerical simulation analysis for Flame D in the Sandia Lab. The comparison between the calculation results and the test data shows that the three models can properly simulate the diffused flame. The transport PDF model based on the Eulerian stochastic field method can realize better results, especially the forecast for the intermediate radicals (OH) and the pollutant emissions (NO). However, the calculation volume is huge. The calculation speed and precision of PaSR are acceptable. The FPV method can save much CPU time, and has great value in engineering applications.

Liu, Xiao, et al. (author)
Comparison study on LES combustion models in diffusion flame
2018
In: Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Engineering University. - 1006-7043. ; 39:3, s. 496-502
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This study comparatively analyzes the calculation performances of different large-eddy simulation (LES) combustion models in a diffused flame simulation to investigate the performances of different LES-turbulent combustion models. The flamelet/progress variable (FPV), partially stirred reactor (PaSR), and transport joint possibility density function (PDF) combustion model are adopted to perform a numerical simulation analysis for Flame D in the Sandia Lab. The comparison between the calculation results and the test data shows that the three models can properly simulate the diffused flame. The transport PDF model based on the Eulerian stochastic field method can realize better results, especially the forecast for the intermediate radicals (OH) and the pollutant emissions (NO). However, the calculation volume is huge. The calculation speed and precision of PaSR are acceptable. The FPV method can save much CPU time, and has great value in engineering applications.

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:551f1e67-88e3-4453-a9a3-7895203e3556" "