SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "(LAR1:gu) lar1:(bth) srt2:(2020-2024)"

Search: (LAR1:gu) lar1:(bth) > (2020-2024)

  • Result 1-10 of 14
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Ali, Nauman bin, et al. (author)
  • The impact of a proposal for innovation measurement in the software industry
  • 2020
  • In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. - New York, NY, USA : IEEE Computer Society. - 1949-3789 .- 1949-3770. - 9781450375801
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background: Measuring an organization's capability to innovate and assessing its innovation output and performance is a challenging task. Previously, a comprehensive model and a suite of measurements to support this task were proposed. Aims: In the current paper, seven years since the publication of the paper titled Towards innovation measurement in the software industry, we have reflected on the impact of thework. Method:We have mainly relied on quantitative and qualitative analysis of the citations of the paper using an established classification schema. Results: We found that the article has had a significant scientific impact (indicated by the number of citations), i.e., (1) cited in literature from both software engineering and other fields, (2) cited in grey literature and peerreviewed literature, and (3) substantial citations in literature not published in the English language. However, we consider a majority of the citations in the peer-reviewed literature (75 out of 116) as neutral, i.e., they have not used the innovation measurement paper in any substantial way. All in all, 38 out of 116 have used, modified or based their work on the definitions, measurements or the model proposed in the article. This analysis revealed a significant weakness of the citing work, i.e., among the citing papers, we found only two explicit comparisons to the innovation measurement proposal, and we found no papers that identify weaknesses of said proposal. Conclusions: This work highlights the need for being cautious of relying solely on the number of citations for understanding impact, and the need for further improving and supporting the peer-review process to identify unwarranted citations in papers. © 2020 IEEE Computer Society. All rights reserved.
  •  
2.
  • Enlöf, Per, et al. (author)
  • Smart Glasses for Anesthesia Care : Initial Focus Group Interviews with Specialized Health Care Professionals
  • 2021
  • In: Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 1089-9472 .- 1532-8473. ; 36:1, s. 47-53
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Purpose: Smart glasses are a kind of wearable technology that gives users sustained, hands-free access to data and can transmit and receive information wirelessly. Earlier studies have suggested that smart glasses have the potential to improve patient safety in anesthesia care. Research regarding health care professionals' views of the potential use of smart glasses in anesthesia care is limited. The purpose of this study was to describe anesthesia health care professionals' views of smart glasses before clinical use. Design: A qualitative descriptive study. Methods: Data were collected from focus group interviews and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Findings: Three categories of participants' views of smart glasses were created during the analysis: views of integrating smart glasses in clinical setting; views of customized functionality of smart glasses; and views of being a user of smart glasses. One theme, striving for situational control, was identified in the analysis. Conclusions: Smart glasses were seen as a tool that can impact and improve access to patient-related information, and aid health care professionals in their struggle to gain situational control during anesthesia care. These are factors related to increased patient safety. (c) 2020 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
  •  
3.
  • Fagerholm, F., et al. (author)
  • Cognition in Software Engineering: A Taxonomy and Survey of a Half-Century of Research
  • 2022
  • In: Acm Computing Surveys. - : Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). - 0360-0300 .- 1557-7341. ; 54:11
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Cognition plays a fundamental role in most software engineering activities. This article provides a taxonomy of cognitive concepts and a survey of the literature since the beginning of the Software Engineering discipline. The taxonomy comprises the top-level concepts of perception, attention, memory, cognitive load, reasoning, cognitive biases, knowledge, social cognition, cognitive control, and errors, and procedures to assess them both qualitatively and quantitatively. The taxonomy provides a useful tool to filter existing studies, classify new studies, and support researchers in getting familiar with a (sub) area. In the literature survey, we systematically collected and analysed 311 scientific papers spanning five decades and classified them using the cognitive concepts from the taxonomy. Our analysis shows that the most developed areas of research correspond to the four life-cycle stages, software requirements, design, construction, and maintenance. Most research is quantitative and focuses on knowledge, cognitive load, memory, and reasoning. Overall, the state of the art appears fragmented when viewed from the perspective of cognition. There is a lack of use of cognitive concepts that would represent a coherent picture of the cognitive processes active in specific tasks. Accordingly, we discuss the research gap in each cognitive concept and provide recommendations for future research.
  •  
4.
  • Franch, Xavier, et al. (author)
  • How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research?
  • 2022
  • In: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. - : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. - 0098-5589 .- 1939-3520. ; 48:6, s. 1947-1964
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Context: The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is vital for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. Some authors have speculated about a mismatch between research and practice in the RE discipline. However, there is not much evidence to support or refute this perception. Objective: This paper presents the results of a study aimed at gathering evidence from practitioners about their perception of the relevance of RE research and at understanding the factors that influence that perception. Method: We conducted a questionnaire-based survey of industry practitioners with expertise in RE. The participants rated the perceived relevance of 435 scientific papers presented at five top RE-related conferences. Results: The 153 participants provided a total of 2,164 ratings. The practitioners rated RE research as essential or worthwhile in a majority of cases. However, the percentage of non-positive ratings is still higher than we would like. Among the factors that affect the perception of relevance are the paper?s links to industry, the research method used, and respondents? roles. The reasons for positive perceptions were primarily related to the relevance of the problem and the soundness of the solution, while the causes for negative perceptions were more varied. The respondents also provided suggestions for future research, including topics researchers have studied for decades, like elicitation or requirement quality criteria. Conclusions: The study is valuable for both researchers and practitioners. Researchers can use the reasons respondents gave for positive and negative perceptions and the suggested research topics to help make their research more appealing to practitioners and thus more prone to industry adoption. Practitioners can benefit from the overall view of contemporary RE research by learning about research topics that they may not be familiar with, and compare their perception with those of their colleagues to self-assess their positioning towards more academic research. IEEE
  •  
5.
  • Gren, Lucas, 1984-, et al. (author)
  • Is it possible to disregard obsolete requirements? a family of experiments in software effort estimation
  • 2021
  • In: Requirements Engineering. - : Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. - 0947-3602 .- 1432-010X. ; :3, s. 459-480
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Expert judgement is a common method for software effort estimations in practice today. Estimators are often shown extra obsolete requirements together with the real ones to be implemented. Only one previous study has been conducted on if such practices bias the estimations. We conducted six experiments with both students and practitioners to study, and quantify, the effects of obsolete requirements on software estimation. By conducting a family of six experiments using both students and practitioners as research subjects (N= 461), and by using a Bayesian Data Analysis approach, we investigated different aspects of this effect. We also argue for, and show an example of, how we by using a Bayesian approach can be more confident in our results and enable further studies with small sample sizes. We found that the presence of obsolete requirements triggered an overestimation in effort across all experiments. The effect, however, was smaller in a field setting compared to using students as subjects. Still, the over-estimations triggered by the obsolete requirements were systematically around twice the percentage of the included obsolete ones, but with a large 95% credible interval. The results have implications for both research and practice in that the found systematic error should be accounted for in both studies on software estimation and, maybe more importantly, in estimation practices to avoid over-estimations due to this systematic error. We partly explain this error to be stemming from the cognitive bias of anchoring-and-adjustment, i.e. the obsolete requirements anchored a much larger software. However, further studies are needed in order to accurately predict this effect. © 2021, The Author(s).
  •  
6.
  • Gren, Lucas, 1984-, et al. (author)
  • What Makes Effective Leadership in Agile Software Development Teams?
  • 2022
  • In: International Conference on Software Engineering. - New York, NY, USA : IEEE Computer Society. - 9781450392211 ; , s. 2402-2414
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Effective leadership is one of the key drivers of business and project success, and one of the most active areas of management research. But how does leadership work in agile software development, which emphasizes self-management and self-organization and marginalizes traditional leadership roles? To find out, this study examines agile leadership from the perspective of thirteen professionals who identify as agile leaders, in different roles, at ten different software development companies of varying sizes. Data from semi-structured interviews reveals that leadership: (1) is dynamically shared among team members; (2) engenders a sense of belonging to the team; and (3) involves balancing competing organizational cultures (e.g. balancing the new agile culture with the old milestone-driven culture). In other words, agile leadership is a property of a team, not a role, and effectiveness depends on agile team members' identifying with the team, accepting responsibility, and being sensitive to cultural conflict. 
  •  
7.
  • Karlsson, Charlie, 1945-, et al. (author)
  • Innovative transformations of global city regions in the post-urban world
  • 2020
  • In: Urban empires: Cities as global rulers in the new urban world. Glaeser, E., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. (red.). - New York City : Taylor & Francis. - 9780429892363 - 9781138601703 ; , s. 257-274, s. 257-274
  • Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
  •  
8.
  • Kjellberg, A., et al. (author)
  • Randomised, controlled, open label, multicentre clinical trial to explore safety and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen for preventing ICU admission, morbidity and mortality in adult patients with COVID-19
  • 2021
  • In: BMJ Open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 11:7
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Introduction COVID-19 may cause severe pneumonitis and trigger a massive inflammatory response that requires ventilatory support. The intensive care unit (ICU)-mortality has been reported to be as high as 62%. Dexamethasone is the only of all anti-inflammatory drugs that have been tested to date that has shown a positive effect on mortality. We aim to explore if treatment with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) is safe and effective for patients with severe COVID-19. Our hypothesis is that HBO can prevent ICU admission, morbidity and mortality by attenuating the inflammatory response. The primary objective is to evaluate if HBO reduces the number of ICU admissions compared with best practice treatment for COVID-19, main secondary objectives are to evaluate if HBO reduces the load on ICU resources, morbidity and mortality and to evaluate if HBO mitigates the inflammatory reaction in COVID-19. Methods and analysis A randomised, controlled, phase II, open label, multicentre trial. 200 subjects with severe COVID-19 and at least two risk factors for mortality will be included. Baseline clinical data and blood samples will be collected before randomisation and repeated daily for 7 days, at days 14 and 30. Subjects will be randomised with a computer-based system to HBO, maximum five times during the first 7 days plus best practice treatment or only best practice treatment. The primary endpoint, ICU admission, is defined by criteria for selection for ICU. We will evaluate if HBO mitigates the inflammatory reaction in COVID-19 using molecular analyses. All parameters are recorded in an electronic case report form. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will review the safety parameters. Ethics and dissemination The trial is approved by The National Institutional Review Board in Sweden (2020-01705) and the Swedish Medical Product Agency (5.1-2020-36673). Positive, negative and any inconclusive results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with open access.
  •  
9.
  • Lenberg, Per, et al. (author)
  • Qualitative software engineering research : Reflections and guidelines
  • 2024
  • In: Journal of Software. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2047-7473 .- 2047-7481. ; 36:6
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Researchers are increasingly recognizing the importance of human aspects in software development. Because qualitative methods are used to explore human behavior in-depth, we believe that studies using such methods will become more common. Existing qualitative software engineering guidelines do not cover the full breadth of qualitative methods and the knowledge on how to use them like in social sciences. The purpose of this study was to extend the software engineering community's current body of knowledge regarding available qualitative methods and their quality assurance frameworks and to provide recommendations and guidelines for their use. With the support of an epistemological argument and a survey of the literature, we suggest that future research would benefit from (1) utilizing a broader set of research methods, (2) more strongly emphasizing reflexivity, and (3) employing qualitative guidelines and quality criteria. We present an overview of three qualitative methods commonly used in social sciences but rarely seen in software engineering research, namely interpretative phenomenological analysis, narrative analysis, and discourse analysis. Furthermore, we discuss the meaning of reflexivity in relation to the software engineering context and suggest means of fostering it. Our paper will help software engineering researchers better select and then guide the application of a broader set of qualitative research methods. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  •  
10.
  • Lindberg, Catharina, et al. (author)
  • The meaning of surviving three years after a heart transplant : a transition from uncertainty to acceptance through adaptation
  • 2020
  • In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI. - 1661-7827 .- 1660-4601. ; 17:15
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The rationale was to longitudinally follow-up interviews performed with heart recipients at their one-year examination in order to deepen the understanding of the meaning of surviving a heart transplant. The aim was to explore the meaning of surviving three years after a heart transplant compared to one year and to identify what constitutes the change process. A phenomenological–hermeneutic method was used. This multicenter study was carried out at the two hospitals in Sweden where heart transplants are performed. A total of 13 heart recipients who survived three years after a heart transplant were invited to participate in this three-year follow-up study and 12 accepted, 3 women and 9 men, with a mean age of 51.25 years. The naïve understanding revealed that the heart recipients strongly accepted their life situation and that time had enabled this acceptance of limitations through adaptation. The thematic structural analyses cover six themes illustrating the meaning of acceptance and adaptation, i.e., accepting life as it is, adapting to post-transplant limitations, adapting to a changed body, social adaptation, showing gratitude and trusting oneself and others. In conclusion, achieving acceptance and a solid sense of self-efficacy after heart transplantation is a time-consuming process that involves courage to face and accept the reality and adapt in every life dimension. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 14
Type of publication
journal article (10)
conference paper (2)
research review (1)
book chapter (1)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (13)
other academic/artistic (1)
Author/Editor
Gren, Lucas, 1984 (4)
Torkar, Richard, 197 ... (2)
Berntsson Svensson, ... (2)
Feldt, Robert, 1972 (2)
Skär, Lisa, 1964- (2)
Enlöf, Per (2)
show more...
Lindholm, P (1)
Sanmartin Berglund, ... (1)
Kraus, M. (1)
Unterkalmsteiner, Mi ... (1)
Wnuk, Krzysztof, 198 ... (1)
Bergman, P. (1)
Forsberg, Anna (1)
Mendez, Daniel (1)
Ralph, Paul (1)
Fucci, Davide, 1985- (1)
Franch, Xavier (1)
Braunerhjelm, Pontus ... (1)
Felderer, Michael, 1 ... (1)
Anderberg, Peter (1)
Feldt, Robert (1)
Gorschek, Tony, 1972 ... (1)
Karlsson, Charlie, 1 ... (1)
de Oliveira Neto, Fr ... (1)
Douglas, J (1)
Furia, Carlo A, 1979 (1)
Knauss, Eric, 1977 (1)
Ali, Nauman Bin (1)
Edison, Henry (1)
Esmaeilzadeh, Saeid (1)
Almgren, Matilda (1)
Lennerling, Annette, ... (1)
Martini, M. (1)
Rodriguez-Wallberg, ... (1)
Tidefors, Inga, 1949 (1)
Jildenstål, Pether, ... (1)
Skold, M (1)
Lindberg, Catharina (1)
Ström, Viktor, 1992 (1)
Ringdal, Mona, 1955 (1)
Kjellberg, A. (1)
Jildenstål, Pether (1)
Zimmermann, Thomas (1)
Catrina, S. B. (1)
Westlund, Hans, 1957 ... (1)
Vogelsang, Andreas (1)
Haas, Tigran, 1969- (1)
Carver, Jeffrey C. (1)
Ouriques, Raquel (1)
Zheng, X. W. (1)
show less...
University
University of Gothenburg (14)
Blekinge Institute of Technology (14)
Chalmers University of Technology (4)
Royal Institute of Technology (1)
Örebro University (1)
Jönköping University (1)
show more...
Lund University (1)
University of Skövde (1)
Linnaeus University (1)
Karolinska Institutet (1)
show less...
Language
English (14)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Natural sciences (8)
Social Sciences (5)
Medical and Health Sciences (4)
Engineering and Technology (3)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view