| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Franco, C., et al.
(author)
-
Size-Exclusion Chromatography Combined with Ultrafiltration Efficiently Isolates Extracellular Vesicles from Human Blood Samples in Health and Disease
- 2023
-
In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences. - : MDPI AG. - 1422-0067. ; 24:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- There is still a need for an efficient method for the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from human blood that provides a reliable yield with acceptable purity. Blood is a source of circulating EVs, but soluble proteins and lipoproteins hamper their concentration, isolation, and detection. This study aims to investigate the efficiency of EV isolation and characterization methods not defined as "gold standard". EVs were isolated from human platelet-free plasma (PFP) of patients and healthy donors through size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) combined with ultrafiltration (UF). Then, EVs were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), imaging flow cytometry (IFC), and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). TEM images showed intact and roundish nanoparticles in pure samples. IFC analysis detected a prevalence of CD63+ EVs compared to CD9+, CD81+, and CD11c+ EVs. NTA confirmed the presence of small EVs with a concentration of similar to 10(10) EVs/mL that were comparable when stratifying the subjects by baseline demographics; conversely, concentration differed according to the health status across healthy donors and patients affected with autoimmune diseases (130 subjects in total, with 65 healthy donors and 65 idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients). Altogether, our data show that a combined EV isolation method, i.e., SEC followed by UF, is a reliable approach to isolate intact EVs with a significant yield from complex fluids, which might characterize disease conditions early.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Leuzy, A., et al.
(author)
-
Robustness of CSF A beta 42/40 and A beta 42/P-tau181 measured using fully automated immunoassays to detect AD-related outcomes
- 2023
-
In: Alzheimers & Dementia. - : Wiley. - 1552-5260 .- 1552-5279. ; 19:7, s. 2994-3004
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- IntroductionThis study investigated the comparability of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cutoffs for Elecsys immunoassays for amyloid beta (A beta)42/A beta 40 or A beta 42/phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 and the effects of measurement variability when predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related outcomes (i.e., A beta-positron emission tomography [PET] visual read and AD neuropathology). MethodsWe studied 750 participants (BioFINDER study, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI], and University of California San Francisco [UCSF]). Youden's index was used to identify cutoffs and to calculate accuracy (A beta-PET visual read as outcome). Using longitudinal variability in A beta-negative controls, we identified a gray zone around cut-points where the risk of an inconsistent predicted outcome was >5%. ResultsFor A beta 42/A beta 40, cutoffs across cohorts were <0.059 (BioFINDER), <0.057 (ADNI), and <0.058 (UCSF). For A beta 42/p-tau181, cutoffs were <41.90 (BioFINDER), <39.20 (ADNI), and <46.02 (UCSF). Accuracy was approximate to 90% for both A beta 42/A beta 40 and A beta 42/p-tau181 using these cutoffs. Using A beta-PET as an outcome, 8.7% of participants fell within a gray zone interval for A beta 42/A beta 40, compared to 4.5% for A beta 42/p-tau181. Similar findings were observed using a measure of overall AD neuropathologic change (7.7% vs. 3.3%). In a subset with CSF and plasma A beta 42/40, the number of individuals within the gray zone was approximate to 1.5 to 3 times greater when using plasma A beta 42/40. DiscussionCSF A beta 42/p-tau181 was more robust to the effects of measurement variability, suggesting that it may be the preferred Elecsys-based measure in clinical practice and trials.
|
|
| 7. |
- Picetti, Edoardo, et al.
(author)
-
Early management of isolated severe traumatic brain injury patients in a hospital without neurosurgical capabilities : a consensus and clinical recommendations of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES)
- 2023
-
In: World Journal of Emergency Surgery. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1749-7922. ; 18:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients should be primarily admitted to a hub trauma center (hospital with neurosurgical capabilities) to allow immediate delivery of appropriate care in a specialized environment. Sometimes, severe TBI patients are admitted to a spoke hospital (hospital without neurosurgical capabilities), and scarce data are available regarding the optimal management of severe isolated TBI patients who do not have immediate access to neurosurgical care.METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus panel composed of 41 physicians selected for their established clinical and scientific expertise in the acute management of TBI patients with different specializations (anesthesia/intensive care, neurocritical care, acute care surgery, neurosurgery and neuroradiology) was established. The consensus was endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery, and a modified Delphi approach was adopted.RESULTS: A total of 28 statements were proposed and discussed. Consensus was reached on 22 strong recommendations and 3 weak recommendations. In three cases, where consensus was not reached, no recommendation was provided.CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides practical recommendations to support clinician's decision making in the management of isolated severe TBI patients in centers without neurosurgical capabilities and during transfer to a hub center.
|
|
