SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "L773:1473 6810 OR L773:1356 5524 srt2:(2015-2019)"

Search: L773:1473 6810 OR L773:1356 5524 > (2015-2019)

  • Result 1-10 of 10
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Anttila, Sten, et al. (author)
  • Challenge of communicating uncertainty in systematic reviews when applying GRADE ratings
  • 2018
  • In: Evidence-Based Medicine. - : BMJ. - 1356-5524 .- 2515-446X .- 2515-4478.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • One of the most widely used tools for assessing and communicating scienti c uncertainty is Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), a system for rating the quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in healthcare. More than 100 organisations around the world—WHO included1— are using GRADE or have endorsed it.In GRADE, a quantitative assessment of uncertainty is qualitatively communicated, so that a result obtained as a CI relative to a threshold is expressed as a nding in which assessors have low, moderate or high certainty, or certainty described with other such quali ers. What these correspond to in quantitative terms, and how decision-makers interpret them, is our issue here. We con ne our attention to GRADE’s decision rules for systematic reviews, and do not comment on the problem of multiple outcomes in guideline recommendations.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 10

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view