| 1. |
- Andersen, Kasper, 1974-, et al.
(author)
-
Dose–Response Relationship of Total and Leisure Time Physical Activity to Risk of Heart Failure : a prospective cohort study
- 2014
-
In: Circulation Heart Failure. - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 7:5, s. 701-708
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background—The nature of the association between levels of physical activity and risk of heart failure is little known. We investigated nonlinear associations of total and leisure time physical activity with risk of heart failure.Methods and Results—In 1997, 39 805 persons without heart failure completed a questionnaire of lifestyle factors and medical history. We used Cox regression models to investigate total (adjusting for education and previous myocardial infarction) and direct (multivariable-adjusted) effects of self-reported total and leisure time physical activity on risk of heart failure of any cause and heart failure of nonischemic origin. Heart failure diagnoses were obtained until December 31, 2010. Higher leisure time physical activity was associated with lower risk of heart failure of any cause; hazard ratio of the total effect of leisure time physical activity was for fifth versus first quintile 0.54; 95% confidence interval was 0.44 to 0.66. The direct effect was similar. High total daily physical activity level was associated with lower risk of heart failure, although the effect was less pronounced than for leisure time physical activity (total effect hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.95; fifth versus first quintile). A similar direct effect observed.Conclusions—Leisure time physical activity was inversely related to risk of developing heart failure in a dose–response fashion. This was reflected in a similar but less pronounced association of total physical activity with risk of heart failure. Only part of the effects appeared to be mediated by traditional risk factors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bello, N. A., et al.
(author)
-
Influence of Previous Heart Failure Hospitalization on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction
- 2014
-
In: Circulation-Heart Failure. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 7:4, s. 590-595
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background-Hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF) is associated with high rates of subsequent mortality and readmission. We assessed the influence of the time interval between previous HF hospitalization and randomization in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) trials on clinical outcomes in patients with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results-CHARM enrolled 7599 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV HF, of whom 5426 had a history of previous HF hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between time from previous HF hospitalization and randomization and the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or unplanned admission to hospital for the management of worsening HF during a median of 36.6 months. For patients with HF and reduced or preserved ejection fraction, rates of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization were higher among patients with previous HF hospitalization than those without. The risk for mortality and hospitalization varied inversely with the time interval between hospitalization and randomization. Rates were higher for patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction within each category. Event rates for those with HF with preserved ejection fraction and a HF hospitalization in the 6 months before randomization were comparable with the rate in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction with no previous HF hospitalization. Conclusions-Rates of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization are greatest in those who have been previously hospitalized for HF. Independent of EF, rates of death and readmission decline as time from HF hospitalization to trial enrollment increased. Recent HF hospitalization identifies a high-risk population for future clinical trials in HF and reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bello, N. A., et al.
(author)
-
Influence of Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction
- 2014
-
In: Circulation Heart Failure. - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 7, s. 590-595
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: -Hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF) is associated with high rates of subsequent mortality and readmission. We assessed the influence of the time interval between prior HF hospitalization and randomization in the CHARM trials on clinical outcomes in patients with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: -CHARM enrolled 7,599 patients with NYHA class II-IV heart failure, of whom 5,426 had a history of prior HF hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized to assess the association between time from prior HF hospitalization and randomization and the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or unplanned admission to hospital for the management of worsening HF over a median of 36.6 months. For patients with HF and reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction, rates of CV mortality and HF hospitalization were higher among patients with prior HF hospitalization than those without. The risk for mortality and hospitalization varied inversely with the time interval between hospitalization and randomization. Rates were higher for HFrEF patients within each category. Event rates for those with HFpEF and a HF hospitalization in the 6 months prior to randomization were comparable to the rate in HFrEF patients with no prior HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: -Rates of CV death or HF hospitalization are greatest in those who have been previously hospitalized for HF. Independent of EF, rates of death and readmission decline as time from HF hospitalization to trial enrollment increased. Recent HF hospitalization identifies a high risk population for future clinical trials in HFrEF and HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00634400.
|
|
| 4. |
- Eapen, Z. J., et al.
(author)
-
Do Countries or Hospitals With Longer Hospital Stays for Acute Heart Failure Have Lower Readmission Rates?: Findings From ASCEND-HF
- 2013
-
In: Circulation Heart Failure. - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 6:4, s. 727-32
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background- Hospital readmission is an important clinical outcome of patients with heart failure. Its relation to length of stay for the initial hospitalization is not clear. Methods and Results- We used hierarchical modeling of data from a clinical trial to examine variations in length of stay across countries and across hospitals in the United States and its association with readmission within 30 days of randomization. Main outcomes included associations between country-level length of stay and readmission rates, after adjustment for patient-level case mix; and associations between length of stay and readmission rates across sites in the United States. Across 27 countries with 389 sites and 6848 patients, mean length of stay ranged from 4.9 to 14.6 days (6.1 days in the United States). Rates of all-cause readmission ranged from 2.5% to 25.0% (17.8% in the United States). There was an inverse correlation between country-level mean length of stay and readmission (r=-0.52; P<0.01). After multivariable adjustment, each additional inpatient day across countries was associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause readmission (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.98; P=0.02) and heart failure readmission (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.99; P=0.03). Similar trends were observed across US study sites concerning readmission for any cause (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.00; P=0.06) and readmission for heart failure (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.01; P=0.07). Across countries and across US sites, longer median length of stay was independently associated with lower risk of readmission. Conclusions- Countries with longer length of stay for heart failure hospitalizations had significantly lower rates of readmission within 30 days of randomization. These findings may have implications for developing strategies to prevent readmission, defining quality measures, and designing clinical trials in acute heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00475852.
|
|
| 5. |
- Gravning, J., et al.
(author)
-
Prognostic Effect of High-Sensitive Troponin T Assessment in Elderly Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Results From the CORONA Trial
- 2014
-
In: Circulation-Heart Failure. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 7:1, s. 96-103
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background The incremental prognostic value of high-sensitive troponin T (hs-cTnT) in heart failure (HF) beyond that of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and amino-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide is debated. We examined the prognostic value of hs-cTnT in a subgroup of patients from the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in HF (CORONA) study. Methods and Results Hs-cTnT as a risk factor for the primary end point (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke; n=356), as well as all-cause mortality (n=366), cardiovascular mortality (n=299), and the composite of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization from worsening of HF (n=465), was investigated in 1245 patients (60 years; New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, ischemic systolic HF) randomly assigned to 10 mg rosuvastatin or placebo. In multivariable analyses, adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class, age, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, sex, intermittent claudication, heart rate, estimated glomerular filtration rate, apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-1 ratio, amino-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and hs-cTnT (both dichotomized according to the 99th percentile and as a continuous variable) was associated with all end points (primary end point: hazard ratio, 1.87 and 1.51, respectively, per SD change; P<0.001; all other end points: hazard ratio, 1.39-1.70). However, improved discrimination as assessed by C-statistics was only seen for the primary end point and all-cause mortality. Conclusions Elevated hs-cTnT levels provide strong and independent prognostic information in older patients with chronic ischemic HF. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00206310.
|
|
| 6. |
- Kaluza, Joanna, et al.
(author)
-
Processed and Unprocessed Red Meat Consumption and Risk of Heart Failure Prospective Study of Men
- 2014
-
In: Circulation Heart Failure. - : LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 7:4, s. 552-U27
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background-Epidemiological studies of red meat consumption in relation to risk of heart failure (HF) are scarce. We examined the associations of unprocessed and processed red meat consumption with HF incidence and mortality in men. Methods and Results-The population-based prospective Cohort of Swedish Men included 37 035 men, aged 45 to 79 years, with no history of HF, ischemic heart disease, or cancer at baseline. Meat consumption was assessed with a self-administered questionnaire in 1997. During a mean follow-up of 11.8 years, 2891 incidences and 266 deaths from HF were ascertained. Consumption of processed meat was statistically significant positively associated with risk of HF in both age-and multivariable-adjusted models. Men who consumed > 75 g/d processed meat compared with those who consumed <25 g/d had a 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.48, P trend=0.01) higher risk of HF incidence and 2.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-3.88, P trend<0.001) higher risk of HF mortality. The consumption of unprocessed meat was not associated with increased risk of incidence of HF or mortality from HF. Conclusions-Findings from this prospective study of men with low to moderate red meat consumption indicate that processed red meat consumption, but not unprocessed red meat, is associated with an increased risk of HF.
|
|
| 7. |
- Krum, H., et al.
(author)
-
Clinical Benefit of Eplerenone in Patients With Mild Symptoms of Systolic Heart Failure Already Receiving Optimal Best Practice Background Drug Therapy: Analysis of the EMPHASIS-HF Study
- 2013
-
In: Circulation Heart Failure. - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 6:4, s. 711-8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background- In EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure), eplerenone significantly reduced major cardiovascular events versus placebo in 2737 patients with mild symptoms of heart failure and an ejection fraction of <35%, in addition to recommended therapy. However, it is not known whether such benefits were preserved in patients receiving optimal background drug therapy, that is, high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi, or angiotensin receptor blocker), beta-blocker, or both drug classes. Methods and Results- We further analyzed EMPHASIS-HF according to the use and dose of these BACKGROUND: value for interaction 0.80, 0.15, and 0.53, respectively), as well as for all-cause mortality. There were no major safety issues, except a borderline increased risk of hypotension with eplerenone in those on high-dose ACEi or ACEi/beta-blocker. Conclusions- Eplerenone provides substantial benefit on major events (with an acceptable safety profile) in patients with mild symptoms of systolic heart failure, even in those already receiving high doses of standard background therapies. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00232180.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Lauten, Alexander, et al.
(author)
-
Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5-Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock Results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-Registry
- 2013
-
In: Circulation Heart Failure. - 1941-3289 .- 1941-3297. ; 6:1, s. 23-30
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background-Acute cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction is associated with high in-hospital mortality attributable to persisting low-cardiac output. The Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Impella-2.5-percutaneous left-ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-This multicenter registry retrospectively included 120 patients (63.6 +/- 12.2 years; 81.7% male) with cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction receiving temporary circulatory support with the Impella-2.5-percutaneous left-ventricular assist device. The primary end point evaluated mortality at 30 days. The secondary end point analyzed the change of plasma lactate after the institution of hemodynamic support, and the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events as well as long-term survival. Thirty-day mortality was 64.2% in the study population. After Impella-2.5-percutaneous left-ventricular assist device implantation, lactate levels decreased from 5.8 +/- 5.0 mmol/L to 4.7 +/- 5.4 mmol/L (P=0.28) and 2.5 +/- 2.6 mmol/L (P=0.023) at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. Early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were reported in 18 (15%) patients. Major bleeding at the vascular access site, hemolysis, and pericardial tamponade occurred in 34 (28.6%), 9 (7.5%), and 2 (1.7%) patients, respectively. The parameters of age >65 and lactate level >3.8 mmol/L at admission were identified as predictors of 30-day mortality. After 317 +/- 526 days of follow-up, survival was 28.3%. Conclusions-In patients with acute cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction, Impella 2.5-treatment is feasible and results in a reduction of lactate levels, suggesting improved organ perfusion. However, 30-day mortality remains high in these patients. This likely reflects the last-resort character of Impella-2.5-application in selected patients with a poor hemodynamic profile and a greater imminent risk of death. Carefully conducted randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of Impella-2.5-support in this high-risk patient group.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
