SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Berlin Gösta) srt2:(2020-2023)"

Search: WFRF:(Berlin Gösta) > (2020-2023)

  • Result 1-10 of 10
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Blaha, M., et al. (author)
  • Analysis of extracorporeal photopheresis within the frame of the WAA register
  • 2021
  • In: Transfusion and apheresis science. - : Elsevier. - 1473-0502 .- 1878-1683. ; 60:5
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The aim of the study was to investigate safety and if extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may change health criteria (HC) and quality of life (QoL).Material and method: 560 patients (33 % women) were treated with ECP for a total of 13,871 procedures during a 17-years period. Mean age was 48 years (±18, range 3−81 years). Self-estimation of QoL was graded: 0 (suicidal) up to 10 (best ever) and HC: 0 (Bed ridden, ICU condition) up to 10 (athletic). Adverse events were analyzed. ANOVA and paired comparisons were performed.Results: Patients were treated due to graft versus host disease (GVHD, n = 317), skin lymphoma (n = 70), solid organ transplants (n = 47), skin diseases (n = 20) and other diseases (n = 106). Adverse events (AEs) were registered in 5.4 % of the first treatments and in 1.2 % of the subsequent procedures. Severe AEs were present in 0.04 % of all procedures. No patient died due to the procedure. Tingling and stitching were the most common AE. For those with GVHD an improvement was noticed within approximately 10 procedures of ECP in the severity stage, QoL (from a mean of 6.1 to 6.8, p < 0.002) and the HC (6.1 -> 6.4, p < 0.014) and improved further with added procedures.Conclusion: Photopheresis is an established therapy with few side effects. The present study of soft variables indicate that GVHD shows benefits upon ECP within approximately 10 procedures in regard to the severity of mainly skin GVHD, and lower baseline levels of HC and QoL.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Knobler, R., et al. (author)
  • European dermatology forum : Updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - Part 2
  • 2021
  • In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. - : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 0926-9959 .- 1468-3083. ; 35:1, s. 27-49
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BackgroundFollowing the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multidisciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐vs.‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease.Materials and methodsIn order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added.Results and conclusionThese updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines were divided into two parts: PART I covers Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐vs.‐host disease and acute graft‐vs.‐host disease, while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn’s disease, use of ECP in paediatric patients, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.
  •  
4.
  • Knobler, R., et al. (author)
  • European dermatology forum - updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020-part 1
  • 2020
  • In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. - : WILEY. - 0926-9959 .- 1468-3083. ; 34:12, s. 2693-2716
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well-known documented conditions such as graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease. Materials and methods In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added. Results and conclusion These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines are divided in two parts: PART I covers cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, chronic graft-versus-host disease and acute graft-versus-host disease while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohns disease, use of ECP in paediatrics practice, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.
  •  
5.
  • Nygaard, Marietta, et al. (author)
  • Extracorporeal photopheresis for graft-vs-host disease : A literature review and treatment guidelines proposed by the Nordic ECP Quality Group
  • 2020
  • In: European Journal of Haematology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0902-4441 .- 1600-0609. ; 104:5, s. 361-375
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is one of the most used and established therapies for steroid-refractory graft-vs-host disease (GvHD), with a good effect to side effect profile. In this review, we present a summary of present literature and provide evidence-based treatment guidelines for ECP in GvHD. The guidelines constitute a consensus statement formed by the Nordic ECP Quality Group representing all ECP centres in the Nordic countries, and aims to facilitate harmonisation and evidence-based practice. In developing the guidelines, we firstly conducted a thorough literature search of original articles and existing guidelines. In total, we identified 26 studies for ECP use in acute GvHD and 36 in chronic GvHD. The studies were generally small, retrospective and heterogeneous regarding patient characteristics, treatment schedule and outcome assessment. In general, a majority of patients achieved partial response or better, but response rates varied by the organs affected. Head-to-head comparisons to other treatment modalities were lacking. Overall, we consider the quality of evidence to be low-moderate (GRADE) and encourage future prospective multi-armed trials to strengthen the present recommendations. However, despite limitations in evidence strength, standardised treatment schedules and regular follow-up are imperative to ensure the best possible patient outcome.
  •  
6.
  • Sahlin, Angelica, et al. (author)
  • Granulocyte concentrates prepared from residual leukocyte units produced by the Reveos automated blood processing system
  • 2020
  • In: Transfusion and apheresis science. - : PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD. - 1473-0502 .- 1878-1683. ; 59:2
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background: Granulocyte concentrates are mainly derived by apheresis technique from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and steroids. The automated blood processing system Reveos, which is now increasingly used across the world, separates whole blood into four components, including a residual leukocyte unit containing granulocytes. The aim of this study was to produce an alternative granulocyte concentrate from leukocyte units produced by the Reveos system, and to assess the function of the granulocytes. Methods: The number of granulocytes was measured in residual leukocyte units, derived from whole blood donations, with different volumes ranging from 10 to 40 ml. After deciding the optimal volume of the leukocyte unit (30 ml), ten ABO-matched units were pooled to form a granulocyte concentrate. The function of the granulocytes from residual leukocyte units was assessed by analyzing surface markers, phagocytosis of yeast, and production of reactive oxygen species. Results: Residual leukocyte units with a volume of 30 ml contained a median number of 0,7 x 10(9) granulocytes, and granulocyte concentrates prepared from ten pooled 30 ml-leukocyte units contained a median number of 6,3 x 10(9) granulocytes. Granulocytes derived from residual leukocyte units displayed surface markers associated with granulocyte function, and capability to phagocytose yeast and produce reactive oxygen species. Conclusions: Granulocyte concentrates prepared from residual leukocyte units contain in vitro functional granulocytes and may be considered as an alternative product in acute situations before regular granulocyte concentrates from stimulated donors are available.
  •  
7.
  • Schain, Frida, et al. (author)
  • Real-world clinical characterization, healthcare resource utilization and productivity loss in chronic graft versus host patients exposed to extracorporeal photopheresis in Sweden
  • 2023
  • In: Transfusion and apheresis science. - : Elsevier BV. - 1473-0502 .- 1878-1683. ; 62:3
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background:Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is frequently used to treat moderate-severe chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD), however limited data exists describing ECP treatment effects on healthcare and societal costs. We aimed to characterize clinical and health economic outcomes and productivity loss in cGVHD patients exposed to ECP.Methods:We identified 2708 patients aged ≥ 18 years with a record of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the Swedish Patient Register between 2006 and 2020. Patients exposed to ECP from 3-months post HSCT (index) were included (n= 183). Data was linked to the Prescribed Drug Register, the Cause of Death Register, and the Longitudinal Integrated Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies (LISA).Results:The median patient age at index was 51 years (IQR1–3; 38–61). In the 3-month period before ECP initiation compared to 9–12 months post-ECP, the cumulative three-month dose per patient decreased prednisolone/prednisone (1,381 mg vs. 658 mg, p < 0.001) and cyclosporin (12,242 mg vs. 3,501 mg, p < 0.001). Infection incidence also decreased over the same period (79.2% vs 59.1%, p < 0.001). Time spent in healthcare decreased from 68.9% to 22.1% from the first and fifth follow-up year respectively, and corresponding annual healthcare cost reduced from €27,719 to €1,981. Among patients < 66 years of age, sickness-related workplace absence decreased from 73.2% to 31.9% between the first and fifth follow-up year, with median annual productivity loss decreasing from €20,358 to €7,211 per patient.Conclusions:ECP was associated with reduced use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and fewer infections. Furthermore, cost and healthcare utilization decreased over time.
  •  
8.
  • Stegmayr, Bernd, 1949-, et al. (author)
  • Using the World Apheresis Association Registry Helps to Improve the Treatment Quality of Therapeutic Apheresis
  • 2021
  • In: Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. - : S. Karger. - 1660-3796 .- 1660-3818. ; 48:4, s. 234-239
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is prescribed to patients that suffer from a severe progressive disease that is not sufficiently treated by conventional medications. A way to gain more knowledge about this treatment is usually by the local analysis of data. However, the use of large quality assessment registries enables analyses of even rare findings. Here, we report some of the recent data from the World Apheresis Association (WAA) registry. Data from >104,000 procedures were documented, and TA was performed on >15,000 patients. The main indication for TA was the collection of autologous stem cells (45% of patients) as part of therapy for therapy. Collection of stem cells from donors for allogeneic transplantation was performed in 11% of patients. Patients with indications such as neurological diseases underwent plasma exchange (28%). Extracorporeal photochemotherapy, lipid apheresis, and antibody removal were other indications. Side effects recorded in the registry have decreased significantly over the years, with approximately only 10/10,000 procedures being interrupted for medical reasons. Conclusion: Collection of data from TA procedures within a multinational and multicenter concept facilitates the improvement of treatment by enabling the analysis of and feedback on indications, procedures, effects, and side effects. (c) 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel
  •  
9.
  • Toy, Pearl, et al. (author)
  • Transfusion-related Acute Lung Injury: 36 Years of Progress (1985-2021)
  • 2022
  • In: Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society online. - : AMER THORACIC SOC. - 1546-3222 .- 1943-5665. ; 19:5, s. 705-712
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The term transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) was coined in 1985 to describe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after transfusion, when another ARDS risk factor was absent; TRALI cases were mostly associated with donor leukocyte antibody. In 2001, plasma from multiparous donors was implicated in TRALI in a randomized controlled trial in Sweden. In 2003 and in many years thereafter, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reported that TRALI was the leading cause of death from transfusion in the United States. In 2003, the United Kingdom was the first among many countries to successfully reduce TRALI using male-predominant plasma. These successes are to be celebrated. Nevertheless, questions remain about the mechanisms of non-antibody TRALI, the role of blood products in the development of ARDS in patients receiving massive transfusion, the causes of unusual TRALI cases, and how to reduce inaccurate diagnoses of TRALI in clinical practice. Regarding the latter, a study in 2013-2015 at 169 U.S. hospitals found that many TRALI diagnoses did not meet clinical definitions. In 2019, a consensus panel established a more precise terminology for clinical diagnosis: TRALI type I and TRALI type II are cases where transfusion is the likely cause, and ARDS are cases where transfusion is not the likely cause. For accurate diagnosis using these clinical definitions, critical care or pulmonary expertise is needed to distinguish between permeability versus hydrostatic pulmonary edema, to determine whether an ARDS risk factor is present, and, if so, to determine whether respiratory function was stable within the 12 hours before transfusion.
  •  
10.
  • Vrielink, Hans, et al. (author)
  • The world apheresis association registry, 2023 update
  • 2023
  • In: Transfusion and apheresis science. - : Elsevier. - 1473-0502 .- 1878-1683. ; 62:6
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The WAA apheresis registry contains data on more than 140,000 apheresis procedures conducted in 12 different countries. The aim is to give an update of indications, type and number of procedures and adverse events (AEs).Material and Methods: The WAA-registry is used for registration of apheresis procedures and is free of charge. The responsible person for a center can apply at the site www.waa-registry.orgResults: Data includes reported AEs from 2012 and various procedures and diagnoses during the years 2018–2022; the latter in total from 27 centers registered a total of 9500 patients (41% women) that began therapeutic apheresis (TA) during the period. A total of 58,355 apheresis procedures were performed. The mean age was 50 years (range 0–94). The most common apheresis procedure was stem cell collection for which multiple myeloma was the most frequent diagnosis (51%). Donor cell collection was done in 14% and plasma exchange (PEX) in 28% of patients; In relation to all performed procedures PEX, using a centrifuge (35%) and LDL-apheresis (20%) were the most common. The main indication for PEX was TTP (17%). Peripheral veins were used in 56% as the vascular access. The preferred anticoagulant was ACD. AEs occurred in 2.7% of all procedures and were mostly mild (1%) and moderate 1.5% (needed supportive medication) and, only rarely, severe (0.15%).Conclusion: The data showed a wide range of indications and variability in apheresis procedures with low AE frequency.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 10

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view