SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Bernstein Jonathan A) srt2:(2020-2023)"

Search: WFRF:(Bernstein Jonathan A) > (2020-2023)

  • Result 1-6 of 6
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Abbafati, Cristiana, et al. (author)
  • 2020
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
  •  
2.
  • Azevedo, Flavio, et al. (author)
  • Social and moral psychology of COVID-19 across 69 countries
  • 2023
  • In: Scientific Data. - : NATURE PORTFOLIO. - 2052-4463. ; 10:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all domains of human life, including the economic and social fabric of societies. One of the central strategies for managing public health throughout the pandemic has been through persuasive messaging and collective behaviour change. To help scholars better understand the social and moral psychology behind public health behaviour, we present a dataset comprising of 51,404 individuals from 69 countries. This dataset was collected for the International Collaboration on Social & Moral Psychology of COVID-19 project (ICSMP COVID-19). This social science survey invited participants around the world to complete a series of moral and psychological measures and public health attitudes about COVID-19 during an early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (between April and June 2020). The survey included seven broad categories of questions: COVID-19 beliefs and compliance behaviours; identity and social attitudes; ideology; health and well-being; moral beliefs and motivation; personality traits; and demographic variables. We report both raw and cleaned data, along with all survey materials, data visualisations, and psychometric evaluations of key variables.
  •  
3.
  • Van Bavel, Jay J., et al. (author)
  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic
  • 2022
  • In: Nature Communications. - : Nature Portfolio. - 2041-1723. ; 13:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Understanding collective behaviour is an important aspect of managing the pandemic response. Here the authors show in a large global study that participants that reported identifying more strongly with their nation reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies in the context of the pandemic. Changing collective behaviour and supporting non-pharmaceutical interventions is an important component in mitigating virus transmission during a pandemic. In a large international collaboration (Study 1, N = 49,968 across 67 countries), we investigated self-reported factors associated with public health behaviours (e.g., spatial distancing and stricter hygiene) and endorsed public policy interventions (e.g., closing bars and restaurants) during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (April-May 2020). Respondents who reported identifying more strongly with their nation consistently reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies. Results were similar for representative and non-representative national samples. Study 2 (N = 42 countries) conceptually replicated the central finding using aggregate indices of national identity (obtained using the World Values Survey) and a measure of actual behaviour change during the pandemic (obtained from Google mobility reports). Higher levels of national identification prior to the pandemic predicted lower mobility during the early stage of the pandemic (r = -0.40). We discuss the potential implications of links between national identity, leadership, and public health for managing COVID-19 and future pandemics.
  •  
4.
  • Schweinsberg, Martin, et al. (author)
  • Same data, different conclusions : Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
  • 2021
  • In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. - : Elsevier BV. - 0749-5978 .- 1095-9920. ; 165, s. 228-249
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists' gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for orga-nizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed.
  •  
5.
  • Ebersole, Charles R., et al. (author)
  • Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability
  • 2020
  • In: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. - : Sage. - 2515-2467 .- 2515-2459. ; 3:3, s. 309-331
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p < .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3-9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276-3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (Delta r = .002 or .014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r = .05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r = .04) and the original RP:P replications (r = .11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r = .37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r = .07, range = .00-.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r = .37, range = .19-.50).
  •  
6.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-6 of 6
Type of publication
journal article (6)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (6)
Author/Editor
Liu, Yang (2)
Raza, Ali (2)
Dezecache, Guillaume (2)
Akrawi, Narin (2)
Harris, Elizabeth (2)
Kantorowicz, Jarosła ... (2)
show more...
Van Lange, Paul A. M ... (2)
Olsson, Andreas (2)
Otterbring, Tobias (2)
Azevedo, Flavio (2)
Pavlovic, Tomislav (2)
Rego, Gabriel G. (2)
Ay, F. Ceren (2)
Gjoneska, Biljana (2)
Etienne, Tom W. (2)
Riano-Moreno, Julian ... (2)
Cichocka, Aleksandra (2)
Capraro, Valerio (2)
Cian, Luca (2)
Longoni, Chiara (2)
Van Bavel, Jay J. (2)
Sjastad, Hallgeir (2)
Nezlek, John B. (2)
Alfano, Mark (2)
Gelfand, Michele J. (2)
Birtel, Michele D. (2)
Cislak, Aleksandra (2)
Lockwood, Patricia L ... (2)
Abts, Koen (2)
Agadullina, Elena (2)
Aruta, John Jamir Be ... (2)
Besharati, Sahba Nom ... (2)
Bor, Alexander (2)
Choma, Becky L. (2)
Crabtree, Charles Da ... (2)
Cunningham, William ... (2)
De, Koustav (2)
Ejaz, Waqas (2)
Elbaek, Christian T. (2)
Findor, Andrej (2)
Flichtentrei, Daniel (2)
Franc, Renata (2)
Gruber, June (2)
Gualda, Estrella (2)
Horiuchi, Yusaku (2)
Huynh, Toan Luu Duc (2)
Imran, Mostak Ahamed (2)
Israelashvili, Jacob (2)
Jasko, Katarzyna (2)
Kantorowicz-Rezniche ... (2)
show less...
University
Stockholm School of Economics (4)
Karolinska Institutet (4)
Linköping University (3)
Royal Institute of Technology (1)
Uppsala University (1)
Stockholm University (1)
show more...
Lund University (1)
Högskolan Dalarna (1)
show less...
Language
English (6)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Social Sciences (4)
Medical and Health Sciences (3)
Natural sciences (2)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view